Well, that's why I wished I'd played it differently. Fwiw, the main reason I held off is I wasn't sure if that would give anyone who hadn't claimed and was going bluff that it was safe to claim it. Which turned out to be irrelevant because I should've realized it's just the safest space to fake claim even if one villager is confirmed.
I also thought the math was more in my favor, but once I remembered which excel formula does that type of statistical distribution(hypgeomdist), yeah, my initial proposition was 89% likely to occur randomly. (I'd have to double check, but I think cristi's was like 43%). I'd assumed it was like 50/50 but then I hadn't really thought it that much. I thought the fact that I came out of the game with the robber claim would be clearing, though I guess Drealmer's right that it doesn't clear <what> I did with the role.
I also had this weird sense HSL was eyeing me and Drealmer both and that me acknowledging it was wouldn't clear anything anyway.
Though the way all the claims played out, again, unless a townie is lying, the only way it even could be a me/drealmer team at this point is if cristi is true and zeo is lying. Which does appear the likelier scenario, so IDK.
That said, again, relying on meta a bit, if I were going to be scum, I would've prepared way better. Other than the question in the thread, the only questions I PMed dedo were about how my role worked. I kinda thought it was as simple as just hope I don't rob a wolf (success), tease a claim->claim (fail?), and focus on who was lying.
But instead, this isn't even a game about figuring out who's lying, it's sorting the <pool> of liars, and then figuring out why they're each lying.
If HSL did (or claims he did) swap me with someone, my answer's still going to be the same. I robbed Drealmer, drealmer was villager. That's it.