GamezRanker: As I said before(here or elsewhere, I forget which): GOG can only delist on the terms of the IP holder....i.e. if an IP holder said "delist tomorrow and don't tell anyone in any form whatsoever beforehand", then GOG would have to do it.
(not trying to justify it, btw, just explaining one reason why they likely didn't do such things)
Sure I'm well aware of this common knowledge and understanding of your standard publisher/ip owner vs seller/provider/distributor relationship. I really am not the one who mixes developers, publishers, providers/middlemen and clients, with their respective obligations, responsibilities, rights, etc.
This case however doesn't seem to fit either of these two conditions: They aren't going to remove them right away but on 28th June, and we were told about it 2 days ago or so. Not the best example of imminent covert removal ever if you ask me, thus it could have easily made its way into the newsletter if there was will, with plenty of time left for gog-ers to do their thing. Maybe it just wasn't deemed important enough for all we know, though it's not all dark and grim - SmollestLight did their best on forums at least and we have the sale still going on.
Other outlets and social media picked this info up and the word is spreading, but it still begs the question as to why not use the power of an old fashioned e-mail/newsletter in such cases where it's not strictly hush-hush nor imminent (suckerpunch-style) delisting.