01kipper: To clarify: "My race are unable to speak directly to one another
in racial chat".
.......................
flubbucket: This.
That does nothing to define the
number of folks that are anonymous. I was just wondering how you knew there is more than one anonymous person, since they are, you know, anonymous. :)
Oh, nevermind, you answered it two posts later with:
flubbucket: In our chat I've been talking openly and so others have used variants of my name ...in the beginning. Afterwards, a couple used real names to log thoughts but we were still restricted from speaking or addressing each other directly. With so many pseudonym floating around it's been hard to know how many are actually in our group.
No one can answer a question directly so surely you can see the conundrum.
I see. But, how do you know that one person isn't using several names to confuse matters? Or two people using the same name?
P1na: Anyway, my "chat" is a quicktopic (like the dead threads I've seen until now always were) and people found it funny to post under aliases. I have revealed my name in there, but others have not, therefore flub's point of "they know me but I don't know them" is not particularly strange.
Interesting... and annoying.
DarkoD13: Or are you talking about the "race/faction" wording? I had used the word "race" chat before, but given that flub was talking about a mason faction at some point, I used them both in order to be explicit and maybe communicate with flub.
Exactly how I interpreted it. However, Ixamyakxim seemed to interpret it such that you were confirming knowledge of two different chats. So, I figured I would just feed it back to you as an open ended question to get the clarification. Thanks.
