It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
There's the good old "Not a typewriter" error message :)

Also, HTTP 418 "I'm a teapot"
From RFC 2324:
Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error
code "418 I'm a teapot". The resulting entity body MAY be short and
stout.
10 Hi, I am dtgreene!

20 goto 10

:-)
low rated
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: There's the good old "Not a typewriter" error message :)

Also, HTTP 418 "I'm a teapot"
From RFC 2324:

Any attempt to brew coffee with a teapot should result in the error
code "418 I'm a teapot". The resulting entity body MAY be short and
stout.
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey:
https://www.google.com/teapot
Nice :)
I often work on Linux kernel modifications or drivers that manipulate various block I/O or file system layers transparently. As part of regression tests I run some routine file system diagnostics. When a bug creeps in, I usually end up with this in my logs:

WARNING: PROGRAMMING BUG IN E2FSCK!
OR SOME BONEHEAD (YOU) IS CHECKING A MOUNTED (LIVE) FILESYSTEM.
avatar
Barefoot_Monkey: There's the good old "Not a typewriter" error message :)

Also, HTTP 418 "I'm a teapot"
From RFC 2324:
...
Speaking of tea"I'm a teapot" means something very different in russian.

It literally means "I am a newbie"

The "Idiots guide" is actually officially named "Teapot guide" in russian. :P
So, perhaps the Error 418 actually means - "I am too stupid for this", as server response ofc.

PS.
Happy birthday!!
Post edited March 10, 2017 by Lin545
avatar
Lin545: So, perhaps the Error 418 actually means - "I am too stupid for this", as server response ofc.
I doubt it. The official documentation says that 418 is the error code you get when you try to brew coffee with a teapot. Seriously.
avatar
JMich: I doubt it. The official documentation says that 418 is the error code you get when you try to brew coffee with a teapot. Seriously.
I am not excluding this, but if you reread the RFC keeping the other interpretation of "coffee pot" in mind, it reads as "HTICP" :D

There is even a wikipedia article! :O
avatar
Lin545: the other interpretation of "coffee pot" in mind
What is the other interpretation of coffee pot? I thought teapot was meant as a newbie.

avatar
Lin545: it reads as "HTICP" :D
Still don't follow, unless I stands for Idiot, in which case the coffee pot means the same as the teapot, which would mean I'm even more confused...
avatar
JMich: What is the other interpretation of coffee pot? I thought teapot was meant as a newbie.
....
Still don't follow, unless I stands for Idiot, in which case the coffee pot means the same as the teapot, which would mean I'm even more confused...
Its more a combination of, like "dummy" as an adjective.

But if you like confusions, there is a third meaning - "head". For example the phrase "head hurts" can be said as "(my) teapot hurts" (чайник болит) :)
avatar
skeletonbow: There are literally hundreds of forum threads that are not "on topic" on a multitude of other topics. (whatever "on topic" is supposed to mean, and who gets to decide that anyway?)

People who aren't interested in a particular forum topic should just silently skip over it, because popping in and telling someone to not post is not going to generate good positive results for any thread. If a topic is in violation of forum rules then it should arguably be reported to GOG's community manager, but if not then one should just skip over it peacefully and move on with their day really.
That's not what he said though. Since sis creates lot of threads about programming he said it would be better if they're all under one title like a general thread for programming itself. A reasonable suggestion IMO and something that we already do here to an extent with regard to topics like humble bundle deals, free games on other sites threads, etc.
avatar
skeletonbow: There are literally hundreds of forum threads that are not "on topic" on a multitude of other topics. (whatever "on topic" is supposed to mean, and who gets to decide that anyway?)

People who aren't interested in a particular forum topic should just silently skip over it, because popping in and telling someone to not post is not going to generate good positive results for any thread. If a topic is in violation of forum rules then it should arguably be reported to GOG's community manager, but if not then one should just skip over it peacefully and move on with their day really.
avatar
Hunter65536: That's not what he said though. Since sis creates lot of threads about programming he said it would be better if they're all under one title like a general thread for programming itself. A reasonable suggestion IMO and something that we already do here to an extent with regard to topics like humble bundle deals, free games on other sites threads, etc.
Maybe I've missed something but the number of threads in the forums that I've seen that cover the topic of computer programming is so negligible as to be practically non-existent. If one were to categorieze every thread into an appropriate topic label, there are probably 50 topics that would be more commonly discussed on the forums, and yet the forum is divided into a single general forum.

I rather doubt that GOG plans to divide the general forum into multiple sub-forums now or any time in the next several years if ever, even if the general thread becomes a go-to place that puts stackexchange out of business.

But I could be wrong. Call it my gut feeling.
avatar
skeletonbow: ----8<----
I rather doubt that GOG plans to divide the general forum into multiple sub-forums now or any time in the next several years if ever, even if the general thread becomes a go-to place that puts stackexchange out of business.

But I could be wrong. Call it my gut feeling.
I think you're right. That was kind of addressed recently in response to one of the recent requests for an off-topic forum:
That said, please give us an off-topic subforum, sooner rather than later […]
Well, the general discussion is THE off-topic subforum, so do with it what you wish (as long as it's within the forum rules:)).
Post edited March 10, 2017 by thomq
avatar
thomq: I think you're right. That was kind of addressed recently in response to one of the recent requests for an off-topic forum:
fables22 has posted the new forum rules to the forum, which among other things tell people to not try to police or moderate the forums, to let GOG do that. It's my understanding that if something is considered off-topic here on the GOG forums that fables22 or some other GOG employee will directly contact the person and politely request they not post such things, but if GOG hasn't told someone their post is off-topic or doesn't belong on GOG, then it isn't really.

There's all kinds of stuff on the GOG forums that people post that I'm not fond of every single day, and a lot of it could be categorized as "off-topic", but that's up to GOG to decide, not me. I simply scroll past it and don't bother reading it usually, which is what people should do if they don't like programming questions or other things that aren't their cup of tea.

Somewhere like stackexchange or similar might be a better place to ask such questions, but barring it violating a GOG forum rule I'm afraid I can't see a problem with it even if it were on a topic I don't personally care for. Sometimes its best to tolerate others and selectively choose what we read/engage in, than to try to police them and tell them what they should do - without any authority.