Posted October 18, 2018
KUyTh: I think GOG should start considering the introduction of warning signs on store pages of games that are not up-to-date after a certain grace period. It's informational to potential buyers and might result in developers properly maintaining their games if they don't want to lose face. Waiving specific developer/publisher privileges, such as the ability to discount their games during sales, can also make them think twice about neglecting their GOG customers.
They should start by listing the version number on game page. (Allow for notes like "functionally identical with X" when a newer version was released specifically for integration with another platform, not affecting the game itself as it's available here, so there'd be no reason to update the version available here just to change the number to match.) Was referring to requiring Galaxy support. What if someone makes a game that would still work on XP and/or Vista and Galaxy integration breaks that compatibility, as I see reports it did for some existing games here? What about the Linux version, with no Linux Galaxy? Would all devs be required to set that aside when implementing the support, and then when making patches too?
Post edited October 18, 2018 by Cavalary