It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
"China" returned 21 posts
Clear search criteria
low rated
This post will probably be negatively rated to hell, but I want to lay it out there.

CDPR was silly to offer Devotion a spot in their storefront. This is a game that was highly controversial because of its inclusion of a stupid meme that offended a overly sensitive idiot that is the brutal dictator Xi. The developers of Devotion were stupid by hiding this meme that was going to be found sooner or later purposefully provoking the CCP and the hordes of online trolls the party has at its disposal and the outcome was going to be predictable - they were going to suffer the consequences. Their excuse that the meme was just an asset placeholder is embarrassing and it is clear that it was put there as a hidden easter egg.

China has an oppressive and dictatorial approach to freedom of speech, this is not going to be resolved by purposefully provoking it into a reaction especially when you are a small developer, this is done through social, economic and political pressure. It was a stupid move by the developers that will no doubt cost them their studio, it is a sad but totally avoidable situation - they got cocky and paid the price. The game was removed from steam and immediately became toxic waste that no one wanted anything with it, because sponsoring this game was going to be seen by China as an endorsement of this meme, given that the meme became more talked about than the actual game it was in.

CDPR thought it was going to be brave and empowering and it opened its doors to this toxic waste and the results were predictable by anyone with two braincells - the troll factory from the CCP disguised as GOG costumers inundated their inbox showing outrage or they received a serious call from one of their major investors and was told to cut it off or lose a large percentage of their investment money. Even coming anywhere near this game was always going to be a bad decision, and CDPR seems to be keen on making those recently. So obviously they backed off and people got pissed.

Now it's the pissed part for me that really grinds my gears - despite the fact that CDPR's leadership should look to have its leadership removed and replaced by someone that is actually competent or at least less subservient to investor pressure and whoever made this stupid decision should be fired, the fact people are upset at the actual removal of the game demonstrates the level of hypocrisy and immaturity from this community.

How many times have we heard that games and other media should not be politicized, how many games were review bombed on various platforms because they included overtly political messages that offended the large majority of this community, especially those around identity politics, sexuality, etc. I agree with this message 100% - video-games are not political outlets for your beliefs, regardless of what they are, they are means of entertainment. They should not bring us to a reflection of our world, but allow us to escape it, whatever message we obtain from that escape is our own to interpret. No game will ever bring down a political or ideological view, and the idea that it can is simply absurd. So why the outrage with this move from CDPR that removed a game that had an overtly political message just like the others you probably took the effort to sign in Metacritic to give a 0?

Well first its because it's popular now to shit on CDPR. They fucked up their Cyberpunk release and the game was miles away from what they promised, it was an interesting game certainly, even a quite fun at that, but it was not a mind blowing next-gen RPG that blew our minds - My brother and I played about 40 hours of it and have already moved on. Besides that it was horribly optimised, buggy and for some impossible to play on consoles. To add insult to injury it has been removed from the PlayStation store, review bombed on Metacritic and all of the youtubers that got free event passes to CDPR's events and free early access copies have turned on them because its what the audience is asking for and as the slime that they are even they started shitting on the company they couldn't simp enough for a few weeks ago. So it's funny and popular to shit on CDPR so the community petulant that they are are perfectly happy kicking another one for shit and giggles.

Secondly, the community is a toxic hypocritical mess - despite the fact that 90% of players (the term 'gamers' is pure cringe') are sane and normal individuals, its the small but vocal minority that call themselves the community that are pure petulant children that shout at a game when it becomes overtly political but only when the politics are against their views. These are the same individuals that will literally send death threats to CDPR's top brass when the game is delayed and send them messages saying they are going to chop off their heads, but then cry on Metacritic that the game doesn't run well on their toaster. These individuals have now taken interest in a small unknown developer in Taiwan that though they were going to change the world and free china from Mista Chi by provoking and insulting them, as if the result wasn't perfectly predictable. Didn't you popularise the term 'get woke, go broke' ? Where is that energy then, that developers who put their political views on games will eventually go broke - isn't that what's happening right now?

Then those slimeballs youtubers start asking you to support their company - bro, they had their licenses revoked, they are done, dusted and will probably never be able to work again in that industry due to the dystopian social score system they have, do you really think its going to be 15 dollars at their game that will save them? Your activism has as much worth as a Facebook like. They could leave their activism at the door, publish a game that by all account was quite good and then proceed to do their activism as a separate activity, it would probably cost them their lives, but that is the price to pay in current China, sadly. You cannot purposefully do something that is illegal in your country and then cry about having repercussions.

All of you that keep spamming these forums with this shit topic, shut up and go play a good old game
low rated
ah a chinese shill go live in china
high rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: These are the same individuals that will literally send death threats to CDPR's top brass when the game is delayed and send them messages saying they are going to chop off their heads
They really aren't. The death threats weren't even about politics, Devotion or China, they were a couple of dumb kids sulking because Cyberpunk was delayed (and that was back in October):-
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/cyberpunk-2077-dev-responds-to-death-threats-over-delay/1100-6483868/

Just close the thread already...
Post edited December 19, 2020 by AB2012
low rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: I understand what you are saying, I'm mostly blowing off some steam because it's just like what happned with Bethesda - the screw up big and every time they fart there are 15 articles and 300 youtube videos on why the bad Bethesda is bad Bethesda.
avatar
teceem: Just my opinion (my last sentence):
Have you considered other ways of "blowing off steam"? e.g.: friends/social media/blogging/hobbies/sports/etc. etc. how about playing a game?
Shouldn't forums/fora be mainly a communication medium?
I am communicating my frustrations. You are free to ignore this thread just as I was free to ignore this and move on.

Seems that we are all hipocritical in some way eh?
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: I don't think you read it properly - I'm referring to the people who will cry about a game becoming overly political and going to metacritic like an SJW creating a petition. These are sad people, if the shoe fits I'm sorry.
avatar
BrianSim: I'm reading just fine and quoted you "must be the same individuals that will literally send death threats" exactly letter for letter. You are so completely over the top "enraged" at something that you are literally pinning everything on "the community" and making a fool of yourself in the process out of misplaced over-compensated anger issues.

Name them. Who here on GOG has been "sending death threats"? Show me.

"If the shoe fits" = are you accusing me of sending death threats too? (something GOG can easily disprove)? Reported for trolling. Seriously dude, switch off the computer, go out and get some fresh air and calm down until you get a grip of yourself. This is embarrassing for everyone...
You are either purposefully misreading what I am writing or are just failing to understand. If the shoe fits was in relation to the review bombing and crying on metacritic. I don't know if you sent anything to GOG, and I don't care

You are free to do the same, if you don't like the thread, downvote and move on. Simple as that. But you are still engaging with it just as I am engaging with you.

avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: These are the same individuals that will literally send death threats to CDPR's top brass when the game is delayed and send them messages saying they are going to chop off their heads
avatar
AB2012: They really aren't. The death threats weren't even about politics, Devotion or China, they were a couple of dumb kids sulking because Cyberpunk was delayed (and that was back in October):-
https://www.gamespot.com/articles/cyberpunk-2077-dev-responds-to-death-threats-over-delay/1100-6483868/

Just close the thread already...
I literally say ' When the game is delayed'.
Post edited December 19, 2020 by Anakin-Skywalker
low rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: It's hilarious that the people criticising censorship are the ones calling for it, when the thing in question disagrees with their views
avatar
BrianSim: There have been some strong reactions to Devotion over the past day or so, but between this thread and the other one (which also needs closing too, not out of censorship but because it's full on trolling right from the very obvious highly antagonistic and provocative worded tone of the first post), right now some of the greatest toxicity of all on this site is actually coming from those claiming to be "anti-toxic" with posts along the lines of "I just KNOW what everyone is thinking because I'm psychic. NO-ONE anywhere here cared about the game before GOG removal. You're ALL doing it because you want to hate. Yes that's it. If two of you criticise Devotion's removal and express hate then ALL you who criticise Devotion's removal are haters too".

The anti-stereotyping stereotyping here is absolutely ridiculous to see, and literal trolling. Over & out...
My intention was not to come off as trolling, my intention was simply to point out something that I saw as hipocritical. There have been some clearly trolling responses like someone calling me a shitwit that I simply ignore, but I do try and respond to responses like yours that actually try to engage in a conversation.

I am a strong proponent for freedom of speech, something that doesn't really exist where I am from - the UK. Altough not as bad as China you can also get arrested for saying something wrong and some people have been, it's not a vail threat. But I am not going around saying things I know to be purposefully against those rules because I won't change anything, I will only get in trouble, there are other ways to resolve those issues like activism or writing to your MP or even suing the government but breaking those rules isn't the solution because it will only get you in trouble and remove attention from your point. The same thing applies here, if my thread or others get removed by GOG because it broke its rules, I'll move on with my life and that's that, but I think everyone has the right to write what they want even if its the guy calling me a shitwit because that's his opinion.
Post edited December 19, 2020 by Anakin-Skywalker
low rated
avatar
Tinqer: Opening a thread by lumping people who care about the political aspects of games with those who send death threats is a little volatile.

At some point all people die and all empires fall. I may be a silly progressive, but there's no financial bottom line more important to me than standing up to powerful bullies wherever possible.

Being afraid of "provoking them" or "breaking [their] rules" just gives them more power.
When you provoke someone you are expecting a reaction or at least know that a reaction is possible. They broke their rules and provoked them and the CCP reacted. How is that anyone's but the ones provoking responsability to deal with the consequences?

I think CDPR saw an opportunity to do something good but just like their regional pricing credit, the leadership sometimes forget that they have investors and investors want to make money more than anything. Usually when investors allow risk taking is with the expectation that a larger reward will be had - when the result is worse than the outcome they will abandon ship faster than the rats they mimic. So when CDPR said they would allow refunds up to 30 days the possible outcome was more people getting into their store which meant more revenue, but when they ann
ounced that they were going to go against China and lose its mamoth market there is really no ammount of support foer an unknown indie game that will make up for that loss so they were going to back off.

I just can't understand what is going on at the top in CDPR, are these people not able to think more than two steps ahead?
low rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: This post will probably be negatively rated to hell, but I want to lay it out there.

CDPR was silly to offer Devotion a spot in their storefront. This is a game that was highly controversial because of its inclusion of a stupid meme that offended a overly sensitive idiot that is the brutal dictator Xi. The developers of Devotion were stupid by hiding this meme that was going to be found sooner or later purposefully provoking the CCP and the hordes of online trolls the party has at its disposal and the outcome was going to be predictable - they were going to suffer the consequences. Their excuse that the meme was just an asset placeholder is embarrassing and it is clear that it was put there as a hidden easter egg.

China has an oppressive and dictatorial approach to freedom of speech, this is not going to be resolved by purposefully provoking it into a reaction especially when you are a small developer, this is done through social, economic and political pressure. It was a stupid move by the developers that will no doubt cost them their studio, it is a sad but totally avoidable situation - they got cocky and paid the price. The game was removed from steam and immediately became toxic waste that no one wanted anything with it, because sponsoring this game was going to be seen by China as an endorsement of this meme, given that the meme became more talked about than the actual game it was in.

CDPR thought it was going to be brave and empowering and it opened its doors to this toxic waste and the results were predictable by anyone with two braincells - the troll factory from the CCP disguised as GOG costumers inundated their inbox showing outrage or they received a serious call from one of their major investors and was told to cut it off or lose a large percentage of their investment money. Even coming anywhere near this game was always going to be a bad decision, and CDPR seems to be keen on making those recently. So obviously they backed off and people got pissed.

Now it's the pissed part for me that really grinds my gears - despite the fact that CDPR's leadership should look to have its leadership removed and replaced by someone that is actually competent or at least less subservient to investor pressure and whoever made this stupid decision should be fired, the fact people are upset at the actual removal of the game demonstrates the level of hypocrisy and immaturity from this community.

How many times have we heard that games and other media should not be politicized, how many games were review bombed on various platforms because they included overtly political messages that offended the large majority of this community, especially those around identity politics, sexuality, etc. I agree with this message 100% - video-games are not political outlets for your beliefs, regardless of what they are, they are means of entertainment. They should not bring us to a reflection of our world, but allow us to escape it, whatever message we obtain from that escape is our own to interpret. No game will ever bring down a political or ideological view, and the idea that it can is simply absurd. So why the outrage with this move from CDPR that removed a game that had an overtly political message just like the others you probably took the effort to sign in Metacritic to give a 0?

Well first its because it's popular now to shit on CDPR. They fucked up their Cyberpunk release and the game was miles away from what they promised, it was an interesting game certainly, even a quite fun at that, but it was not a mind blowing next-gen RPG that blew our minds - My brother and I played about 40 hours of it and have already moved on. Besides that it was horribly optimised, buggy and for some impossible to play on consoles. To add insult to injury it has been removed from the PlayStation store, review bombed on Metacritic and all of the youtubers that got free event passes to CDPR's events and free early access copies have turned on them because its what the audience is asking for and as the slime that they are even they started shitting on the company they couldn't simp enough for a few weeks ago. So it's funny and popular to shit on CDPR so the community petulant that they are are perfectly happy kicking another one for shit and giggles.

Secondly, the community is a toxic hypocritical mess - despite the fact that 90% of players (the term 'gamers' is pure cringe') are sane and normal individuals, its the small but vocal minority that call themselves the community that are pure petulant children that shout at a game when it becomes overtly political but only when the politics are against their views. These are the same individuals that will literally send death threats to CDPR's top brass when the game is delayed and send them messages saying they are going to chop off their heads, but then cry on Metacritic that the game doesn't run well on their toaster. These individuals have now taken interest in a small unknown developer in Taiwan that though they were going to change the world and free china from Mista Chi by provoking and insulting them, as if the result wasn't perfectly predictable. Didn't you popularise the term 'get woke, go broke' ? Where is that energy then, that developers who put their political views on games will eventually go broke - isn't that what's happening right now?

Then those slimeballs youtubers start asking you to support their company - bro, they had their licenses revoked, they are done, dusted and will probably never be able to work again in that industry due to the dystopian social score system they have, do you really think its going to be 15 dollars at their game that will save them? Your activism has as much worth as a Facebook like. They could leave their activism at the door, publish a game that by all account was quite good and then proceed to do their activism as a separate activity, it would probably cost them their lives, but that is the price to pay in current China, sadly. You cannot purposefully do something that is illegal in your country and then cry about having repercussions.

All of you that keep spamming these forums with this shit topic, shut up and go play a good old game
Fuck you and your mother who birthed you too, bitch.
low rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: When you provoke someone you are expecting a reaction or at least know that a reaction is possible. They broke their rules and provoked them and the CCP reacted. How is that anyone's but the ones provoking responsability to deal with the consequences?
avatar
MichaelD.965: Xi is a pathetic sissy-bitch who is literally "provoked" at the visage of a century-old teddy-bear; literally anything he doesn't like should be encouraged at every opportunity, especially Muslims getting to keep their dicks.
And that's your opinion, you should be able to keep it and spread it around as you wish - however, say that gog removes your comment because it violates their rules, so you keep breaking them and breaking them instead of writing to gog and trying to get other people to write to gog to change their policies, what do you think is going to be more useful? I don't think that China is in the right here, I'm simply saying that they have their rules and breaking them has a consequence, it's not gog's fault that they chose to broke it, its their fault they even touched it
high rated
avatar
MichaelD.965: Xi is a pathetic sissy-bitch who is literally "provoked" at the visage of a century-old teddy-bear; literally anything he doesn't like should be encouraged at every opportunity, especially Muslims getting to keep their dicks.
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: And that's your opinion, you should be able to keep it and spread it around as you wish - however, say that gog removes your comment because it violates their rules, so you keep breaking them and breaking them instead of writing to gog and trying to get other people to write to gog to change their policies, what do you think is going to be more useful? I don't think that China is in the right here, I'm simply saying that they have their rules and breaking them has a consequence, it's not gog's fault that they chose to broke it, its their fault they even touched it
This isn't about rules, it's about values and it's about trust. It's true that the other storefronts aren't carrying this game. GOG told Red Candle that they would and then immediately changed their minds once the news was out. And they had the absolute disrespect to claim this was at the behest of "the gamers". Really this was about one man's ego and his ability to control access to his nation's commerce. Just because I understand why they made this decision doesn't mean I have to ever respect or buy from them again as they're willing to stab developers in the back and say it's what their customers like me and you want. They want to blacklist on behalf of ccp that's on them.
low rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: And that's your opinion, you should be able to keep it and spread it around as you wish - however, say that gog removes your comment because it violates their rules, so you keep breaking them and breaking them instead of writing to gog and trying to get other people to write to gog to change their policies, what do you think is going to be more useful? I don't think that China is in the right here, I'm simply saying that they have their rules and breaking them has a consequence, it's not gog's fault that they chose to broke it, its their fault they even touched it
avatar
jonridley: This isn't about rules, it's about values and it's about trust. It's true that the other storefronts aren't carrying this game. GOG told Red Candle that they would and then immediately changed their minds once the news was out. And they had the absolute disrespect to claim this was at the behest of "the gamers". Really this was about one man's ego and his ability to control access to his nation's commerce. Just because I understand why they made this decision doesn't mean I have to ever respect or buy from them again as they're willing to stab developers in the back and say it's what their customers like me and you want. They want to blacklist on behalf of ccp that's on them.
But that's just it, we are talking about 2 different things. The values are wrong and I agree with you, I have even made it clear that I am 100% for free speech multiple times.

However we are not talking about the morality of this situation, but the facts. And the facts are that a meme in an obscure game from a Taiwanese developer whose main market is China would not change the world because they dared to call a dictator with a weird beef with a cartoon bear Winnie the Poo. They are still free to do it, but then they must expect the consequences of those actions and it isn't for GOG or Steam to bear that responsability.

Where I agree with you 100% is that CDPR's actions were just plain stupid and dishonest. If they were ready to take the heat and lose the chinese market then they should have gone all in, but they werent and the results were to be expected. This was a stupid decision by management, as its becoming quite standard apparently, not a morality issue because it was never a morality issue - GOG is a company and they keep their lights on withmoney, not good actions.

But they have made these stupid decisions before, with that regional pricing refund thing which barely anyone noticed or even discussed. It wasn't elevated to this degree of dishonesty or immorality like this is being portraied - it was a business decision, a stupid one, but not a moral one. No one cared because this is just what happens when you have stupid people in charge - but it has become a whole thing about morality because it is popular to shit on CDPR now so that's what people are going with.
Post edited December 19, 2020 by Anakin-Skywalker
low rated
avatar
Anakin-Skywalker: But they have made these stupid decisions before, with that regional pricing refund thing which barely anyone noticed or even discussed. It wasn't elevated to this degree of dishonesty or immorality like this is being portraied - it was a business decision, a stupid one, but not a moral one. No one cared because this is just what happens when you have stupid people in charge - but it has become a whole thing about morality because it is popular to shit on CDPR now so that's what people are going with.
avatar
jonridley: I'll bet they didn't blame their own customers in a tweet last time. That's what really sticks in my craw.
Yeah I didn't get that one, but I think it's easy to guess what happened.

China, as with Russia, have troll mills that basically go around the internet purposefully provoking and insulting people that even appear to disagree with China or the CCP to make it look like people actually care about either of those things to that degree. This was most likely the outrage that sparked the game to be banned from Steam in the first place as it was review bombed and soon after political pressure led steam to pull the plug on them.

I'm assuming the same happened here. troll mills go in, spam their inboxes with outraged emails and then political pressure swoops in with that 'legitimacy' and citing the outrage in China to ban this game with a veiled threat that unless they remove it China might have to reconsider their place in the country.

And that's how politics is made - its a reality that some people in this forum fail to understand. Money talks a lot louder than mean tweets for 3 days.
avatar
jonridley: I'll bet they didn't blame their own customers in a tweet last time. That's what really sticks in my craw.
avatar
BluesyMoo: I think GOG deciding to lie that it was "many gamers" was a moral and business decision. Actually, an immoral one.
See my answer to jonridley
Post edited December 19, 2020 by Anakin-Skywalker
high rated
Only two comments

GOG's owners really put their foot in it. Cyberpunks mess (does it sound reasonable companies should be testing their games as much as possible before release?. alpha/beta's?. how long had this game been in development? .I havent followed the development but really they should have kept the media hyper to a minimal and not place pressure on themselves to get something out the door which wasnt ready).

Devotion mess -- well the PR department really didnt use their brains and just dropped a goose eggs. The whole bending over for China business needs to stop - every company. yes China is big. Yes China unfortunately has a lot of money (well the elite 1% unfortunately) to blow. Way too much influence.. but companies and customer to a point only have themselves to blame. Which comes around to CDPR. Who are the actual investors people claim they need to keep happy?. Are they that important ???. So bloody what if some chinese bots....i mean gamers get upset?. Those toolbags in China threw out an upsetting tweet @ aussies (google it) recently and refused to take it down - does this mean its ok for them to be negative and not right for others to make fun of them?. oh man......
avatar
Niggles: Only two comments

GOG's owners really put their foot in it. Cyberpunks mess (does it sound reasonable companies should be testing their games as much as possible before release?. alpha/beta's?. how long had this game been in development? .I havent followed the development but really they should have kept the media hyper to a minimal and not place pressure on themselves to get something out the door which wasnt ready).

Devotion mess -- well the PR department really didnt use their brains and just dropped a goose eggs. The whole bending over for China business needs to stop - every company. yes China is big. Yes China unfortunately has a lot of money (well the elite 1% unfortunately) to blow. Way too much influence.. but companies and customer to a point only have themselves to blame. Which comes around to CDPR. Who are the actual investors people claim they need to keep happy?. Are they that important ???. So bloody what if some chinese bots....i mean gamers get upset?. Those toolbags in China threw out an upsetting tweet @ aussies (google it) recently and refused to take it down - does this mean its ok for them to be negative and not right for others to make fun of them?. oh man......
It's more of the fact that upsetting the wrong people can have massive consequences. If China's government wanted to, they could ban GOG entirely, damaging CDPR's customer base. CDPR have never done a game as ambitious as CP2077, apart from the Witcher 3, and both had issues at launch. People have got to realize that it's to be expected cause CDPR is just another company like Bioware or 2K and shouldn't be treated as the second coming of Christ, although CDPR have done a lot of good supporting their games well after release, but the matter with Devotion is that it upset people, and to avoid further trouble, they did what they thought was best and removed it so the Chinese government wouldn't lose their shit. I also believe CDPR's way of handling the situation and choice of words was very poor but it's better than starting an outrage with a whole nother country. At the end of the day, freedom of speech is great but if you purposely include something in your game to poke fun at someone who won't take kindly to it, well thats on you mate.
low rated
avatar
Niggles: Only two comments

GOG's owners really put their foot in it. Cyberpunks mess (does it sound reasonable companies should be testing their games as much as possible before release?. alpha/beta's?. how long had this game been in development? .I havent followed the development but really they should have kept the media hyper to a minimal and not place pressure on themselves to get something out the door which wasnt ready).

Devotion mess -- well the PR department really didnt use their brains and just dropped a goose eggs. The whole bending over for China business needs to stop - every company. yes China is big. Yes China unfortunately has a lot of money (well the elite 1% unfortunately) to blow. Way too much influence.. but companies and customer to a point only have themselves to blame. Which comes around to CDPR. Who are the actual investors people claim they need to keep happy?. Are they that important ???. So bloody what if some chinese bots....i mean gamers get upset?. Those toolbags in China threw out an upsetting tweet @ aussies (google it) recently and refused to take it down - does this mean its ok for them to be negative and not right for others to make fun of them?. oh man......
If you have to ask if the investors are important, you either don't understand a lot about business or are just too naive. CDPR is a publicly traded company in the polish stock market and has a multitude of stockholders and no doubt a slew of other private investors. Just to get an idea of how powerful these are, the stockholders own 66% of the company which means that they have the final say when it comes to major decisions and most likely can fire senior leadership through vote.

So say that you are one of these stockholders. You have about 3 million dollars in this company and have recently bought 5 million more dollars because this fancy game they were about to release was one of (if not the most) hyped game of all time. You are expecting the company to make big bucks and the stock to rise by a good ammount. But oh shit, the game comes out and its basically unplayable for its biggest market - consoles. And oh shit, it's actually not as good as people thought so it's getting review bombed. And oh shit, the stock is down 30% and I just lost 2.4 million dollars when you were expecting to make at least that in profit from your last minute investment... So you go along and obviously the market goes up and down and you sit down in an emergency meeting for all investors where the idiotic management for that game try to portray themselves as the victims and 'take responsibility' and you are told that they are working on it and things will get better. Okay, you are stil pissed at the money lost but you hold to your shares and wait for feb to come along. But oh shit again - the game was just removed from Playstation, which is just embarassing and makes you really concerned for the ability for the company to make as much money in the long term as they promised they would make, and then the refunds, refunding all ps purchases was not going to be cheap, how much would this cost? So because you are a greedy investor cunt you worry about losing your precious millions and all of the sudden you start hearing a buzz about an unknown obscure taiwanese game being published in their platform... and that it was a game that was banned from other storefronts for pissing off China... Now how would you feel, if you were that greedy investing cunt, if after all of this you were about to lose one of the biggest markets for video-games on earth because of some unknown game from an unknown publisher?

Imagine this multiplied by all of those that have their nose in the pie, and you can imagine the flurry of screaming phonecalls the idiots at CDPR's senior management team actually go? Now consider that many investors will no doubt be Chinese or with ties to China, and would have to stop working with gog if they pressed on with that decision. It was obvious what was going to happen and only the same idiots that released Cyberpunk now could have thought about it....

I actually think that whoever is making these decisions should just be fired and someone with an actual understanding of how business works should come along. Cyberpunk should have been delayed for about 1-2 years to a point where they can work like normal people and not be overworked and abused. And the idiots that continue to come up with ideas like regional pricing, gog connect, etc. should be fired so they stop trying to appease a need that isn't there,.

I'm second guessing but I've worked in the financial industry for a good ammount of years to know that this is basically how it works - something is about to lose money, investors scream at the people doing it, and hte action stops. Quite simple.
avatar
Niggles: Only two comments

GOG's owners really put their foot in it. Cyberpunks mess (does it sound reasonable companies should be testing their games as much as possible before release?. alpha/beta's?. how long had this game been in development? .I havent followed the development but really they should have kept the media hyper to a minimal and not place pressure on themselves to get something out the door which wasnt ready).

Devotion mess -- well the PR department really didnt use their brains and just dropped a goose eggs. The whole bending over for China business needs to stop - every company. yes China is big. Yes China unfortunately has a lot of money (well the elite 1% unfortunately) to blow. Way too much influence.. but companies and customer to a point only have themselves to blame. Which comes around to CDPR. Who are the actual investors people claim they need to keep happy?. Are they that important ???. So bloody what if some chinese bots....i mean gamers get upset?. Those toolbags in China threw out an upsetting tweet @ aussies (google it) recently and refused to take it down - does this mean its ok for them to be negative and not right for others to make fun of them?. oh man......
avatar
Kazuki_sensei: It's more of the fact that upsetting the wrong people can have massive consequences. If China's government wanted to, they could ban GOG entirely, damaging CDPR's customer base. CDPR have never done a game as ambitious as CP2077, apart from the Witcher 3, and both had issues at launch. People have got to realize that it's to be expected cause CDPR is just another company like Bioware or 2K and shouldn't be treated as the second coming of Christ, although CDPR have done a lot of good supporting their games well after release, but the matter with Devotion is that it upset people, and to avoid further trouble, they did what they thought was best and removed it so the Chinese government wouldn't lose their shit. I also believe CDPR's way of handling the situation and choice of words was very poor but it's better than starting an outrage with a whole nother country. At the end of the day, freedom of speech is great but if you purposely include something in your game to poke fun at someone who won't take kindly to it, well thats on you mate.
100%
Post edited December 19, 2020 by Anakin-Skywalker
low rated
avatar
Kazuki_sensei: ... to avoid further trouble...
avatar
BluesyMoo: There is no "avoid further trouble" with the communists. It's not like they show you their law and say, please don't violate these items again, then we'll be fine. Instead, they get their feelings hurt and demand your action to unhurt their feelings. Until the next time they want you to, say divulge all addresses of Uighur to unhurt their feelings.

As long as you self-identify as a CCP plaything, they will invent some further trouble that you must fix. The CCP's whole business with you is to invent further trouble when they want you to comply.
100% agree with you, but you don't fight a communist regime by putting a shitpost in a medium literally made for that country.

You fight tiranny through diplomacy and a heavy steel hand if needed. I can give you a concrete example of when this worked - China has had a massive issue with pollution and a lot of people are developing illnesses because of it. A lot of outrage due to lack of resolution on the issue started to rise up on social media and the CCP feared that people actually revolted so they actually started programmes and are looking more and more into renewable solutions to their energy needs. The fear of public outrage did that, not calling the guy a name.