_Slaugh_: Some games are allergic to
Intel graphics and only run properly with
nVidia or
AMD/ATI chipsets...
Sachys: same goes for radeon - ive found often when i research a game before buying that often the radeon chips are as problematic as intel if not worse. either way either chip should do the job requested
I don't know why you're saying that. I had many Radeon cards in the past (the latest one being a HD 5850), and I never had a single issue with a game (including
The Saboteur). The trouble with the Radeons (and it was the same for nVidia at a different time) was their earlier drivers, but the new ones are far better now.
The new Intel HD 4000 series is decent and more powerful than its predecessor, but for some recent games, you'll have to tweak the game settings to get an acceptable framerate. There are, unfortunately,
some older games that are hardcoded to verify if the computer is equipped with an ATI or nVidia card. For DOS-based games, this is not a problem, because DOSBox mostly relies on the CPU and has no trouble with Intel GPU's for the rendering.
As you said, if his intention is to play with
older games, any modern GPU is more than adequate.
There are two things I could suggest him:
1) He could take a look at the minimum/recommanded specifications of every games he's intending to play, and if Intel is clearly not supported, check the developers' websites for patches. Here's the official
<span class="bold">playable games list for Intel® HD Graphics 4200/4400</span>, compiled by Intel on January 6, 2015.
2) He could also check on
Youtube for gameplay videos of games running on Intel GPU's (for example, a search for
<i>"The Witcher 2" "HD 4000"</i> returned this
<span class="bold">gameplay video</span>. Here's the same game with a
<span class="bold">HD 3000</span>).