GlorFindel: We can argue which is worse; Galaxy 2.0 or new Steam UI, but want I meant was that people voiced their concerns about it; there was tens of thousands of posts about it and in the end, after few months, everything blew over. No one is talking about that anymore; not on the main forums anyway.
If it happens on GoG where G1.x is phased out and only support for GBeta, I for one, will not be posting about GoG's new Galaxy fubar ither.
I won't be seeing the shiny new games they have for sale since I won't be using the Client, however.
At that point, it would be beating a dead horse to complain. I'll let my lack of funding, such as it is, do my talk.
I own 450ish GoG games, so I'm not a lite user. That said, just think about the number of people that have posted negatively (or positively) on this forum. Now consider the number of people that use GoG.
You are seeing very, very few posts about it, good or bad, compared of the number of GoG users. I think GoG might see a slight difference in income from people like me, but I doubt that it would hardly be enough to even register for them.
From the way they pushed this Beta, to the lack of information, to the lack of making any meaningful changes since the Beta started months ago to address these issues, they have made it abundantly clear what they think about us.
They don't.
They care not one wit what we think or do. If everyone that posted stopped buying games from GoG, I doubt GoG would even notice.
So making a difference isn't going to happen, imo. I can only control me. And I'll try to secure the games I do own, regardless of what GoG decides to do, and never spend my money on them again. That's if they drop G1.x and GBeta doesn't have drastic changes (notably for me that would be: listing of games properly, links, and a way to remove/hide the social stuff that clutters the UI, at a minimum). Not to influence GoG, or get back at them, only because I spend my money where I wish.