Didn't want to crawl out of the woodwork for this, but I think I've regained my mental capacity to enough of a degree that I don't confuse myself with simple words.
I feel like I'm a broken record...not in the sense that I've repeated myself a few times, but in the sense that it's day 2, and I'm going to do the same damn thing I did at the end of Day 1. Vote Telika
I'm VERY concerned about his address to Flub's group. It's blatant fishing and it sorta got a shrug of the shoulders when he admitted to it.
So. I'm adressing to the 5 members of Flub's group. Do you not have the impression that scums are frolicking in your ranks, that hopping from pseudonym to pseudonym with no accountability and being protected from direct investigation is a perfect -and largely exploited- environment for scum ?
Or do you think there is any even remotely townie motivation for 18 pseudonyms ?
I for one would scumhunt in that era in priority, within it if I belonged to it, and any of my suspects turning out to belong to that group will get a suspicion bonus (heck, even the not-suspect-yet would appear on the radar). But my point is : I am surprised that nobody in your group pointed out this situation (and these behaviours) earlier, with his alarm bells fully ringing.
Basically yes. Though I think several can be identified already through statements and reactions. I was already, in day 1, suspicious of the 5-members group, and now I'm reaching the point where I think it's worth identifying them.
But even without that, I think they should scrutinize each others a lot. And I think that the townies amongst them not notifying us of such scummy behaviour within their ranks was already a mistake.
Left both quotes, but there is something I want to draw people's attention to. "I was already, in day 1, suspicious of the 5-members group". This stands out to me, since at this point it reads (to me, but that might be my mind still half groggy), that he knew that flub's group had 5 members already on day 1. Yeah, it's probably a bit of a stretch though, but I don't have that much to go on.
As we don't have access to the quicktopic where this is all happening, we have to delegate. To the members of Flub's species. More than to Flub himself, who is pretty much below the bottom of the list of people I'd trust for that.
There's something I find interesting about this quote. He's pushing Flub as what feels like he's obvious scum, but it takes a few days before he's willing to actually vote. He's repeatedly said that Flub can't be trusted, that we should hear from Flub's group, possibly someone who can't even be proven is IN the group since Flub said that there were a lot of alias' in use. But it took him so long to finalize his vote and put it where his mouth is, and even then only at the point where we absolutely need a lynch. In fact, the vote was only placed 18 hours before my post, around 2 days after that last quote!
So, yeah, that's my vote, there's my peace to the best of my ability. If people don't like it fine, but my vote is where I believe it needs to be.