JuWalk: Well, there is "I want sex games and if you don't want them - you can just don't buy them" and "I don't want sex games so noone should have possibility to buy them". Isn't the second one more selfish?..
There are a lot of people who think that games with a lot of violence and blood are horrible, unacceptable, etc. So, now they need to be removed from GoG to specialized sites too? Of course no! I agree that each user should be able to block for himself what he personally does not like. But to demand that what you do not like is not available to everyone - this is absurd. Someone considers shooters unacceptably violent, someone says that simulators, search for objects and even many quests are not full-fledged games, etc. If you delete everything that seems unsuitable to one or another group of people, two and a half games will remain on GoG
HappyPunkPotato: Ah, that bit wasn't specifically directed at you. How selfish the second one is depends on who the games affect (and how badly) and who they're made by and for, in my opinion. My probelm is with the nasty comments directed towards the people who are upset by the games and the people who are unable or unwilling to take into consideration how someone else feels.
"I'm upset because someone doesn't want me to acces sex games even though there's absolutely masses of porn available" is, to me, a much less sympathetic stance than "I don't want these games to be available here because they make me feel so objectified / worthless / dehumanised". If the balance of society had been different between the sexes (in terms of opportunity / ownership / rape) perhaps I would feel differently (obviously is has been and is changing and I'm not suggesting liking these games makes you a bad person).
As an aside; I don't think Breja deserves any naked girls in his treehouse.
First of all, if a person is oppressed by a handful of pixels, he should seriously work on self-esteem, and not decide who should have access to what and who should not. Games and real life are two completely different things.
Everything is extremely simple. GoG is a store that sells games? Yes. Are these games? Yes. So they have the right to be sold here. Are those who don't like them forced to buy them? No. Just like no one is forced to buy shooters or walking simulators. So what's the problem? If you don't like some games, don't buy them, don't play them. Usually normal people do just that.
Think for yourself, what will happen if everyone starts demanding the removal of what they strongly dislike? One will say "Remove AO games, they offend me", another - "Remove shooters, they breed violence", the third - "Remove racing games. Due to traffic violations, a huge number of people die every year, and such games promote the violation of these rules", etc. And what, we will remove half of the games from the store? Or will we fulfill the requirements of only one group of people, spitting on others? Why? Why are conditional opponents of violence worse than opponents of sex?