OK. With a bit more time I go back a bit and go through some posts one by one.
ZFR: I just realized how bad the "lynch on max votes" rule is for Town on D1.
Normally No-Lynch is worse for Town because there is no wagon to analyse next Day. On the other hand, a Town lynch (which, except in situations where scum show a good amount of inaptitude, almost always happens on D1) means Town have one less player on D2.
The current rule allows scum to have the best of both worlds: They can off a Town player on D1 and leave no wagon to analyse for the next Day.
Normally on D1, scum have to balance between lynching a player while trying to stay of his/her wagon. With this set of rules, scum have to... well do nothing. They can do nothing and know that someone gets lynched anyway. They only have to make sure no 2 players get tied for first place, but that isn't all that difficult.
It goes even further. A tie would be fine for scum too, because it results in a no-lynch. So in this game we not only have to think about quick-hammering but also about the policy of un-hammering / balancing. If someone switches wagons close to the deadline leading to two leading people having the same number of votes on them, a no-lynch occurs instead of a simple-majority lynch.
So scum literally have to do nothing in this game. At least on D1. They can just sit back and relax, unless one of their own is leading. In that case they can just start an alternate wagon and hope for a tie. Let's try to get a regular, absolute-majority lynch going and anyone not willing to participate will be noted.
supplementscene: ... So I read the rules to see if I had caught him out...
Nice! Finally a game where you read the rules! Now the question is: is this meta-change alignment-indicative in one way or the other? ;-)
Welcome Achmed, thanks for stepping in!
ZFR: @gogtrial thanks.
Lifthrasil: Now that's a bold statement for D1. Why are you so sure that one of us is Scum? Joe always reads me as scum, no matter what faction he or I are. So that's NAI. The only way how you could be so sure that one of us is Mafia would be if you were scum together with Joe yourself! So maybe we should start with lynching you instead!
ZFR: I don't care. I've learnt my lesson from the Secret Hitler game and I'm not taking any chances.
Since you don't back that stated opinion up with votes, I guess it is mostly meant as a joke. Everything else would be quite bad anyhow. Wanting to lynch two players because of past games... but you don't really mean it, I guess.
By the way for the record: yes, I think Joe would find me scummy even if we were scum together. At least that's what I would ask him to do. Him finding me towny would just be a breach of character. :-)
trentonlf: someone playing the game and claiming they have not read their PM yet actively posting in the game is acting in an anti team manner.
Carradice: He never said anti team. He said anti game. A very different thing with an already charged expression, especially after the last games. I call this dirty tactics.
Anti-team is anti-game. If you are playing against your own team, you are breaking the game balance. Which is anti-game. So I don't call this dirty tactics. I call your decision not to read your PM anti-game too. Just like Lasers 'Meta-busting' in the last game.
Carradice: Does everything require an explanation? If you do something weird as this and you actually do not know your alignment for one day,
opportunistic fellows and jumpy scum will try to get you lynched on that day. The two kinds of people that I want to vote for first. Bingo.
And this statement is pure BS. It's the old 'act scummy trap' fallacy. If you act weird and someone jumps on it, especially on D1, that just means that they are scum-hunting. To the extent that is possible on D1. They may be true scum-hunting or fake scum-hunting. But saying "I'll vote first for anyone who is actively scum-hunting" (paraphrased) is really, really anti-town. You give a free pass to possible scum, who just coast along and don't react to your weirdness, because they don't care.
supplementscene: You've take Carradice to 3 votes. How likely do you think it is that you've landed on Scum? Because all of his OMGUS suspicions make me think he's probably town.
What? Why? OMGUS is a reaction that is quite often seen from scum that is under pressure. So what makes OMGUS towny in your eyes? For me, the fact that his reads are omgusy make him look rather scummy.
For me, dedo is clearly the more towny in the dedo<-->Carradice conflict. I know, I pointed out that dedo might be mad at Carradice for not playing for his team because they are one scum-team. But I posted that mostly to gauge reaction and for completeness sake. Anyhow, that would only work if Carradice is scum too. So while there is a faint possibility that both dedo and Carradice are scum, I'm getting Town-vibes from dedo and scum-vibes from Carradice.
I would like to vote for Carradice. But we still have ample time and, one thing that makes me hesitate, he is one of the more active players now. As discussed earlier, all scum really have to do in this game is hold back and let the 'simple majority' lynch mechanic work for them.
So, I will have a look at the lurkers tonight before switching my vote. Right now it still feels good to be on Joe. ;-)