yogsloth: So.
Post
863: Krypsyn votes for agent, without giving a reason, other than Ix isn’t Scum. After
asking him about it, and getting a
vauge and meaningless answer, trent seems to agree and votes agent immediately thereafter in 883, despite replying to Ix about something completely different.
Post
955 Krypsyn changes his mind, votes for mchack based purely on PM formatting. One post later, trent (despite railing against this very thing) agrees and votes mchack as well.
1325 Krypsyn votes adaliabooks with literally no reason and 10 posts later, trent jumps on board again.
trentonlf sure seems to be a fan of Krypsyn’s logical abilites this game.
I have not based any of my votes on Kryspyn's logical abilities as you put it. Any vote I have placed I have given reasons for, and none of them started with "based on Krypsyn's logic".
I am still against, and will always be against, PM discussion. When mchack posted his role information it looked to be based on the OP and not what was in the PM. If anyone is going to try and reveal PM info they deserve to be lynched, especially if they get caught lying. It would teach a lesson that revealing PM info is not a good idea. It breaks games and is a weak play. Now Quad has stepped in and said we can't base anything on that and so now mchack gets a free pass because the mod defended him. As I've already said, I would still be voting mchack if I thought it would go anywhere, but I don't think it will.