It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
adaliabooks: Interesting. Care to share your thoughts on CSPVG?

Also, as far as being consistent across games.. I'd like to think my current play is consistent with the endgame of CSPVG's gameshow (/weird pug) game. It was then that I stopped buying into all the mythos surrounding the game and started looking at it from an entirely different angle, which I find helps immensely.
Would love to. And of course he deserves a chance to respond if he deems it even worth responding to. ;)

Not trying to evade/lurk, but I've had very little internet time today and there was quite a bit of content today to catch up on here and on work email. Also stopped to claim a game I won in GA (syberia) as well as send out a key (Freedom Planet) from Chandoraa's GA before I came over here.

Since he's not exactly on the cusp of being lynched it doesn't exactly seem urgent in any case. I don't think my brilliant insights and gut feelings are going to suddenly swing the room from you to CSP, for better or worse.

Potentially some good RL news, however. I mean, not entirely without cons, since my ex- still thinks ghosts/devils/angels are literally speaking to her, but there's some temperance and doubt there now that maybe she shouldn't do everything they tell her. I mean, that's actually a significant improvement over last week. Progress!
Good news, everyone!

I just got back from a great concert and I have a pretty decent internet access. I have 2 pages worth of content to catch up and I'll try to join in in the next couple of hours.
avatar
Leonard03: I wouldn't say it's an RVS vote, not anymore.
Ok, fair enough.
I shall keep that in mind.

avatar
bler144: Would love to. And of course he deserves a chance to respond if he deems it even worth responding to. ;)

Not trying to evade/lurk, but I've had very little internet time today and there was quite a bit of content today to catch up on here and on work email. Also stopped to claim a game I won in GA (syberia) as well as send out a key (Freedom Planet) from Chandoraa's GA before I came over here.

Since he's not exactly on the cusp of being lynched it doesn't exactly seem urgent in any case. I don't think my brilliant insights and gut feelings are going to suddenly swing the room from you to CSP, for better or worse.

Potentially some good RL news, however. I mean, not entirely without cons, since my ex- still thinks ghosts/devils/angels are literally speaking to her, but there's some temperance and doubt there now that maybe she shouldn't do everything they tell her. I mean, that's actually a significant improvement over last week. Progress!
Oh no, I fully expected to get lynched. I just hope to be able to pick out the full scum team before I do, and I'm not quite sure of my read on CSPVG, so I'd be interested to see why you find he might be scummy.

:(
Sounds like RL is indeed pretty tough for you, hope you can get it sorted (an exorcist maybe? ;) )
Well f*ck this shit! It's 3:30 am and I've been writing for almost 45 minutes now and when I tried to fix a typo with the backspace the browser send me a page back and I lost everything???

@JMich, does that lazarus thing work with the barefoot quick reply in chrome?

I will not post now. Tomorrow, after I wake up. Sorry everyone, but I don't want to re-do it now.
avatar
dedoporno: I will not post now. Tomorrow, after I wake up. Sorry everyone, but I don't want to re-do it now.
Well, technically you did post ;) But I know what you mean, and no sweat.

Ok, so if I ruled the game world I would lynch CSP. The thing that gave me pause was Wyrm's comment that he doesn't want to lynch someone just for proposing something crazy to get Day 1 moving. I do get that, and agree. We all, to some degree or other, think D1 is a problem, thus there's a catch-22 in punishing anyone who tries something unorthodox.

That said, there are two problems with proposing everyone toss out their "most scummy" list off the bat. For one, it makes it apparent who can most easily be wagoned, and two, it gives scum a sense of who might be most dangerous to them. If you read the scum chat from last game, Kryp was hit because of the fact that he had both dedo and RW on his short list, and also was viewed as a crafty player who would find a way to get them if left to linger. Ironically, perhaps, he came off RW in D2 (Krypsyn 2: the undeadening), and dedo was flamed N1 anyway.

The saving grace to the latter part of that proposal in a sense is that it came early enough that it would have been hard for anyone to have a meaningful read on anyone else. So that alone, while it raised a flag, isn't really what got me to the point of leaning towards a vote.

When I compare carryover players from last game to this here are players who read strongly same to me:
Trent, Leonard, JMich, Wyrm, Sage - all of whom, other than JMich were town. But I get the sense JMich will read fairly constant regardless.

Players who read different:
Dedo, Flub, CSP. Flub has been vacuous at times, and his post structure is generally similar, but last game outside of D3/D4 when he was actively bluffing, he had an edge in my perception. This time he's largely just goofing and letting stuff bounce off him.

CSP is harder for me to read, clearly. But that said, the one time last game where I didn't feel he was lurking was D3 when he first made his claim. He was confident, engaged. The rest of the game, even later on in D3 after Yog went at him, he seemed a bit evasive. He confirmed my night visit to RW and then didn't even vote for RW. So what's the theory? The claim in D3 was the time when he knew something he could use.

This game he's been confident, engaged, willing to repeatedly be upfront out of the gate. Which kinda makes me think he knows something. And on D1 town knows nothing, right? Last game I had a N0 action but I still knew absolutely nothing. I think I had another point earlier, but I was thinking about it on the drive down this a.m. and didn't have a chance to make notes.

Now, the alternative hypothesis is that he was uncomfortable with his role last game, or confused by the setup, just having a bad game, or whatever. It's the only sample I have with him, so admittedly it's not a large N. Maybe he's just having a better game, or etc. It's thin enough I wouldn't ask anyone else to pile on for it, but frankly I think everything on the table right now is pretty thin. That's just what my gut is telling me.

It's also part of why I was curious for Flub to lay out his case on CSP, which right now seems even thinner with "he said Jester," which seems a pretty non-reason to vote someone on D1 to me. Even as someone inclined to vote for him, that reads to me as just "thinking out loud" not "scum gambit."

But, since I should put my money where my mouth is: Vote CSP

I have a longer opinion on Adalia as well, but if he's content to be the D1 lynch as he states, by all means I can save it for the post-game. ;) That said, I did laugh at his "I want to call the scum team before I die!" If there was any lingering doubt that he and Wyrm are alike, that pretty much removed it.
My cases:

CSPVG is too cute.

adaliabooks is too skinny.

Bookwyrm627 is too short....and too scummy.

JMich is Five Star inscrutable.

Vitek is not playing.

These are all based on Day One logic....therefore are quite logical.
avatar
dedoporno: Well f*ck this shit! It's 3:30 am and I've been writing for almost 45 minutes now and when I tried to fix a typo with the backspace the browser send me a page back and I lost everything???

@JMich, does that lazarus thing work with the barefoot quick reply in chrome?

I will not post now. Tomorrow, after I wake up. Sorry everyone, but I don't want to re-do it now.
I installed it on Chrome and it works like it should with barefoot essentials. At first I thought it did not as it's hard to see the Lazarus symbol in the upper right corner of your text box, but it is there and does what it should :)

I even refreshed this page before I posted to erase and test it and was able to recover it.
avatar
flubbucket: CSPVG is too cute...

These are all based on Day One logic....therefore are quite logical.
Last game, being on the same D1 wagon as Krypsyn gave me confidence. This game, being on the same wagon as Flub makes me think I should call my psychiatrist to up my meds.
avatar
trentonlf: I installed it on Chrome and it works like it should with barefoot essentials. At first I thought it did not as it's hard to see the Lazarus symbol in the upper right corner of your text box, but it is there and does what it should :)

I even refreshed this page before I posted to erase and test it and was able to recover it.
I will probably need some additional help since right now I can't seem to make it work :(

Anyway, I'm not sure what to add.

I'm gone for a day and people start talking about jesters and cults? This is probably one of the most unhelpful topics we can focus on D1 and it's only good for distracting us from actual scumhunting. It seems to have gone down a bit so let's keep it that way.

I like JMich's #255 since it marks most of the thoughts I have regarding what Adalia has been saying and then some. Even we really are misreading what he's suggesting or there is a fair amount of going back and forth with whatever he [Adalia] actually means and is selling which doesn't look great on D1 where we have too few straws to grasp at anyway.

In terms of consistency I do seem to recall Adalia playing the numbers game at some point in the past (I know Yog did it quite often, but I believe Adalia also did some time ago - correct me if I'm wrong) but this is the very first time I have been introduced to the notion that townies dying is actually quite nice for us. Poor scum have been doing our plays for us this whole time and I thought I knew how this game is supposed to be played.

I've never been so wrong in all my life! (See, Adalia? This is how it's done :P)

avatar
adaliabooks: You say your not willing to lynch someone for 'the numbers' but by voting me that's exactly what you're doing.
You did suggest to just pick someone and start voting for them, no? I believe this is more or less what's been happening anyway. The votes aren't even that random - they have a somewhat decent base (in the context of D1 at least) so that's even better. Also, you did state that you are OK with being the target for this. All in all things should be in line with your own suggestion anyway.

On a side note I believe Adalia should consider offering some sort of remuneration for Wyrm who seems to have been acting as his attorney for the past couple of days. Pro-bono is nice too, but Wyrm did make quite the effort, so I think he deserves it. I'm not sure if he's a townie that is trying to back a person who's sharing their own thoughts, a scum buddy who is trying a bit too hard to get his pal off the hook or a scum who is assisting a player he knows isn't scum to gain town points after said player flips (I went the same way with Wyrm in the last game, actually). I believe this is an interesting interaction that has to be observed regardless of what actually happens.

Things didn't take another course in the short time I was away and since we are starting to roll slightly faster and bler asked for my vote I can now

vote adaliabooks

more comfortably.
avatar
bler144: I have a longer opinion on Adalia as well, but if he's content to be the D1 lynch as he states, by all means I can save it for the post-game. ;) That said, I did laugh at his "I want to call the scum team before I die!" If there was any lingering doubt that he and Wyrm are alike, that pretty much removed it.
Great post and some good reads, thanks for sharing your views on CSPVG, it's partially why I've been suspicious of him although there are other reasons, which I will have to wait till later tonight or tomorrow to share as I'm working today and it will require going back through his posts.

Please do share your opinion on me. I don't mind being the day 1 lynch, it was somewhat part of the plan, but I'd rather hit scum if we can, and I think we have a chance of that.
Hey, I think I've got at least two of them already... by the time the hammer comes I might have the other/rest. It's my duty as town to share :)

@dedo
Phone posting so can't multi quote.
Excellent, glad you came back in time to jump on, I wouldn't have expected anything less. And with what amounts to the "adalia told us to vote for him!" excuse no less. I do so love it when I'm right.

Carry on.
avatar
bler144: ...
For my taste you base too much of your read on the last play. I see that as problematic, especially after having played only one game with the target. If someone always plays in a certain way and then suddenly changes that might means something - whatever that might be. But one game is not enough to get to know someones playstyle. At least not enough to base a vote on a deviation from the previous game's playstyle. Also people change - or sometimes even learn.

But apart from the comparisions to the previous play you might have a point that asking for a list of standard suspects might have been a scum move. But at least it got us talking. So it might just have been an attempt to start conversation which hadn't been fully thought through in it's consequences. All in all you made a good post, but I don't agree on placing CSPVG on the top spot. Both flubbucket (for his uselessing) and adalia (for the reasons explained in the vote) look more likely to be scum to me.



avatar
bler144: Last game, being on the same D1 wagon as Krypsyn gave me confidence. This game, being on the same wagon as Flub makes me think I should call my psychiatrist to up my meds.
And yes, you should do that! ;-) Flubb appears even stranger than usual in this game.
avatar
bler144: ...
avatar
Lifthrasil: For my taste you base too much of your read on the last play. I see that as problematic, especially after having played only one game with the target. If someone always plays in a certain way and then suddenly changes that might means something - whatever that might be. But one game is not enough to get to know someones playstyle. At least not enough to base a vote on a deviation from the previous game's playstyle. Also people change - or sometimes even learn.
As someone who tends to largely base reads on meta behaviour and previous games I don't see a problem with that, but I can see why you would be concerned when bler has only played one game and therefore hasn't got much to compare to.
But do you find his reads to be inaccurate? I think he was spot on in most cases, with just a few minor adjustments that I might make to his lists.
So while he may not be in the best position to make the call, I feel he's made a good call anyway.
Leonard03

QuadrAlien

[Replacement for]Sage103082


/ponder
If we are going by meta, I will be very reluctant to vote for flub without compelling arguments. He does remind me of his play a few games ago, and unless my memory fails me, he was town in that game.
Then again, the last few games he was a teammate of me, so I might be a bit biased ;)
(slowly sobers up) Pardon me. Leaving party for a colleague last night.

I'll catch up once I'm feeling a bit better, but I have to ask - was there something I did wrong in my vote formatting in Post #235? I did at least attempt to change my vote. :)