Prepare to be decimated cause from what I've experienced they pretty close mind over here and can't even cope with criticism towards GOG Curation system which seems biased as hell. GOG might have its fair share of SJW but at least your not dictated on which games you must play, Unlike here on GOG.

I personally also believe in Free speech, But sadly most people can't cope with people being honest so they must put on this face mask and pretend to be somebody they are not. Also, Don't even dare call somebody simply stupid here cause that gets you banned for 5 days. Basically, nothing is allowed only praising GOG and acting like SJW and talk about simple things and never question anything or else this community gets triggered.

Gotta love when they say don't talk politics while those SJW pushed politics and Race/Gender and even Identity politics into gaming. seems it ok to push politics in games but you can't talk about it regardless of them being there.

Freedom of speech is dead and as far I recall if you wanna talk them without being censored I'd suggest ''One Angry Gamer'' which keeps track of all the agenda pushing and pandering in the gaming world and if you want for movies ''Bounding into comics'' But true freedom of speech has been dead on the internet since the casuals entered that domain.

After redoing test (some answers depend), I got Chaotic Neutral. But I always have higher scores in Chaos, Good and both Neutrals than you.

Alignment:
Lawful Good ----- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (14)
Neutral Good ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (20)
Chaotic Good ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (24)
Lawful Neutral -- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (17)
True Neutral ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (23)
Chaotic Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (27)
Lawful Evil ----- XXX (3)
Neutral Evil ---- XXXXXXXXX (9)
Chaotic Evil ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXX (13)

Law & Chaos:
Law ----- XX (2)
Neutral - XXXXXXXX (8)
Chaos --- XXXXXXXXXXXX (12)

Good & Evil:
Good ---- XXXXXXXXXXXX (12)
Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (15)
Evil ---- X (1)

My conclusion is that you are closer to True Neutral than I am.

Discs? That'd be a gramophone here.

Phonograph = cylinders
Gramophone = 78rpm shellac discs

SHIT
you're right
I'm an idiot! XD

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go play my guitar.

Ah, good old Fender Parpocaster.

You must watch another tournament than me. ;)

You would if you were a true Ubermensch! ;p

We should discuss this at some point, I think. :o

Well I'm sure it wouldn't seem so fast if I wasn't so heavily medicated. :P



THAT WAS A JOKE!
I am still on the wagon, knock on wood.

Gog is paying for these forums, they have a perfect right to enforce whatever rules they want.

And I am not a big fan of anything goes anyway. I give you 4CHan as an example of what results from no control whatever.

Gog may be paying for the forums but they will turn people away from them if they went overboard(Not likely but just as an example) on what's not allowed.

Like say for example if they arbitrarily said one genre of game was verboten to speak of that many liked.

=======================

Clarification: 4Chan(and also reddit) isn't 100% anything goes.....they delete anything against US law(iirc). Stuff like direct threats/etc have been taken down/their posters banned/their posters reported to authorities in the past.

Also i'd rather have that system(everything goes barring anything illegal in one's country/etc) than one where a site owner dictates what they allow based on personal taste.

(By site owner I mean for big sites, not very small forums run by a handful of people)

You also should want such sites around, as with "hate" changing definition from person to person and company to company(and even within those groups over time) i'd rather have a nearly everything goes site than one where the goalposts on what is isn't allowed keeps changing over time/is overly confusing & can lead to what one likes to talk about suddenly(though not always) becoming verboten speech the next day/week/month/etc as social stigma/tastes/offenses shift.

They can impose all the rules they wish(and I would follow even the silly ones if need be) but they would likely lose customers fast(or forum users who spread their product/site info to others) if they did so....if not garner some bad PR at the very least.

This is likely why any forum owner(with exceptions) doesn't go full orwellian with the rulesets. Of course, there have been times when they DID do such on some sites, and those sites suffered a mass exodus due to it(Like tumblr's lewd matter ban, for example, and the content creator purges on youtube to a smaller degree).

(On a similar tangent I am ok with smaller sites imposing such rules but not the bigger ones, and if the stuff to regulate them passes I will be happy/ok with it)

==========================

They are likely doing so to be nice to the users and also to not get bad PR if they went overboard with banning many people or increasing the rules on the forums to an insane degree.

(As for that term: I myself use it to ONLY mean those on either side who are extremists who use social movements for bad/self serving purposes and NOT all activists. Of course, there are likely a handful of people who use it like you describe, sadly.)

Yes.

To be fair he's likely not the only one....and some may be right that some people think that way( a small group).

Duh.

It's just very hilarious, how such people as dudalb rant about white men "being a threat" and then accuse everyone else of insulting people "because of their race, sex or relgion". And no wonder that these exact people say that "private corporations don't need to protect freedom of speech", but when it comes to their protection against "hate speech" or some enforcement of "diversity and inclusivity", those pirvate corporations immediately should comply for some reason.