Go re-read it a second time if you still don't believe me.
Dude, I reread it about 20 times or more, Truthfully, before I sent it. I worked hard on that because I wanted to help him if he needed it. I was trying to be as polite as possible. Maybe you are reading what I said in a way that I didn't mean it, just like apparently I read what he said in a way he didn't mean it. It happens...But don't call me a jerk man, you have no right to do that, and I don't appreciate it. I really tried my best to do what I felt could maybe help him out...Not saying I was right or it is what he needed or wanted, but that was the goal of what I was writing, to help. I know you have a problem with people who talk about morality, every time this comes up I see you talking to people about this. I wasn't scared in my early life, forcefed beliefs and see those same people who say that being hypocrites. I really am too tired too, and I have no interest in discussing it with someone who calls me a rude jerk, when I really was trying very hard to help (I spent about an hour typying that). So, you seem to be cutting him slack for his words, yet mine are all wrong and by the way, this was in the first paragraph of my original post:
I don't know for sure if this is what you are doing (your details are sketchy)
Besides PM him? He decided to share that with the entire community here, some of which who are very young, I think that was a little rude of him to do and disrespectful to the younger ones on this site, or at least some of their parents.
I can't respond to this particular post because I didn't really understand the middle portion of it.
I'm going to assume you could loosely be called a Christian, because of other posts you've made. In Mathew, Mark, and Luke publicans (tax collectors, which were considered essentially evil as they worked for Rome) and sinners voluntarily come and sat down with Jesus and his disciples to have dinner. Do you think that's how Jesus presented his arguments to "call them to repentance"? Do you think they would have hung out with him or simply got up and walked off?
You accused, in the first couple sentences, someone of both lacking respect for others and abusing themselves. You then spend several paragraphs stating that they may very well have also abused others and why that would be wrong and close by saying, "my bad if I misunderstood" and "btw the way you can make your life better", thus implying it somehow is lacking (projecting your own world view on him). You also get in some jabs at how degraded most of humanity is (and of course anyone who sees Weclock's view of sex as "normal" is part of this degraded segment of humanity) and a few other details.
Now I get you have no problem with your beliefs and do not find them oppressive. That's great. If you cannot dissect why people find posts like yours unpleasant, though, I find that to be a shame.