If we'll just assume that there might be some truth in the OP, where's the proof? Tons of claims without anything backing it up. It's useless without proof, I'm willing to be proved wrong if presented with something useful.
Sure there are "some" truth in there... however, that's also the dangerous lure about pseuedo-science and other poppycocks; it's heavenly intertwined with half-truth almost all the way, making it hard for the science-illiterate to distinguish facts from bullshit... i.e. critical thinking is not part of their reality.
Same thing with half-life... I mean half-lies and other wonderful trippy disney-stories...