Posted September 17, 2017
nightcraw1er.488: Concept - against big companies and money grabbing ejits grabbing big lumps of cash for nothing, yes.
Siannah: Servers to host the data, a payment system, the whole infrastructure behind it.... not nothing sry. Yes the actual work on the mods (or paid mini-dlc, whatever) is done by modders, not Bethesda. But gamers denying a payment system = grabbing big lumps of content for nothing.
nightcraw1er.488: Of course they could have charged before, some mods even went commercial. There a no difference other than scale.
Siannah: Nope, they simply couldn't charge jack shit. Those mods that went commercial, the mod-teams gotten bought out / offered a job. nightcraw1er.488: Mod workshop got hammered by fans and Beths wasn't happy either, hence why they have gone their own route with paid mods.
Siannah: Valve was it who pulled the plug on paid mods, not Bethesda. Since Bethesda needed the server infrastructure for mods on console anyway (planned for F4), they went all the way. nightcraw1er.488: Skyui - you demonstrate exactly the point. Skyui has a ton of work put into it and improves skyrim no end. Some guy release a simple mesh with a texture, likely nicked off the net and changed a bit so it won't get recognised, and gets a ton of money - is exactly what is wrong with paid mods.
Siannah: And you missed the point. The same guys claiming mods should be free / a payment system being evil per se / still promoting or even claiming the donation system being the better option, failed to deliver on that. Again and again, since years.
When the mod seen as most essential (SkyUI) with just the donation option get's outperformed by a run-of-the-mill mod thanks to a payment system with a shitty cut for the modder, the gaming community should reflect on that.
Instead they offered the SkyUI team even thinking about offering the newest version for $1 death threats and blamed them to be greedy fucks.