Wazhai: I am a consumer and simply want to enjoy the best version of the game there is.
Well, that would rule out the Scheme version assuming it has the usual DRM :)
Wazhai: GOG has been lagging behind in terms of second-class treatment from publishers (such as the case we see here) for at least half a decade already. I do not want to get the worse version just to make a statement because my one purchase will not have a tangible effect. GOG has been too lax with publishers who disadvantage GOG customers; they need to enforce better parity.
Are you familiar with the idea of leverage, in the sense of negotiating? Without customers supporting GOG, GOG does not have leverage to enforce anything. Why would NISA (or any publisher) listen to GOG if people are going to buy the game on Scheme anyway?
Look I'm not trying to pick on you or anything, maybe DRM is not even that big a deal to you; I am just saying that without individual customers making a statement, GOG doesn't have enough leverage to enforce parity. It's a sad reality maybe, but seems to be the reality nonetheless.
Honestly, it's a much more complex situation than this too, because many publishers appear inherently biased against DRM-free even when there are thousands of eager users here that would buy their games (I'm talking big stuff like Resident Evil, GTA, etc).