想了解《庄园领主》以及更多 Hooded Horse 策略类游戏信息与福利，QQ频道搜索:Hooded Horse 加入我们 或关注 bilibili 官方账号 @HoodedHorse。
《庄园领主》是一款策略游戏，让你体验中古时期领主的生活。使你的起始村庄成长为繁华的城市，管理资源和生产链，并通过征服来扩张你的土地。
《庄园领主》受十四世纪法兰克尼亚艺术及建筑启发，尽可能忠实呈现历史，以此为游戏机制和视觉效果的特色。为追求准确还原历史并使游戏世界给人真实、生动而可信的感觉，本游戏避免用到常见的中古时期修辞。
在《庄园领主》中，你可以享受无网格限制的城市建设体验，建筑的放置和朝向可以随心所欲调整。游戏的建筑机制模拟了中世纪真实城镇和村落的发展模式，主要贸易路线和地形会影响定居点如何建立和发展。
从靴子到大麦和毛皮，再到蜂蜜，《庄园领主》有庞大、多样化并且符合时代的货物。原料必须经过运送，通过生产链处理成为加工成品。你必须在人民的需要和生产奢侈品的欲望之间达到平衡，以确保人民满意度、生产足够的贸易货物以供外销，并保证武器和盔甲的铸造来为你的征战提供助力。
你的领地只不过是你的君主的广阔领土中的一小片土地，而你与敌方领主之间的竞争则必然会产生冲突。你将带领你的人民参与战斗，但他们并不是无足轻重的士兵，而是你亲爱的忠诚子民。你需要慎重考虑每一次可能会发生的牺牲。
本游戏最初仅有一名开发人员，在诸多玩家的帮助下，现已有完整的开发团队，汇聚了包括程序员、2D美术师和游戏及地图设计师等各类富有激情的人才。你可以与我们联系，分享你的见解、创意和批评建议。我们期待听到大家更多的反馈。
Game length provided by HowLongToBeat
Posted on: October 16, 2025
早期访问回顾
craftyorb
验证所有者游戏: 295 评论: 1
slow or no updates on GOG
it's not fair for paying customers to be a couple of release versions behind steam. Steam is at 0.8.035 while gog is stuck at 0.8.031 for a while now.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: July 4, 2024
早期访问回顾
Kingfisher2704
验证所有者游戏: 209 评论: 1
Not worth buying in current state...
I would not recommend buying this game in its current state. Many bugs, placeholders, not working perks, mechanics. It is beautiful, impresive in many ways and despite of those cons above it was fun to finish available scenario, but wait, because this beta is really in early phase. Also what is worth mentioning, if you want to be up to date with news, the beta branch is currently only available on other platform. I will come back, maybe in a year, try it again and then change my rating, but now it's a solid 3/5... Promising, but released much to early...
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: May 26, 2024
早期访问回顾
Wywerna
验证所有者游戏: 25 评论: 2
No updates?
Unfortunately game is rather not fun in this state and sure new updates are improving that, but released only on Steam for whatever reason. For the first time i regret buying a game on GoG (not the platform fault).
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: September 19, 2025
早期访问回顾
the_warhwak
验证所有者游戏: 151 评论: 2
Good foundation, barely any progress
The game has great potential for a "city" builder and it is very immersive. Unfortunately I cannot recommend it just yet, especially at the given price. While I had a lot fun playing what there is right now in the build, I honestly don't think it's a worthy investment, unless you have money to burn and I'll explain why. To start off, right now it's a bare bones experience, loaded with bugs, unfinished or missing mechanics. The tech tree isn't even half implemented and some of the perks you can get don't even work, but you will only realise it after wasting a point on them, leading to a botched playthrough. Workers can bug out, get stuck, or simply not prioritize the tasks you give them. On one instance several settlers got stuck inside the church after a bandit raid, with the only solution being to demolish their houses and rebuild them so new settlers can move in(which meant one third of my houses). Households will often have supply issues despite you having the market stocked with all necesarry goods, leading to drops in approval. The way bandit camps work on the map also feels unfinished. If a bandit camp spawns on the map, the only way top get rid of it, is to muster an army and march them to the camp and raid, it but the same bandits can randomply steal goods from your village simply by existing and you cannot stop or deter them, unless you destroy the camp. Makes zero sense. The worst part is that there have been no updates to the game in more than half a year. Despite the game selling like hotcakes, at full price when it was launched in EA, it really doesn't feel like the dev made good use of the money, since progress from then until now is almost nonexistent. Mechanics are still missing, bugs still present and a lot of people are starting to fear that it was a cash grab and it will never be finished, myself included. As it stands, overpriced, severely undercooked, potentially forever EA and not recommended. Buyer beware.
这对您有帮助吗？
Posted on: April 27, 2024
早期访问回顾
Eli0tsan
验证所有者游戏: 122 评论: 1
Super early development phase
This is like an alpha stage of the game, in my opinion you should avoid it. Most of the functions are not there, there are a lot of bugs, and if you really know these kind of games there is not really much to do after 3-4 hours you know it all and it's just repetitive. Many videos are misleading as they show functions that are not in the game ("locked in early access" is how this game should be named). There is no statistics so you really have to guess what is the state of your village. There are no priorities control apart of building priorities, so demands of highier level buildings are fulfilled first effectively locking you from upgrading. The worker placement is from the times of The Settlers, so they work when they want to work, and sometimes they just dont, i had several times when i had to demolish a building and build it again for it start to function because villagers assigned there were just in permament state of "waiting", and yes, the roads were connected. Bandit system is radiculously stupid, they will just randomly attack you stealing something, but you will not see their attack, you will just get the info you've been robbed until you dispose of the bandit camp, which are more abundant than resources on the map, like they come in dozens, so after a year you are left with a 1 source of each resource and 10 bandit camps :D And if we are at the resources, who thought that on a map with 8 regions, with HUGE forest, there will be two sources of berries ? When i go to forest i literally trip on them. ANY forest... And everybody here say that this game is so true to reality :D rotfl Yeah, like people in middleages for clothing just needed unsewed leather...or just linen cloth. I have no idea how this game can have so many positive opinions at this state. This probably be a cute little village builder like others in the future. But now ? It's alpha stage with no content. They did that in 7 years ? Ok, seems we need to wait another 7...
这对您有帮助吗？
出错，请尝试刷新页面。
没有与您的要求相匹配的评论
Error loading patrons. Please refresh the page and try again.
