TheTWF: If you doubt the downward spiral of video game writing, look at the guy in this thread who thinks the existence of sexist characters, and characters acting in a way he deems Problematic, to be sexist and/or a result of sexism. Now imagine that these people are either in the position of video game writers, their bosses, or the writers/bosses are pandering to them out of delusion that this is actually progressive and improves the product or it's sales (SJ-pandering games tend to sell like shit fyi) or are terrified into doing so because they think they'll lose their careers and reputation and lives to baseless declarations of bigotry (the SJW weapon of choice, see the guy I mentioned).
It's FICTION. It doesn't matter what happens within it, because it's fake. It's not real people involved. And the idea that it encourages bigotry or wrongthink is so debunked that if every debunk was a brick then you could build a roman coliseum with them. It's is absolutely and utterly abhorrent that people are demanding creative mandates and censorship upon FICTION, the stories people want to tell that most often aren't allegories or political statements (I know that's hard to grasp for people who judge everyone and everything by race/sex/sex pref/etc, but give it a try). “This character acts in a way that I find offensive.” Yeah because there’s absolutely no one in the world who’d ever act like Jaheira or whatshername, and the idea that such a person could exist is just plain offensive. I know a robust Louisianan black women who talks and acts almost exactly like what you’re imagining right now. Should I walk up to her and tell her that her existence is Problematic? Or is that only okay when she’s a fictional character? Also, who the hell are you? Who elected you to be the morality preacher and policer of billions of people as well as what they consume? Sure as hell not the hundreds of millions to billions in the first world who largely get along fine and barely notice or care about things like race and gender and who you want to bang, and yet are the main targets of all these accusations of systematic/institutionalized bigotry and rape culture and whatever over the cultures that actually do these things.
And in the inclusion of all these pandering characters… I hate to break it to you, but gays and trans are a tiny percentage of the human population. Very much the exception. There aren’t a whole lot of gay people in the world and transsexuals, real transexuals not all these twenty year old brats who delude themselves into thinking they're trans because they so want to feel special (when I was growing up thinking they were gay and/or joining the furry fandom was what they did), are vastly dwarfed by THEIR numbers. And yet all of the sudden there’s these characters in every game, sometimes several. You can’t throw a brick without hitting one. Knowing why these characters are appearing makes it impossible to take seriously, and it breaks player immersion which is not good for an RPG. And none of these pandering characters are actually characters, or anything other than a platform to shove their existence down your throat. Alphys from Undertale for example isn’t defined by her being gay, that’s just a component of a character who is defined by the way she acts, what she does, what she’s done or hasn’t done, and her relationships with other characters. And by and large people were fine with her and other gay/bi characters in the game because they come off as plausible and three-dimensional CHARACTERS. The same cannot be said about the walking sockpuppets in this game, who exist to be gay and be trans and scold the player for not being a tool while being male.
Not even going to bother with the accusations against GamerGate. The idea that some people are still sticking to the unproven declarations of bigotry and harassment being committed by users of a consumer revolt hashtag, spoken by radical ideologues and professional victims who are proven guilty of every single thing they accuse GamerGate of, is laughable.
Step out of your safe space sometimes you uneducated and paranoid little brat, and take a look at the world around you. The real world, not the one Kotaku made up.
A perfect summary of the situation. I got tired of hearing the people screaming about how EVERYTHING must cater to the minority of gays / trans / mentally disabled / physically disabled / etc. If you want to address those issues in a game, make a game specifically about that or have it actually be RELEVANT to the plot. I've seen a YouTube clip of the trans character that they put in this expansion - it literally adds NOTHING to the plot at all and you're not even allowed to say anything about it in the dialogue options. It was put there simply so that the writers / devs could say "Look how trendy we are? We put a trans character into a D&D game!". I don't care about bi / gay characters in Mass Effect or Dragon Age because it's their own unique lore. I've read plenty of D&D books and played plenty of D&D PC games over the last 20 years - that's NOT something that is a normal part of the lore, hence it shouldn't be forced into it. If Beamdog had made their own unique RPG and put in gay / trans / multi-species characters, I wouldn't care in the slightest (as long as they didn't spew hatred for straight / sane / white / male people in their interviews). This has me not wanting to ever give another cent to Beamdog and there are plenty of others on various gaming forums who are finding out about this and deciding to vote with their wallet. They're a small company and can't afford for this to be a massive flop due to consumer backlash over them forcing their agenda into the game.