Keep it clean
If you believe that a wish duplicates another one or is not meant for the category, use Options button above to report a duplicate or spam.
Add your wish
If there is an item you wish to have on GOG.com and it’s not yet on the wishlist, please add your wish
Add an option to display all owned games on a single page in the user account
Added by
eiii If it's easier you alternatively also can make the number of games configurable, which are displayed per page, if this number can be set high enough so that all games fit onto one page.
jorlin Yes! and please make it easy to download this list as .csv spreadsheet
Differentiate This is the thing I want most out of everything GOG could do. Please fix this functionality of your website and Galaxy.
Staredown I agree. Even with the issues I had with the one page option, slow page load speeds and often it would cut off after an arbitrary number of shelves because my internet connection is made out of poo, I do miss it.
SpeedBo 127 game and they have to be split into two pages?
Not very convenient.
Please restore the single page system.
TheAlchemist69 sounds nice
Djaron Collection above 400 games (not counting in the unbundled stuff)... 6 pages of library !
Icons/game covers are displayed HUGE despite my full hd 30" computer screen... got 6 pages of library.
Only sorting order are descending purchase date and ascending alphabet title...
This is totally impracticable and unusable, especially when i try to search games in tne k to p, or 3 years ago, as i'm on gog since the beta start...
Library is such a painfull mess to use that i have 36 games update pending, and i tried to check what was updated after all, but it is so cryptic now (more than before)... Glad i maintained a full yet not-updated now archive of all my gog stuff on a 1 Tb NAS.
eiii And please GOG, make the game list on this page selectable again so that we can copy and paste it.
skeletonbow I'm going to have to call "nonsense" on people's game collections being too big to display in a single page instance. No other gaming platform has any problem displaying [b]thousands[/b] of games on a single page. I mean it's a reasonable hypothesis, but it just doesn't stand up to scrutiny. I've got well over 300 games on Steam for example and that loads instantly. I know people with thousands of games on Steam and they don't have lengthy delays waiting to see their game collection. With proper implementation on both the client and server side and optimization for how resources are used, cached etc. this is really a simple thing to do. Having a paginated view is totally ok too, and probably helps people with crappy Internet connections using 486s and whatnot, but many people don't have those limitations and never had any problems before with GOG displaying all games on one page, or with other gaming platforms doing the same. Count my vote for having the option to have all games on one page even if it is not the default option.
dal [quote]I suspect they implemented pages because people's collections are growing quite large, and accessing the shelf was getting to be very slow, using up a lot of bandwidth and thrashing GoG's servers.[/quote] Looks like it not thrashing Steam too much.
saluk I agree in principle, but I suspect they implemented pages because people's collections are growing quite large, and accessing the shelf was getting to be very slow, using up a lot of bandwidth and thrashing GoG's servers.
VanishedOne Being able to display the whole *catalogue* at once was also useful during big sales. Of course, infinite scrolling doesn't scale well as the catalogue grows, but right now displaying the full catalogue at once would take about 22 browser tabs. Bring able to have larger pages would be useful.
eiii If it's easier you alternatively also can make the number of games configurable, which are displayed per page, if this number can be set high enough so that all games fit onto one page.
PaladinWay Adding new functionality is great. Removing the option of old functionality is not great. Then it becomes a trade-off. This is why user-focused sites will do a public beta for interface changes to gauge feedback before forcing a change.
13 comments about this wish