Posted May 27, 2015
Breja
You're in my spot
Registered: Apr 2012
From Poland
pwntronix
New User
Registered: Jul 2010
From United States
Posted May 27, 2015
So GOG deciding to not release the game does not mean that they are deciding to do so based on their understanding of political correctness. They might be or they might not. They might, and by they I could mean every single employee and contractor associated with GOG, all the way down to their newest intern, just think that Hatred is not a game that they want to be associated with or deal with in any way.
There are a couple of issues to discuss here and maybe several different forums should be made:
1. Does GOG have freedom of choice?
If you answered No 1, then go to #2 and then #3 and skip #4:
If you answered Yes, then go to #4 and skip #2 and #3:
2. How should we restrict their freedom of choice? We should make a list of rules that they must follow at all times and against which any new game can be compared to determine whether or not GOG must release said game on their platform and in their store.
3. Should Hatred, when ran through the list of rules composed in item #2, be released on GOG?
4. How do we punish GOG for choosing a path different than our choice? Probably, given the relatively free market societies we live in, we should let them know with our money how we stand.
Crassmaster
Right bastard
Registered: Sep 2008
From Canada
Posted May 28, 2015
Having a fit and completely contradicting himself - yes
Displaying an ability to put together reasonable conclusions and avoiding hitting himself in the head with things - no
my name is catte
i touch your foods
Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Posted May 28, 2015
In fact, calling others a "moron" for using a word correctly is both ironic and moronic, by the way...
Post edited May 28, 2015 by SirPrimalform
RWarehall
Ja'loja!
Registered: Jan 2012
From United States
Posted May 28, 2015
low rated
GoG's right to decide if they carry a game has nothing to do with the definition of censorship. You are just an ignorant fool who likes to read your own posts. If GoG chose not to carry the game based on Hatred's immoral content, then they are guilty of censorship. Plain and simple.
"Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are "offensive," happens whenever some people succeed in imposing their personal political or moral values on others. Censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private pressure groups."
Straight from the ACLU...
Thus, if GoG refused Hatred for being offensive, they are guilty of censorship cut and dry...
And to all the other people who are seriously misinformed...
It doesn't matter if the agent of censorship is public or private, proof above. You people are creating goal posts which do not exist. In the McCarthy era in the United States, movie directors were blacklisted because of their supposed ties to Communism. They were not allowed to make any movies. This era has been called a bad day for censorship, yet no government agency was involved. The film studios enforced the blacklists. Most of the censorship in this country comes from private industry, such as Clear Channel who owns a lot of radio stations choosing not to play songs country wide because of their content, to Walmart demanding censored versions of rap music else those albums be banned from their stores. The Motion Picture Association of America routinely censors scenes out of movies and is a private organization. All of these things are censorship. Not my fault so many of you are so poorly educated....
Now, I'm not even saying necessarily that GoG isn't releasing it for that reason, I'm not actually sure. But so many of you don't know shit about the words you use, and are just here to cause trouble. Idiots like Breja...
And to all you de-rep trolls. I feel so sorry for you all and your pin dicks. All you assholes can just go fuck yourselves, since if you even have a lady, they are looking for a way out! You are downrepping the people speaking the truth, which makes all of you uninformed fools.
Because GoG "ate" my first post, I even refreshed the thread and it didn't appear. About 10 minutes after my second post, it appeared somehow...
Post edited May 28, 2015 by RWarehall
YaTEdiGo
Vegan Gamer
Registered: Apr 2009
From Taiwan
Posted May 28, 2015
Soooo POSTAL is right, but HATRED no?
amok: So... you are saying that if Hatred gets a good user rating it will be censorship. But for a game like Machines at War 3, which has a positive user rating, it is not censorship.... because it is not controversial enough? I still do not understand how this work...
mobutu: Yea, because Hatred gets outside of the norm, of the established boundaries. This is why some people are very vocal against it. But in the end its just a game ... or atleast this is my take on the matter ;)
And also, look at hotline and postal, two games carried by gog that get compared a lot with hatred.
They are not clear, they let the gamer guess or imagine the violence inside. Heck, hotline is pixelated enough and the gamer mostly imagine how a takedown is performed, he-s not seeing it per se.
But hatred is extremely clear, in-your-face picture-clear, doesn't let any imagination possible ... and this got a lot of people angry. REALLY? I remember being seriously disgusted after playing POSTAL 2 for some hours, and pee, kill, burn, and be as evil as possible ... seriously, I didn´t want to play any violent game or see a violent movie in weeks...
And also, look at hotline and postal, two games carried by gog that get compared a lot with hatred.
They are not clear, they let the gamer guess or imagine the violence inside. Heck, hotline is pixelated enough and the gamer mostly imagine how a takedown is performed, he-s not seeing it per se.
But hatred is extremely clear, in-your-face picture-clear, doesn't let any imagination possible ... and this got a lot of people angry.
Post edited May 28, 2015 by YaTEdiGo
amok
FREEEEDOOOM!!!!
Registered: Sep 2008
From United Kingdom
Posted May 28, 2015
For example:
"The game is good, but we cant" - due to the price point
"The game is good, but we cant" - because you insist on using key activation
"The game is good, but we cant" - because it ran sluggishly on some of our test computers, we are afraid it is not optimised enough for all systems
"The game is good, but we cant" - because the lead designer stole Marcin's girlfriend in Fifth class
And so on. Neither of these reasons have much to do with the quality of the game, and neither is political. But all are just as valid.
And a note on player reviews - I am afraid at least 50% of user reviews would be in the line of: "I can set babies on fire!! LOLZ! Would burn babies again. 10/10" so not sure how those will mean good quality?
Post edited May 28, 2015 by amok
Perturabo.235
Paladin
Registered: Aug 2009
From Poland
Posted May 30, 2015
low rated
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/05/hatred-developer-says-gog-refuses-to-distribute-the-game/
These obnoxious entitled people scare enterprisers into pandering to them, no matter the cost to their employees or to customers that may feel uncomfortable to that sort of thing.
Refusal to distribute Hatred despite finding it interesting and good is an obvious sign of intimidation by the game censorship lover clique which seems to especially want to censor Hatred. Sign of fear that they will boycott G.O.G. on the grounds of carrying Hatred. Of course it assumes that those who would like to buy Hatred in G.O.G. and those who don't care about Hatred but hate censorship won't react with sanctions of their own.
Since G.O.G. has shown that it pays to be obnoxious and entitled, I can't cede the power to the censorship lover clique and will regretfully have to put a one year boycott on G.O.G.
This way whenever they choose to pander to the game censor clique or not, it's a lose/lose choice instead of a win/lose. Of course, it's unfortunate, but sadly it's how this world works.
QC
X-Mas Triforce!!
Registered: Jun 2010
From United States
Posted May 30, 2015
Edit: Nevermind. But anyway, I'm pretty sure a lot of companies are going to avoid it regardless because of negative press. Steam tried to do it. The ESRB gave it an AO rating in the states so all US Retailers will never carry it. You always have options, I would say it's not worth getting upset over.
Post edited May 30, 2015 by QC
darkwolf777
Carpe Cervisiam
Registered: Sep 2008
From United States
Crassmaster
Right bastard
Registered: Sep 2008
From Canada
Posted May 30, 2015
high rated
http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2015/05/hatred-developer-says-gog-refuses-to-distribute-the-game/
These obnoxious entitled people scare enterprisers into pandering to them, no matter the cost to their employees or to customers that may feel uncomfortable to that sort of thing.
Refusal to distribute Hatred despite finding it interesting and good is an obvious sign of intimidation by the game censorship lover clique which seems to especially want to censor Hatred. Sign of fear that they will boycott G.O.G. on the grounds of carrying Hatred. Of course it assumes that those who would like to buy Hatred in G.O.G. and those who don't care about Hatred but hate censorship won't react with sanctions of their own.
Since G.O.G. has shown that it pays to be obnoxious and entitled, I can't cede the power to the censorship lover clique and will regretfully have to put a one year boycott on G.O.G.
This way whenever they choose to pander to the game censor clique or not, it's a lose/lose choice instead of a win/lose. Of course, it's unfortunate, but sadly it's how this world works.
Show me these threats of 'intimidation' from some secret cabal of censorship fanatics. Oh, that's right, it's all implied! You can't see it unless you're looking for it, right? Oh, but people threatening to leave GOG if they don't decide to carry Hatred...that somehow isn't a threat, right? Somehow, that manages to be perfectly benign because REASONS.
Loosen your tin foil hat. You'll probably be more comfortable.
my name is catte
i touch your foods
Registered: Mar 2010
From United Kingdom
Crassmaster
Right bastard
Registered: Sep 2008
From Canada
Posted May 30, 2015
Well, you've let the cat out of the bag now! Dammit, we've worked too hard to have our vast conspiracy fall apart because of this!!
Post edited May 30, 2015 by Crassmaster
@('_')@
Registered: Sep 2012
From United States
Posted May 30, 2015
low rated
Show me these threats of 'intimidation' from some secret cabal of censorship fanatics. Oh, that's right, it's all implied! You can't see it unless you're looking for it, right? Oh, but people threatening to leave GOG if they don't decide to carry Hatred...that somehow isn't a threat, right? Somehow, that manages to be perfectly benign because REASONS.
Loosen your tin foil hat. You'll probably be more comfortable.
Post edited May 30, 2015 by monkeydelarge
@('_')@
Registered: Sep 2012
From United States
Posted May 30, 2015
low rated
So you guys still chomping at the bit for Hatred, because reasons, have fun. I'll play some more Hotline Miami and continue ignoring the game I knew would be "meh" the moment they started feeding the controversy to build hype.