First of all, zeo get well and eat a bit more if you need to;)
Now that we have a break, I'd like to give my thoughts on the "nomination" issue. I had a look at the old giveaway thread by moonshineshadow. At that time, it seems that there was an abundance of games and frequent nominations were fine in order to find good homes for the games before the list became too big. Now we have the Community Giveaway Zeogold Edition and, obviously, there are not so many games to gift, this month was an exception due to Christmas, etc. So restricting the amount of nominations per month is a good idea. The other part of the issue is the quality of nominations. We want fair nominations, not "blind nominations". By "blind nomination" I mean the nomination where one just finds the first person whose wishlist has the game that needs to be given away. There are people who have wishlists of 100+ games and people that have only a few. This means that the first category has a better chance to be nominated if the nomination is blind, and the result would end them getting many more games. For example, in this thread, BenKii, who has been doing a great job in the past, nominated 33 people. Out of these people, 1 was nominated 4 times, 3 were nominated 3 times and 7 were nominated 2 times. I don't know about you but I'd like games to be more evenly gifted and that would need more research. My point is that we are not in a rush to get rid of games, so let's take our time and put more thought into each nomination.