tag+: Why would you need to run risks? Seriously.
Well, I never said I did (some free DLC aside) or was going to. Just interested to see who might have, to great benefit. Life is about risk in any case ... risk nothing you get nothing. That said, you do have to be smart about risk.
tag+: DLCs to me mean a low respect from the devs/publishers to give us complete games (Stretching it a huge little: A dishonest practice).
Granted, we could talk deep enough about the pros DLCs also have like keeping fresh &alive a game, extend your investment through new campains with lesser investment, and so on. But... we could also find the tricky dishonest part on them. Why are out there successful games that do not need DLCs then?
While I accept that some DLCs are indeed a shonky practice, there are many that aren't, especially Expansion packs and similar, or even soundtracks etc on occasion.
I don't mind the developer, backed by the publisher, getting further support for their game. In one sense at least, and I am sure there are others, it keeps the game alive and more likelihood of bug fixes happening. Many game providers are all too happy to move onto their next production.
So what matters, is that the base game is decent on its own, without any DLC, plus any forthcoming DLC are either free if just something basic like a skin, or a decent fair price if something more. I'm a fan of more variety of choice in a game, and many DLC offer that.
tag+: Sorry to finish answering your question with a rethorical question:
Would you join the questionable practice doing something similar?
No idea at this point. It would likely depend on the game and provider.
tag+: I invite you to be patient enough instead or consider No-DLC games :)
I am already doing that, been doing that a long time.
But I am open to other possibilities, hence my query.
tag+: Wise words man! Thanks for sharing, I like them. I will make an effort to remember, having you as the autor.
The closer wisdom reference I have is an anecdote I read somewhere talking how in the past pinnaples and other nowadays common fruits were exclusive of Kings.... mindblowing. Without noticing it, the variety in many areas we enjoy today is worthy of Kings :)
Indeed and thanks. In some ways it is like mind over matter. You don't indeed need to be a King or Queen to feel like one. I find there is some sense of freedom in taking that approach, especially in a world where everyone wants to control your life in some way. What matters in the end is your own sense of satisfaction ... or level of it.
That said, it doesn't mean you should rely too much on worldly possessions. I also get a lot of joy in other areas of my life. As they say though, every bit helps. :)
amok: No, not really. I do my research before buying the game so I know what kind of game it is, and I don't really buy that many games. I have an OK job so I make enough to have a bit extra. I also know that developers depend on making monies to be able to make more games, so I have no problem with supporting those I like when I know I will be playing their game.
Fair enough, each to their own. :)