It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Euripides66: Well that just goes to show that you did not understand a thing that I wrote. I was not providing "proof" of my own (I don't have to) I'm not the one presuming to know what happens outside what is actually shown in the game, I only stated what leaves better possibilities for the orphans Anna and the Baron. You can straw man this all you like, it most certainly won't help your situation. Moreover, I called into question the claims of olnorton, who could probably find "evidence" burnt into a grilled cheese sandwich, but not in the game itself. But you just keep on puffing your chest, and patting your own back.
avatar
Goodmongo: LMAO. Talk about logical fallacies! Proof has been given to support the stance that letting the tree spirit go is the worse choice. You however will either just attack the messenger, ignore it or say it's not valid. All the while you offer nothing to support your position.

Bottom line is the devs themselves can come out and refute you but you would simply ignore that and go about either launching personal attacks or denying the obvious. I guess facts and evidence will never change your opinion.
Conformation bias does not equal proof. I highly doubt that anyone will actually be taking into consideration what you so 'conveniently' call "proof".
avatar
Euripides66: Conformation bias does not equal proof. I highly doubt that anyone will actually be taking into consideration what you so 'conveniently' call "proof".
Yet once again you provide nothing besides veiled attacks against me. In order for it to be confirmation bias I must have ignored "evidence or facts" that support the alternative. So what did I ignore? Nothing. All outcomes and possible endings have been provided. This shows you are really reaching, or prove me wrong and tell all reads whay I ignored for confirmation bias.

BTW here is a definition in case you got it confused or something:
"Although not a formal logical fallacy, confirmation bias is simply the tendency for individuals to favor information or data that support their beliefs.

It is also the tendency for people to only seek out information that supports their a priori, or pre-existing, conclusions, and subsequently ignores evidence that might refute that pre-existing conclusion."