No they don't. NK is a puppet of China they do not do anything without thee Okay of China including threats to the USA and its allies. NK would not last 7 days in all out war with SK and the USA. China will not allow their puppet to be destroyed just like in 1950's when they came to their aid they will do so again. So whatever NK does China needs to pay as well.

Claiming they're a mere puppet of China is an exaggeration, in fact it seems Kim Jong-Un purged his uncle and others because they were seen as too close to China. China does have some economic leverage over NK, but they can't just order them around.
And you think war with China might be a good idea???? Well, good luck then!

A good Commie is a dead one!

Pass the drugs man I want to smoke that crap and hallucinate too

Sometimes I think there are more talks about Communism in USA than in anywhere else. ;D

There is it's called the Democrat party, and it was infiltrated back in the 1920's by the 1990 they became a communist party. Several Republican's are also Communist in ideal as well. Funny how Russia got out of that mess, and stupid people in the USA want to try it out.

break like the wind

Why, it's stayed quite civil so far, and nobody forces you to read it.
Communism means a planned economy, state ownership of the means of production, collectivized agriculture, a Marxist view of history. You can't really claim that Democrats and Republicans stand for any of this. Nobody of importance in today's USA proposes a hardcore alternative to capitalism. So the communist label is inappropriate.

=> A good democrat is a dead one. And a good "several republicans" too. :-/

“The Communist Manifesto,” published in 1848 by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is considered the pivotal moment in people starting to use the terms ... that transition, called socialism, the representatives of people should be in charge of the means of production, and guide the society toward communism.

Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels stated in the Communist Manifesto and later works that "the first step in the revolution by the working class, is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class, to win the battle for democracy" and universal suffrage, being "one of the first and most important tasks of the militant proletariat".

AKA Democrat Ideals AKA Communist Ideals.

The US Democrats are in favor of the dictatorship of the proletariat????
As a foreign observer, I was under the impression they're only a bit less plutocratic than the Republicans and stopped caring much about the working class a few decades ago...and anyway, even back during FDR's New Deal they weren't about socialism in the European sense, let alone communism.

When people do socialism, it's democratizing; when govt's do socialism, it has the opposite effect.

FDR and the New Dealers loved socialism -- *inverse* socialism -- meaning socialism for the privileged few.

You know, if you weren't pathologically compelled to post in every single thread despite having nothing to say, we could have just spam reported the necro post and sent this thread back to where it was.

nvm