gogtrial34987: The lack of named target for the quote - together with the misquote itself - made it all particularly ambiguous.
The quote was from Yog, I made a number error in hyperlink, nothing else. Yog stated Micro never mentioned Dedo before he said he would not vote Dedo which is not true (he mentioned him once in the very same post and once more before that), I find a little discrepancy.
Is there anything else except me being *ambiguous* on that *hmm* post? Was I wrong with something except for the hyperlink address?
gogtrial34987: Sorry, just to get it absolutely clear: Did you post "Hmm" because you're concerned about yogs, or about micro?
I was concerned for Yog, Micro (had to check his posts) and any player who might have reacted to this - this means You. I hope I was absolutely clear now.
gogtrial34987: Because I haven't had the time to look at more than a small percentage of what you posted...
Not much have changed since then. You are not interested in my posts really, you quote only particular ones for which you might imply some dark meaning, you even called me scum for asking the NK reasons. I hope you know what you are doing. Or maybe you just don't love me for personal reasons to which I'm *oblivious*.
gogtrial34987: How do you see this working? Specifically, "hence" the joke? Does the joke help him gather vote? ...or did you not follow the link, and interpret "Condemner" (trying to get someone else eliminated) as "Jester" (trying to get himself eliminated)?
Yes, it does help Carradice to gain the votes.
I read the link about Condemner - "The Condemner is a third-party role whose win condition is to get a specific person (the Condemnee) voted out, or eliminated"
There is no Jesters in this game.
gogtrial34987: Ooh, I know this one! You're concerned! But... what by? (Me or Carradice?)
Both. Carradice is dead, so it's you now. The fact that you have not voted Carradice adds to that.
gogtrial34987: That there were no other games in which I was on the same team with Carradice, and thus that the Stanley Hotel reference is the only possible one which he could have been referring to.
OK
gogtrial34987: @Cadavar: I would still like answers to the questions I asked end of D1. (#409, #412)
Please check above.
gogtrial34987: Was this honestly happening in real time? As in: you did not spend any time during the night to catch up? Why not?
No and who said it was?
Why? Because I have real life and I wanted to have a break.
Also I secretly expected for the mercy NK but Mafia is too stupid for that! Frigging Mafia!!! - I think you can read it only from Scum!Cadaver because (for you) there is no way for Town!Cadaver to say this.
gogtrial34987: (Useless speculation, for the bragging rights if it turns out to be true: maxleod was killed by a SK, while the mafia NK was prevented somehow. Mafia team consists of Pooka-Lift-Cadaver. Far too neat, so almost certainly not true, but if I'm right, you read it here first!) :P
Pooka-Lift-Cadaver? Sound legit, then my vote on Pooka would mean just an act for the opportunity to switch wagons later on with a good *reason* I believe, a very solid theory actually, I'm impressed (not) with amount of *circumstantial evidences* you gathered.
Do you really think that out of 15 players game there are only 3 Mafia players?
Also check here:
gogtrial34987: What do you mean by this? (That Pooka is a "lazy wagon"?)
Player X did something very bad, for instance *Oopsie, I quick hammered but I was not looking*, everyone shout *Kill the Scum, Town would never do that - let's jump on his wagon right away* hence a *lazy wagon*, a wagon which requires zero commitment to the game, especially beneficial for Mafia.
gogtrial34987: Did you really miss that Carradice claimed in #434? And that his claim was: "My assigned name is Harry Potter and I am Town." but that he said nothing about "Watcher"?
1. I have not said anything about missing post #434.
2. I don't care about Harry Potter and Town - it was not what I meant by *claim*.
3. Did I really miss Carradice claimed Watcher? Yes I did. Carradice died without saying so.
I don't understand your approach.
gogtrial34987: Erm, we were modified Visitors. Not Condemners at all. You seem to continuously be confused about the Condemner role. (ref: #412) Why?
check here:
gogtrial34987: For the third I can see either Dessimu (see #559 for reasoning) or Cadaver (see #519 for reasoning). Neither is a a scum-lock, and I haven't looked at them in full context yet, but either would make sense to me.
Huh, wasn't I a Scum!Cadaver back in post #519?
gogtrial34987: This I can totally read as coming from scum!Cadaver.
Or it's not locked enough for you yet? If I switch my vote from Pooka would it be enough for you maybe?
gogtrial34987: Conflicting with him today doesn't mean a thing; hell, it's half my argument for suspecting Cadaver.
If Pooka is Mafia conflicting with Pooka does not mean I'm either Town or Mafia. It works both ways, how is it enough for your *half argument* even?