It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
On March 31st we are going to discontinue the Fair Price Package program. Let us explain the reasoning behind this decision.

We came up with Fair Price Package (FPP) as a way to make up the price difference between various countries. Some games on GOG.COM have regional pricing, meaning the price of the same game in one place can be higher compared to its price in North America. In countries where the game is more expensive, we give users the equivalent of the price difference in GOG Wallet funds. In actual numbers, on average, we give users back 12% of the game price from our own pocket. In some cases, this number can reach as high as 37%.

In the past, we were able to cover these extra costs from our cut and still turn a small profit. Unfortunately, this is not the case anymore. With an increasing share paid to developers, our cut gets smaller. However, we look at it, at the end of the day we are a store and need to make sure we sell games without a loss.

Removing FPP is not a decision we make lightly, but by making this change, we will be able to offer better conditions to game creators, which — in turn — will allow us to offer you more curated classic games and new releases. All DRM-free.

We wanted to make sure you have some lead time to still benefit from the Fair Price Package. The program will last until the 31st of March, 2019, so if you would like to take advantage of it, now is the time. The funds you gather from the program will keep the 12 months expiration date from the moment you’ve been granted your last funds.
high rated
First of all, thank you for your support. This was not an easy decision to discontinue the FPP program and we're grateful to you for understanding the reasons behind it. We see that quite a few of you raised concerns about GOG's future. As a part of publicly traded company, we can't comment on any financial results until they are officially reported, but we want to ensure you everything is good with GOG. Being part of a big gaming company, some reports - especially some given by significant media outlets - can often sound much scarier than reality.

You've been also concerned about your access to the games you’ve purchased on GOG. We've covered this topic years ago and it's been in our User Agreement for a long time (please check the section 17.3). This is not only a legal obligation to you but a core part of our ethics as a company.

But don’t worry, all is good, and we have a great plan for the future of GOG. We can’t wait for you to see some of the exciting things we have coming very soon.

EDIT: pinned
Post edited February 26, 2019 by elcook
avatar
fonwick: The stand-alone installers on GoG try to shove Galaxy down my throat every time but I can
at least block the 'GoG-only DRM' and close the process at install. Odd how the 'optional
client' takes so much user effort to decline on every .. single.. product install..
The easy solution to this is to be a Linux gamer. No Galaxy for Linux!!
I hate to agree on this but from a business standpoint it's understandable why they've decided to do this. Times are changing rapidly and the success of GOG depends on developers and publishers not shying away from the GOG platform anymore than they already are. No doubt, this is going to hurt a lot of people not just from the EU but Canada (as much as people want to say we're exempt from these problems - it's much worse).

I will continue to keep my eyes open for upcoming titles. I'm just hoping that later down the line they don't start effecting other things like no more wallet funds, pricing only in USD or even what they stand for that's keeping them in business - (being DRM-free) because that will surely kill long-term consumers and any newcomers to the platform.

Here's to hoping GOG can pull through tougher times ahead.
low rated
avatar
Reglisse: So only the DRM free thing is better than Steam now?
And I get 10% off from Humble for Steam keys + Steam is Linux friendly.
Should I continue to support GOG?
I bought some games twice because no Linux support here...
I'm sad now T_T
It's the end?
avatar
hummer010: The choice.
Choice between Steam Linux Launcher and GOG Galaxy without Linux...So a lot of games with Linux Support on Steam and not here.
Because some new games seem to need Galaxy and without Galaxy no Linux version on GOG.
As for DRM,a lot of my games on Steam are DRM free,I can copy them on another PC and they run without Steam installed.
Steam is like a cash desk in a store...you use it to pay.
You are not forced to buy DENUVO shit.
Those are true DRM infested games for me.
avatar
fonwick: The stand-alone installers on GoG try to shove Galaxy down my throat every time but I can
at least block the 'GoG-only DRM' and close the process at install. Odd how the 'optional
client' takes so much user effort to decline on every .. single.. product install..
avatar
hummer010: The easy solution to this is to be a Linux gamer. No Galaxy for Linux!!
Tux +1
(sadly not all games work well under Linux. think SteamOS was working to fix that *cough* #sadface)
avatar
Breja: It's bad timing becuase this news gives credence to all the negative rumors, thereby putting GOG in an even worse situation.
For me - it's better to hear all the bad news at once. =)

But hey - GOG still #1 for me.
Keep up the good work, GOG stuff !
Understandable. I don't feel I've personally benefited that much from this program, but it was one of those small welcoming gestures towards your clients. it's nice you've kept it up for as long as you could.
avatar
hummer010: The easy solution to this is to be a Linux gamer. No Galaxy for Linux!!
avatar
fonwick: Tux +1
(sadly not all games work well under Linux. think SteamOS was working to fix that *cough* #sadface)
For me the biggest issue is that gog doesn't offer patches for Linux games. Every time there is an update for a game on Linux I have to download the whole game again. Gog is the only game store that doesn't offer patches for Linux.
It's roughly about 50 buck from Fair Price Package in my current wishlist. No wonder that it costs much :/
avatar
hummer010: The choice.
avatar
Reglisse: Choice between Steam Linux Launcher and GOG Galaxy without Linux...So a lot of games with Linux Support on Steam and not here.
Because some new games seem to need Galaxy and without Galaxy no Linux version on GOG.
As for DRM,a lot of my games on Steam are DRM free,I can copy them on another PC and they run without Steam installed.
Steam is like a cash desk in a store...you use it to pay.
You are not forced to buy DENUVO shit.
Those are true DRM infested games for me.
^
the 'super hard' DENUVO-like rubbish and such is easy to avoid with SteamEnhanced as it mentions any known 3rd party DRM
https://pcgamingwiki.com/ is a great source that mentions the engine per-game as well.
(PCGW has a 'GOG.com Enhancement Project' as well which really is the information that GoG should just be offering as it is but heck..)
Since prices in my region are usually comparable to prices set for north-European countries, I can't say I'm particularly happy to see this go away, but hey, if it makes you more profitable or helps keep things afloat, do what you've got to do. Just don't give up on the DRM-free-ness 'cause then you'll be out of business :).
Post edited February 26, 2019 by WinterSnowfall
high rated
I wish there was a funny way of transmitting how defeated I felt when I noticed the announcement, but I can't figure it out. I'm here thinking of how enthusiastic I was about GOG five years ago, buying gfits for friends and shilling it all around; but somehow with each announcement things just become worse.

All my good will for this store has been slowly eroded and I just don't care anymore.

I wish I could get excited about the whole "better deals for developers might mean more titles here", but I already went through that when regional pricing was initially introduced and such; not impressed by the results then and I very much doubt it will be different now.

Edit: I don't think I saw this video linked on the thread yet, so there it goes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRdfYwvGTos
Post edited February 26, 2019 by P1na
low rated
Never understood what FPP is or what it did, but since I live in NA, it seemed that it didnt affect me. maybe an explanation to this will be nice.
high rated
avatar
P1na: I wish there was a funny way of transmitting how defeated I felt when I noticed the announcement, but I can't figure it out. I'm here thinking of how enthusiastic I was about GOG five years ago, buying gfits for friends and shilling it all around; but somehow with each announcement things just become worse.

All my good will for this store has been slowly eroded and I just don't care anymore.

I wish I could get excited about the whole "better deals for developers might mean more titles here", but I already went through that when regional pricing was initially introduced and such; not impressed by the results then and I very much doubt it will be different now.

Edit: I don't think I saw this video linked on the thread yet, so there it goes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRdfYwvGTos
+1 - for all the goodwill GOG have eroded through the shutdown stunt / regional pricing / DLCs & multple editions of titles... etc etc... there really wasn't much of a payoff in all the titles that they got onboard the first time... what makes this any different... games still won't come here...
Post edited February 26, 2019 by Bigs
low rated
avatar
PixelBoy: It wasn't implemented well at all, because they (=GOG) didn't have any compensation when they introduced it.
They only added that because there was a massive wave of complaints from the users.

I guess we have now reached a point where GOG really doesn't care about its users anymore.
avatar
BreOl72: Do you ever read what you write?
I mean from time to time...before you post it?
Because from my standing point, it sure doesn't seem so.
Which part of that would be incorrect?
It is a well documented fact that they introduced it only because there were more negative feedback on that than they have ever received before.

Don't believe me, Google it. It's true.


And if GOG...

1) promises worldwide prices
2) introduces local pricing against their previous promises
3) creates a compensation package because of user feedback
4) announces to cancel the compensation system

...it should be clear to anyone that GOG doesn't have any real interest in keeping their stance one way or the other, they keep on going back and forth based on whatever they believe to be the most profitable thing.

That's OK, that's capitalism.
But they, as in GOG, have all the time claimed that they care about games and gamers and all that, if they actually did, they wouldn't have changed the one world model to begin with.

If there's anything there that isn't factually correct, point it out.


avatar
PixelBoy: That's OK, I don't really care about GOG anymore as a user.
avatar
BreOl72: Which is made very clear from almost every of your posts - including this one.

GOG cut their profit to give you ungrateful POS (pardon my french) a financial compensation.
Which you, of course, just took as a granted right, which you were entitled to, without ever thanking them.
Why should I thank them?
They promised one world prices. Everything after that is something else than what they told their early customers.
I would thank them for going back to their original model, if they ever did, but which they won't.

I have bought hundreds of games from GOG, and recommended their store (earlier version of it) to other people. That should be more than enough to be a "thank you" to them. That is what has paid their salaries for the last 10 years.


avatar
PixelBoy: Then the EPIC store came along, and out of a sudden a certain subset of GOG users complained about how "greedy" GOG is, because they still took a 30% cut, when EPIC (and probably itchio) took much less.
Question: were you one of those who complained about GOG's 30% revenue cut?
I have a feeling, you might be.
I don't care about it either way, that's between the publisher/developer and GOG.
Of course it would be nice to have a system where developers get the money they deserve. But if I buy tomatoes from supermarket, I really don't know how much the farmer gets.


avatar
PixelBoy: And now, when they (seemingly) want to reduce their revenue cut in favour of the devs/publishers and have to stop their "Fair Price Package" which they only introduced because of entitled brats like yourself, if they want to keep the store open - surprise, surprise...look who's here to blame GOG again, and who declares to not give a shit about them?
What matters is what GOG has publicly stated and whether they follow their promises on that. I don't see how it is being an "entitled brat" to ask companies to offer the kind of service that they initially promised. I guess in your worldview it doesn't matter how companies treat people, as it apparently is OK for you to result to personal attacks too.

I never made any special demands towards GOG, but I do point out where GOG acts against those principles which they presented to me 10 years ago when I first bought games from them.

If they no longer want to follow any of their old promises, then obviously they don't care about their old customers either. That's an observation and simple deduction, which once again can be checked by reading interviews they gave about their service back in 2008-2010 timeframe.
high rated
I'll buy Linux games on GOG until the end of the world but I'm not pleased to see all incentives stripped away.
And...I already said how much I HATE the new front page with enabled video?