Posted September 10, 2015
high rated
I am personally in favor of our curated approach. I think it adds a hidden, in a way, mark of quality to any game released here. I like to think of us as boutique rather than a bazaar.
Yes, we might miss some great games but, in the end, we are human and we do what we think is right by our community and that's why we personally review the games before they make it onto our store front. This system isn't perfect but which system is?
I think our curation allows us to give a game a lot more marketing and exposure to our audience rather than just dumping a slew of games of variable quality and saying "There's your weekly dump of games, now give us your money."
Also, having a non-curated secondary store front wouldn't exactly inspire confidence in both our clientele and any potential partners plus it would just look really tacky.
Disclaimer: the opinion offered here is my own and does not necessarily reflect that of GOG.com.
Yes, we might miss some great games but, in the end, we are human and we do what we think is right by our community and that's why we personally review the games before they make it onto our store front. This system isn't perfect but which system is?
I think our curation allows us to give a game a lot more marketing and exposure to our audience rather than just dumping a slew of games of variable quality and saying "There's your weekly dump of games, now give us your money."
Also, having a non-curated secondary store front wouldn't exactly inspire confidence in both our clientele and any potential partners plus it would just look really tacky.
Disclaimer: the opinion offered here is my own and does not necessarily reflect that of GOG.com.
