Just when I think internet is back, it's gone again for a couple more days. But NOW it's back for good, and you'll have a votecount this evening!

Also, yes I will start posting votecounts at the deadlines, however all votes are reset each day.

So you can post in quickchat but you can't address each other?

The Arbiter stands and walks to the center of the room.

"Ladies and gentlemen: First, my sincere apologies for my nap. Sleep came over me suddenly and unexpectedly, and it shouldn't happen again. Secondly, here are your current votes:

nmillar has 2 votes (cast by flubbucket, Robbeasy)
Telika has 1 vote (cast by P1na)
flubbucket has 2 votes (cast by DarkoD13, amok)
SirPrimalForm has 1 vote (cast by Krypsyn)
CSPVG has 1 vote (cast by Telika)
P1na has 1 vote (cast by RWarehall)
DarkoD13 has 1 vote (cast by Ixamyakxim)
Ixamyakxim has 1 vote (cast by Red_Baron)"

With 17 alive it will take 9 to lynch. Day 2 will end on July 1st if no lynch is reached.

Woah, completely forgot to check in to this game with all the sales going on! Looks like I've got a bit of catching up to do ...

You are a turd.

Holy hell you live! I was expecting you to meet the Edit Elves any moment!

OK, then I understand nothing.

Can you give us a fictional exemple of a sentence that you'd be allowed to type in your group's forum, and an exemple of something you wouldn't be allowed to ?

I don't get the point of this restriction, and how it cannot be circumvented. For instance, I suppose that if I was a member of your species, I couldn't type the above in your private chat, but I could type "oh boy oh boy I so wish flub would give us a fictional exemple of a sentence that would be allowed in his group's forum, and an exemple of something that wouldn't". That would qualify ?

Or what tweak would be necessary ?

I'm guessing it's the spirit of the game not to try to "lawyer" or circumvent AFPs rule Telika. Could Flub "get around" his requirement based on some narrow interpretation of the game rules - maybe. But would it spoil the fun of the game and the framework that's been put forth? Yes.

So, you mean that my exemple is technically valid ?

I'm trying to clarify what sort of restriction we're talking about, in practice. What this restriction claim explains, or obfuscates.

Well, since you still haven't read the OP I'll qoute: "11. This is an interesting variation of mafia. At different times (specified in your PMs) you may speak amongst your separate races. Be forewarned, however, that there is no guarantee that your fellow race members are of like mind as you, so speak guardedly. "

So having made clear why Darko was talking about a racial/faction chat (given that we are split into races and those races form factions, and then we also have a likely cult faction or a scum faction, whatever it may be). That makes it a race chat and faction chat. Now having dealt with this problem of yours as to Darko having more knowledge than you? I guess we can return to the more important manner of your devotion to flubbucket and the fact that my votes stays on you ;-)

Also you should always assume some have knowledge that you do not and that there can be different intentions in not sharing. In this case Darko clearly just read the OP - thats how I see it. If he knows something more I haven't seen that from him yet - in fact the ones currently most engaged in given out information would be flubbucket.

Pre-post edit: Realized Krypsun and Darko also got around to explain the mysterious case of reading the OP and making interpretations :P Still like how lxamyakxim made no reaction to it.

Anyway glad to see nmillar return to life - now to see where it will lead.

Acceptable: I've been thinking about Telika quite a bit lately. I wonder if he's a Nancy boy or not. Perhaps the answer will come to me in a dream...

Unacceptable: flubbucket, do you think DarkoD13 wears his mother's underpants and bra and dances around for daddy??

This is most likely the case. One of the reasons I was eliciting feedback regarding infiltration early on in the game.

My lack of clarity regarding everyone having a Quick topic to discuss their feelings only exacerbated this silly roundabout regarding masons/neighbors/lovers/Best Friends/etc.....

If past experience is anything to go by, probably disappear again for days on end only to re-appear when the votes start piling up ... or maybe get into a mud-slinging match with someone who posted something slightly strange and go into full-on rage mode until that person is lynched?

So. I'm adressing to the 5 members of Flub's group. Do you not have the impression that scums are frolicking in your ranks, that hopping from pseudonym to pseudonym with no accountability and being protected from direct investigation is a perfect -and largely exploited- environment for scum ?

Or do you think there is any even remotely townie motivation for 18 pseudonyms ?

I for one would scumhunt in that era in priority, within it if I belonged to it, and any of my suspects turning out to belong to that group will get a suspicion bonus (heck, even the not-suspect-yet would appear on the radar). But my point is : I am surprised that nobody in your group pointed out this situation (and these behaviours) earlier, with his alarm bells fully ringing.