Posted December 07, 2009
For me, it's the actual complexity in the "metagame."
The sheer amount of decisions that need to be made, the uniqueness of any given turn, the situations that emerge as a result of all these individual mechanics -- these are the gameplay elements that make it such an entertaining and addictive experience.
The scale and micromanagement of HoMM (at least the older titles) is largely avoided these days as it's difficult to balance and represents an immense learning curve, but I think it can be well worth the price of entry.
I download HoMM II from GoG a while ago, and decided to write a brief overview of the game and expound a bit more on the above point in my blog. It's a topic that I could go on about for a long time, especially if I were to catalogue all of my experiences, but I figured it'd be interesting to ask everyone else for their opinions.
So, why do you guys (and gals) like these games so much? Any particular moments you recall fondly that -- for you -- capture the quintessence of the game?
The sheer amount of decisions that need to be made, the uniqueness of any given turn, the situations that emerge as a result of all these individual mechanics -- these are the gameplay elements that make it such an entertaining and addictive experience.
The scale and micromanagement of HoMM (at least the older titles) is largely avoided these days as it's difficult to balance and represents an immense learning curve, but I think it can be well worth the price of entry.
I download HoMM II from GoG a while ago, and decided to write a brief overview of the game and expound a bit more on the above point in my blog. It's a topic that I could go on about for a long time, especially if I were to catalogue all of my experiences, but I figured it'd be interesting to ask everyone else for their opinions.
So, why do you guys (and gals) like these games so much? Any particular moments you recall fondly that -- for you -- capture the quintessence of the game?