post

*deep scratches in the wood do their best to cross off the previous day's tally, along with adding a new name*



HijacK - 3 votes (Krypsyn, RWarehall, mrkgnao )
Krypsyn - 1 vote (HijacK)
popperik - 1 vote (trentonlf)

FORMAT
Person with votes on them - number of votes (people who did the voting)

The majority to lynch is Five Votes



*trentonlf hears a knock on the door which strangely enough seems to emanate from about two-and-one-half feet from the ground. Terrified, he huddles in the corner of his hovel, arms wrapped tightly around his knees. When fear finally fades enough for him to move, he slowly unbolts the door... and sees the deep, heavy stamp marks of wooden shoes along with what can only be the drag of a burlap sack cutting a path in the dirt away from his home. It's a good thing he WAITED TEN MINUTES before opening the door... in the future, the elves will not give up so easily...*

Yes.

You are just what this town needed, a village lunat ... err non-standard thinker. Welcome! :P

---

HijacK, what is your read of popperik?

What I find strange is how popperik wrote in post 148:

"I'm actually halfways between Hijack and GreenDigitalWolf, slightly leaning towards Hijack, but not enough for me to vote. I guess I'll wait for both of them to explain themselves."

Both HijacK and me had already explained (though Hijack was still defending himself) before and after post 148, but popperik continued to post this in post 192:

After reading through all this stuff, there's one thing that stands out to me: GDW and Hijack. There are no other "suspects, they are all we talk about. Everybody is suspecting them. ..."

It looks as if he/she just repeated something to not appear quiet. Also, the second statement looks like it should go before the other one, where there was already a leaning.

Popperik also writes in post 192:
"Once again, don't expect someone to say a lot when he's asleep. So good morning everyone!"
As a villager popperik shouldn't worry about not being active during very little time.

Finally, I wrote how he/she repeated something, but it was not just copy and paste. Popperik added his thoughts about not thinking of HijacK and me as wolves, and saying that agreers are suspicious, eliminating himself as a wolf in his theory while contributing.

No vote yet.

I guess my post really backfired, didn't it?

1. "As a villager popperik shouldn't worry about not being active during very little time. "

My post was a response to post #181 from Sage:
" I am sorry but I am suspicious of popperik. The lack of posting and the posts that he does post make me question. "

A great deal of dicussions happen when it's night here, so I wanted to remind her that we my lack of posting during that time period was because I was asleep.

2. In my #192 I wrote that I believed GDW and Hijack to be villagers. What I wanted to point out is that if you two were villagers, that would be awfully convenient for the wolves. So if that theory is correct, then you two are villagers. Of course if that theory is wrong then one of you is a wolf.

3. Me saying that I'm not a wolf. Is it really something? Is there anyone who'd say otherwise?

4. As for you two explaining yourselves, yes you did explain yourselves before but it was not enough for me to decide.
I would vote now, but Krypsyn asked Hijack about me, so I guess I'll wait just a bit more.

Oh, jeez...

Just ... *face-palm*

I have a very strong opinion about your posts, and that just clenches it for me. I still want to hear what HijacK has to say, and hopefully Sage as well (she mentioned she would be back to post "later").

I give you the first point, I missed that.

I already understand your theory, but:

What I tried to say, is that I find it odd how you repeated the thing about HijacK and me in posts 148 and 192. As if you just did it to seem to contribute, and to not just repeat, you added your theory. Which conveniently puts you in a good posiion. You didn't say you were a wolf directly, you did it through the theory, which could be fine, but added to the other things I wrote I find it scummy.

Not only that, but I also found strange how in post 148 you wrote: -"I'm actually halfways between Hijack and GreenDigitalWolf, slightly leaning towards Hijack" and then in post 192: -"After reading through all this stuff, there's one thing that stands out to me: GDW and Hijack."

You were first leaning towards someone and then you seem to write as if it was the first time you noted it. Just reading both sentences taking into account the order and time between them, doesn't feel right. It looks as if a werewolf made a mistake in his words.

If you already knew we explained, why did you expect us to do it again? You said you would wait for us to explain, which we already had done.

Hello my fellow villagers. I am able to get on and read the post up to this point. However i have to cook the meal for tonight so we can all eat and I will be thinking about everything that has been said and I will stew over it while cooking stew and post my thoughts when dinner is served. (aka I have had a long day getting things done and dinner is my last thing to do I will be back on soon with my thoughts)

That was the first time I noted that we weren't talking about anybody else, just you two (apart from a few smaller posts).

The first explanations didn't convince me so I wanted to hear more so I'd have more info to go on.

I'd love to hear your opinion after it's over!

After what is "over"?

After this game is over.

Ah. You won't need to wait that long.

Again, I stated a possibility. Your ignorance to saying I posted a fact is saddening. Nonetheless, I am actually happy I get voted because in the end I will be right and you shall stand corrected.

Tough question. I have a detailed analysis about popperik's posts, but I'm kind of sick of people reading between my lines and interpreting only what's convenient for them, so I'm still debating whether to speak or not. It might be beneficial for me, or it might be not. I'll give this thought a few hours and then I shall decide.