JoeSapphire: Lift - you misread me, I should have written "Joe, Pooka or GameRager-to-avoid-no-lynch" sorry.
So my question was - is it only GameRager you're willing to vote to avoid no-lynch?
I actually have made an argument against you but now that I look back on it I put it in away that is difficult to pay attention to.
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_63_supernatural/post125 I compare two of Lift's posts. The first says "Joe is typically nonsensical" and the second "Joe voted me: his play is erratic: he must die" Some contradiction there, no?
Lift - how certain are you that I'm scum, based on this strategy I've taken up? Well I guess based on anything.
To defend myself - I don't think I'd take up this exciting and attention-seeking strategy if I were mafia. I think I tend to forget to seek attention as mafia by way of being distracted. But maybe I'm wrong... Lift, what do you reckon?
---
Pooka voting for lift like he meant to all the time gives me a bit of uneasiness... A lot actually
1. No, not only GR, of course. If there were only one wagon on one player whom I didn't have on my radar at all and voting him were the only way to avoid a no-lynch, I would reluctantly join that train or hammer. I firmly believe that a lynch on D1 is necessary for Town. The people I mentioned were just the ones that stand out.
2. so your argument is, that I'm too friendly? But you say yourself that that's no real reason.
3. There is a difference between playful nonsense and an actual vote. A vote out of RVS is no joke. It carries weight and even for you it is strange that you vote without reason when the deadline approaches.
4. Not at all certain. But why would you choose this attention-seeking 'strategy' if you were Town? You are wasting time chasing someone who you have no real reason to suspect. As I said before, whatever you are, this is anti-town play and you are experienced enough to know that. So your 'strategy' doesn't make sense with you!Town or you!Scum really. So I wonder what you are up to. But in any case, you stick out and are strange and on D1 that is enough to base a case on, until something better comes along.
5. So, Pooka gives you a lot of uneasiness - and yet you keep your vote on the target you don't have any real reason to vote for. Interesting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PookaMustard: My top priority is Lift. As said earlier, he seems to be building up to get me lynched, now that RVS. I can see him diverting to Joe as a damage control tactic: the post where he votes Joe says that RFG and I are right about him being inconsistent, even. Perhaps he wants to avoid the whole deal of "but you said the same things to RW" and leave me for later. I believe his lynch will be more informative and more likely to hit scum.
I was also willing to lynch either RFG or agent, perhaps Joe as a distant third to this pack, but I'd like to see how they develop during the remainder of Day 1 or on Day 2 to see if any of them need commitment, as I feel they wouldn't be as productive as a Lift lynch.
You got that backward. You see me mentioning things that are a bit suspicious about you as 'building up' a case against you? Even though I only mention you as possible alternative lynch? And you see the person I actually build a case against and vote against as 'mere distraction and damage control'? ... Why would I have to control any damage? And why is a person, who votes without having a reason to do so, a 'distant third' for you, while a person that states he would vote you to avoid a no-lynch is your top scum pick?
Either you are awfully self-centered so that you see any mention of you as possible lynch as an attack on you. Or you do have reason to be sensitive to be suspected in this game. Maybe I was wrong and you are actually the more scummy one. Why else would you be so over-sensitive to being suspected? Town doesn't have reason to be such. We know that we more often than not suspect each other. Yes, I reacted to Joe's vote on me as well. But that wasn't because he suspected me. It sticks out because he voted without voicing any suspicion.
Oh by the way. Yes, NOW I am building a case against you. Or more precisely, you did build a case against yourself. Maybe I was wrong and you are actually scummier that Joe's strange behavior is. But before I possibly switch my vote, to you, let me ask you: are there any reasons you suspect me that aren't related to what I said about you? Anything suspicious relating to another player? Or do you only react to suspicion placed on yourself?
