Aw but I like pontifications. Though yeah, gameplay-wise, they don't help much...
Anyway so there were are :
a) Either what is reproached to you are genuine actual involuntary scum tells,
b) Or you are victim of an "as we all know"/"and you know it perfectly well" kind of rhetorical trick. That is, skipping the "his posts are scummy, aren't they?" to go straightforward to "his posts are scummy, the only question I'll ever accept is are they on purpose or not". Politicians are very adept of that sort of skip-to-the-next-question trick, to deflect the questionning (and attention) from the premises.
I'd suspect, to some level, any of those who did use this manipulative and absurd notion of "he does it on purpose", and especially the first ones, at its function is precisely to impose a falsely already-established-consensus to the mind of the listener.
My vote stands for now, and also my potential vote against you (because you did act scummy to my eyes, and I remember your tear-jacking scandalized rants between your lynch and your mafia flip
, in the first game), but I intend to check the history of the "he does it on purpose" argument, later today.
If someone has more time in the meanwhile, he's welcome to.