Bodies of any s*x(or the correct more accurate scientific term...I am not a doctor or such so I don't know what that is offhand) would be more appropriate....or bodies of any build even.....as gender is a social construct/mental construct(as they say) and a physical body cannot be something like that(afaik).

And where exactly "right to exist" is mentioned? Not to mention denied.

Even if I stop, all of his posts are still going to be low rated because there are A LOT of people in here who neg him. Point being, I'm going to get blamed for it either way.

And on a side note, to all, contrary to popular belief, I am NOT a hacker, nor do I have alts or any kind of a rep bot, or any kind of army. I really only correspond daily with two or three people in PM here, one person in Steam. Even if I wanted an army it wouldn't work because my fan club meets in a phone booth.
I seriously doubt anyone is going to believe that but their faith is kind of out of my hands

It only takes 5 or so to downrate posts, so I doubt it's a ton of people(else gog would be getting massive amounts of complaints on me and taking action). Also ANY good action helps and shows one has character and backs up their claims of wanting such on the forums.

You want the forums to be a better place? Make it happen by being a better person and showing how people should act via posts/etc.

As for an "army": A couple people here have stated to me via PM/in posts that you sent them PMs full of info(some false) about me to persuade them to dislike me. Are they all liars?

With how you react to me posting and being here, I cannot discount such words 100% or easily.

This thread is so full of strawmen, blanket statements and ad hominems that I actually puked a little in my mouth. A discussion doesn't get any dumber than two sides pretending not to understand each other just to be able to throw more fallacies at the opponent.

It would help if you mentioned any GOOD or decent posts you saw or the stances in such, and also added your own more wise words to the debate.

I expected nothing?

Apologies! I guess I wrongly assumed your first language was English. But it seems a bit odd then to speak for what most would assume.

It is, you just used the wrong words to describe what the OP was saying/doing.

Also as for what most would assume...do you mean assume OP was trying to say such people shouldn't exist? If so I don't assume such without proof. OP only said he thinks such people are "lesser", not that he doesn't want them to exist. As such, I give him the benefit of the doubt as I cannot prove such things about them.

Ah, then I used the term incorrectly, I am new to this whole gender politics thing.

I cant understand what s this thread about.

Cyberpunk's universe has allowed body modifications since the very beginning. Plus there is a whole cast of trans- characters. Again, IN GAME'S UNIVERSE BY ITS OWN (which weren't created by cdpr), NOT EXCLUSIVELY IN THIS GAME. Why all hate?

Like really - Im sick of companies that add characters of thousand genders and races into their games just for the sake of inclusivity, ruining the whole author's vision and sometimes even common sense (battlefield v is a great example of that). But if it was part of game's universe since the very beginning - why stand against it?

Or is there something, Im missing?

Obviously you aren't part of the global elite, because they couldn't be any happier with the results of their social engineering. lol

You're going on about 'wanting to exist' again :D. What is your first language, maybe I can find a way to communicate my point better to you. As for now, perhaps this example would help:

'There are GamePagers and FameRagers, there's no such thing as a GameRager, and anyone who disagrees needs to be villified and boycotted because they're catering to SJWs and PC, when they should only cater to me '.

Hope that helps!

Op said(very poorly and nastily) they were against what you are: Pandering to groups to sell games(as well as some other things they were wrong on).

What I find interesting is...

The DNA of RPGs is choice -- choice in quests, choice in conversations, choice in character creation. CDPR's expansion of character creation in fact gives more choice.

How some are conflating this addition as somehow a reduction is beyond me.

Then there are people angry that this addition is "turning our children _____."

I've heard that before...

... in the 1950's it was comic books were turning our children into murderous juvenile delinquents (watch Comic Book Confidential).

... in the 1960's it was rock music was driving kids into insane sex fiends... and yes... murderous

.... in the 1970's it was Dungeons & Dragons was making our children into devil worshippers

... in the late 1980's/1990's it was video games and rap music making our kids into killers

Remember how playing as Lara Crofft (Tomb Raider) was supposed to be making boys into girls?!

etc... etc... etc...

Good example, but to me saying something doesn't exist doesn't mean it doesn't exist(usually).

Also if you mean genders than to me ALL genders don't exist as they are all social constructs. Of course that doesn't negate people believing in such or making new ones....that is just the stance I hold.

You and others seem to not be getting why this upsets some people...it's not the inclusion of such and more choice....it's WHY they usually add such(to sell copies to those in said groups and their supporters).

I agree more choice is usually a good thing, overall, and that OP was upset over nothing.

As for "turning our children..."....OP might be wrong and most such beliefs might also be wrong but it doesn't disqualify ALL such statements by default.

Addition: Even though such things are unproven about media that you listed we still limit the usage of such by minors because they are impressionable and easier to manipulate.