Posted August 19, 2018
babark: Are gorefest books labelled "horror" an actual thing you have to look out for? I thought that was only in movies. I've never heard of a horror book that gets its horrorness from indepth or vivid descriptions of gore...
If I remember well, Stephen King mentionned somewhere that, while gore is a cheap trick in literature, he sometimes resorts to it in order to gross out and shock the reader. But it's not his main tool, and it never really seemed forced or out of place to me. Still, apparently it sometimes seemed so to himself. But all genres exist in literature. I'd say that gorefest tend to be low quality, cheap horror, that doesn't get as much success and visibility as other novels, but there is a whole world of gore and sex pulp fictions, and some hilarious websites that review them (more or less sarcastically, but my preferred exemple is in french, sorry) or parody them (garth marenghi's website was fantastic, unfortunately only readable on internet archives anymore - well, there's still the series of course).
In particular, old popular lowbrow spy or crime novels, industrially churned out by more or less legit writers (often switching pseudonyms), could be heavy on self-righteous violence. The 'Bulldog Drummond' series may be a popular exemple, often mentionned by Kingsley Amis in defense of Ian Fleming (to show how dignified and civilized Fleming was in comparison). But the most spectacular exemples are obscure throwaway series. I can only guess that the same must exist in the horror-fantasy genre.
At the higher, saner level of genuine writers, I think that some capitalize on "visual" horror more than others. I haven't read Clive Barker, but I've heard he's way more directly gruesome than King or Koontz. So yeah, it may be a thing.
Post edited August 19, 2018 by Telika