It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
darthspudius: I think this is the longest I have went in months without a down rep. I was totally being targeted for a while.
avatar
tinyE: I haven't been hit in 3 days.
Holy shit, must be an off week.
low rated
avatar
darthspudius: I think this is the longest I have went in months without a down rep. I was totally being targeted for a while.
avatar
tinyE: I haven't been hit in 3 days.
Oh you have.
avatar
legopig: post count
We don't have post counts. The number above the post is the number of posts in that particular thread, not the number of times that user has posted.
avatar
tinyE: I haven't been hit in 3 days.
avatar
legopig: Oh you have.
Okay well last week you told me to leave you alone, and except for just now when I made a harmless observation, I have. I'm not following you around, heckling you, or derepping you because YOU TOLD ME TO STOP and I did. In fact, I felt like shit when you pointed out what I was doing because yeah, I was being a jackass, and I'm man enough to admit it. If you don't want to pay me the same courtesy fine but you're on your own; I have to desire to get into a flame war with you.
Post edited June 11, 2015 by tinyE
low rated
A boneheaded phantom has entered the thread........and it has loads of accounts. More accounts than IQ points. No I'm not trying to provoke anyone.

See? The OP low rated. Its perfectly reasonable.
Post edited June 11, 2015 by Shadowstalker16
high rated
I'll be honest, I think this bitching about rep is getting more irritating than the rep abuse itself.
avatar
tinyE: I haven't been hit in 3 days.
Enjoy while it lasts, because until the ridiculous system remains it will continue to be abused. As with the rest of the forum still lacking basic features, GOG can't be bothered to expend their limited resources on such trivial matters. ;)
Bullshit.
Just give ignore option.
Well I gotta feed the donks. BBL. :D
avatar
tinyE: I haven't been hit in 3 days.
avatar
stg83: Enjoy while it lasts, because until the ridiculous system remains it will continue to be abused. As with the rest of the forum still lacking basic features, GOG can't be bothered to expend their limited resources on such trivial matters. ;)
I think the worst is Low Ratiing people on the gifting threads as an way to lower the chances of other people winning something while the abuser increases his chances.
avatar
Elmofongo: Did you post in the Gamergate thread?

It's a warzone that thread is.

I don't know who dereps me their. Pro or Anti?
That's why I stay the hell away from that place. For the sake of my blood pressure, if nothing else.
avatar
stg83: Enjoy while it lasts, because until the ridiculous system remains it will continue to be abused. As with the rest of the forum still lacking basic features, GOG can't be bothered to expend their limited resources on such trivial matters. ;)
avatar
Elmofongo: I think the worst is Low Ratiing people on the gifting threads as an way to lower the chances of other people winning something while the abuser increases his chances.
I don't clearly get how that works, though. Would the abuser be using alts to downrep targets? I was under the impression that you'd need to get a lot of "-" clicks to have a post marked as "Low Rated", so would you need a lot of alts to do it?
Post edited June 12, 2015 by rampancy
avatar
Elmofongo: Did you post in the Gamergate thread?

It's a warzone that thread is.

I don't know who dereps me their. Pro or Anti?
avatar
rampancy: That's why I stay the hell away from that place. For the sake of my blood pressure, if nothing else.
avatar
Elmofongo: I think the worst is Low Ratiing people on the gifting threads as an way to lower the chances of other people winning something while the abuser increases his chances.
avatar
rampancy: I don't clearly get how that works, though. Would the abuser be using alts to downrep targets? I was under the impression that you'd need to get a lot of "-" clicks to have a post marked as "Low Rated", so would you need a lot of alts to do it?
The most obvious low rated is if people posted more than one post especially if it's done in the same page or in one by one.

Thats a common rule of course to prevent greed.
The beautiful thing about the internet is that everyone is a nobody and all people can judge you on is the content you write. It's like a clean slate for everyone at every time. These reputation-systems are ruining it, eventually every system will be turned into some sort of popularity contest. You will have people trying to break the system to get the best rep, you will have people down-repping just because, you will have forum celebrities and you will have cliques. Basically the antithesis to what makes the internet great.

So in a nutshell, I wouldn't mind seeing the rep system gone.