Check this for CPUs:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=1781
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?id=2863

For GPUs, I’ve looked at their “single precision GFlops” numbers.

I have found this. Maybe it depends also on games... Maybe possible the 6300 is in some games faster (faster 8 core performance)
The 7500U has better Single + Dual Core performance
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-FX-6300-vs-Intel-Core-i7-7500U/1555vsm171274

Hmm?
https://devblogs.nvidia.com/vulkan-raytracing/

Yes, and they started developing REDengine 4 (used for Cyberpunk 2077) after The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt was released in May 2015. In March 2018 they opened the new studio in Wroclaw and so on. Much of the development (especially the development of the engine) was done before ray tracing for Vulkan was even announced. Okay, "the time of the announcement" was poor wording. I should have said "when they decided to use ray tracing".

So I have
Ryzen 2nd Gen 1600x 3.6 six core
Nvidia RTX 2060 Super
16 gigs of DDR RAM
How well do you guys think I can run the game at 1080P? I only have a 1080P monitor and am not worried about upgrading for at least another year.

These are mine PC specs:
1. Ryzen 5 2600X
2. Sapphire Pulse Rx Vega 56 8GB
3. Corsair Vengeance CL16 32GB 3200Mhz
4. MSI x470 Gaming Carbon Pro
5. Bitfenix Formula Gold 650W
6. SSD 512GB M2 NVMe adata SX8200pro.

By your opinion what should i consider changing?

Thanks in advance.

Both maybe ok for high or ultra settings at 1080p.
A small problem i can see with the 1600x and the slightly slower single core speed. But it depends on the game how well it is optimized.
For the Vega 56 i recommend manually tweaking (undervolting)

At last i also recommend the Msi Afterburner tool to show ingame cpu, gpu, .... usage to spot the slow part of the machine

https://de.msi.com/page/afterburner

Thanks a lot.

These are mine PC specs:

Ryzen 7 2700 stock
RTX 2080 windforce
Rog Strix B450-F
16 GB Ram ddr4 3200mhz HyperX Predator
SSD Crucial MX500 500GB
HD 2x2TB 7200 RPM.

Based on Witcher 3 I can play at 4K 40+ FPS with max settings. How much more demanding Cyberpunk will be I wonder.
Maybe 1440p@60 on somewhat max settings without ray tracing?

Turn off AA and you will get 60+ fps ... there is no need for AA when you use 4k resulution.
Hope you use 4k texture packs too :D but i bet then you will have 20 fps or even lower :/

The game is delayed mainly to optimize performance. Not for the PC...but for the console. The OP's system is far far far more powerful than any console.

All these posts about system requirements are amusing but seriously unless your gaming on an aging system with a Nvidea 760ti and 4 gigs of ram (Which is still more powerful than a console) you should be fine.

The system they used at E3 wasn't even that beefy and that was running a totally unoptimized version.

Ghost, your calculation does not work...
As example Shadow of the Tomb Raider. This game is available for X Box One, PS4 and PC. Try to play this on a PC with potato hardware similar to the console hardware. Underclock your PC cpu and gpu similar to the console hardware. Then try to play it on your PC.

I had huge problems with my old i5 4670k in this game.

Also, a PC user who play games like to achieve and hold minimum 60 fps. Even on console the game can not provide stable 60 fps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBwiWiCyV0s

Thanks for the response. I do not however see the point in using a bad port as an example. There is a difference between a console port to PC and a game developed on the PC ported to a console.

Secondly your comment on 60fps in regards to consoles is offbase as generally speaking consoles limit games at 30fps...generally because of the under powered hardware they use.

however I do get your point on an aging CPU. My old system that I just replaced...well over 6 years old and I upgraded it about as much as possible (an Nvidea 760 and an I5 2400) mainly could handle even a game like Warhammer 2 total war or a system hog like XCOM2-- but would regularly crash on Disco Elysium which visually didn't look all that demanding but the unoptimized Unity Engine underneath wanted more. My new system with a Nvidea card 3 generations never (1660ti) and a I59700 as well as a gig SDD drive plays it without a hitch.

But note there is a world of difference between the Unity Engine and CDred's engine. one's made and focused on one thing while unity is trying to be everything to everyone with plug and go development even a novice could pull off. The layers of code underlying that is enormous.

It's a safe bet therefore to assume if you can handle The witcher 3 your be okay here. It's not going to be that much more demanding. in fact the latest release stale is centered around making sure it is not.

Do you think a 1660 Super would be enough to run this game with decent visuals?