It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Lifthrasil: 9 players, which we have now, it the reasonable minimum with which the game can work like I envision it. But I would like to have a few players more. What do you all think, how long should we wait for additional players?
I'd wait a few more days, and see if anyone else enters/signs up. I mean, it's not like most of us are going anywhere. ;)
I'm not sure how long we might have to wait for Joe, maybe even another week?

Also who the fuck low-rated the OP!?
avatar
SirPrimalform: I'm not sure how long we might have to wait for Joe, maybe even another week?

Also who the fuck low-rated the OP!?
The same blind/ignorant "anything 'political' must be kept off gog...raggghagh" crowd, most likely. They are like drones on autopilot, downrating to prove some obscure point and act like some sort of self appointed forum police.
avatar
GameRager: The same blind/ignorant "anything 'political' must be kept off gog...raggghagh" crowd, most likely. They are like drones on autopilot, downrating to prove some obscure point and act like some sort of self appointed forum police.
Thing is, we do have a rule against actual political discussion threads so I'm not surprised when people do it to threads that break that rule. Given that this isn't actually a discussion I'd expect people to lighten up a bit.
avatar
GameRager: The same blind/ignorant "anything 'political' must be kept off gog...raggghagh" crowd, most likely. They are like drones on autopilot, downrating to prove some obscure point and act like some sort of self appointed forum police.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Thing is, we do have a rule against actual political discussion threads so I'm not surprised when people do it to threads that break that rule. Given that this isn't actually a discussion I'd expect people to lighten up a bit.
Some here take almost ANYTHING that's a hot topic to be political, and some even dislike mentions of such topics in jest like for this game of mafia.....i.e. sticks in the mud/no fun allowed types.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Thing is, we do have a rule against actual political discussion threads so I'm not surprised when people do it to threads that break that rule. Given that this isn't actually a discussion I'd expect people to lighten up a bit.
avatar
GameRager: Some here take almost ANYTHING that's a hot topic to be political, and some even dislike mentions of such topics in jest like for this game of mafia.....i.e. sticks in the mud/no fun allowed types.
And too timid to write something about what disturbs them. Probably because they know that they would sound ridiculous. Instead they just press that down button and feel great about themselves for having "expressed" their (self-)righteous indignation.

Or maybe it's just one of our script-kiddie downrate trolls. Who use a ton of alts and a downrate script. Probably too feel powerful for once in their life, because they managed to change a meaningless number.

Well, let them have their fun. It's not as if they do any damage.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Also who the fuck low-rated the OP!?
Why do you sound so surprised? I don't think Lift has pissed off a general faction of the forum, so it probably isn't that. However, he (and anyone who spent half a second thinking ahead) knew before creating the thread that a low rating was possible, even likely, based solely on the concept.

avatar
Lifthrasil: And too timid to write something about what disturbs them.
It is likely "downvotes without bothering to read the content".

Some downvotes are lacking explanation because the downvoter is well aware that the other person/side simply won't listen, and the downvoter isn't interested in wasting time arguing with a wall. An abusive wall, in some cases. I know I don't usually bother explaning my downvotes for precisely this reason.
avatar
nmillar: Do we still have our own entry in the rules list?
avatar
SirPrimalform: We do. In fact it was when I proposed it be renamed in honour of your missing self that you turned back up! I think perhaps I summoned you in a Bloody Mary/Beetlejuice/Candyman kind of situation.
You have to be careful with that; one slip of the tongue and you've got the capital of the Philippines to deal with.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: However, he knew before creating the thread that a low rating was possible, even likely, based solely on the concept.
Yes, of course I knew that it was going to be downrated. This is the internet, after all, and that is full of POOP. (Perpetually Offended Outrage People). The title if the game was going to trigger both right-wing snowflakes, who don't like the NRA being made fun of, and left- wing ones, who don't like pacifists being the bad guys. Or something.

But at least the title generated some attention. Unfortunately it didn't attract new players yet. :-(



avatar
Bookwyrm627: I know I don't usually bother explaning my downvotes for precisely this reason.
But why do you even bother downvoting then? That's something I really don't understand. Everyone in the forum knows, that the rating of a post and the rep of a poster don't mean anything. So what do you hope to achieve by downvoting a post without commenting what's wrong with it?

I'm not trying to be contrary here. I just want to understand the appeal if clicking that button anonymously.
Post edited August 22, 2019 by Lifthrasil
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I know I don't usually bother explaning my downvotes for precisely this reason.
avatar
Lifthrasil: But why do you even bother downvoting then? That's something I really don't understand. Everyone in the forum knows, that the rating of a post and the rep of a poster don't mean anything. So what do you hope to achieve by downvoting a post without commenting what's wrong with it?

I'm not trying to be contrary here. I just want to understand the appeal if clicking that button anonymously.
I know it doesn't really inhibit them in any way, but there is still a touch of personal satisfaction in downvoting posts that are stupid and/or jerkish. As a bonus, it hides them so I have less scrolling to do in the thread if I come back later (or if the post starts off stupid, then I can skip to the next post without further scrolling).

Another bonus is that downvotes also track which idiocy I've already seen in a given thread. With the way some people post, they almost act as bookmarks!
Post edited August 22, 2019 by Bookwyrm627
I see. When you express it that way, it actually makes sense.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Why do you sound so surprised? I don't think Lift has pissed off a general faction of the forum, so it probably isn't that. However, he (and anyone who spent half a second thinking ahead) knew before creating the thread that a low rating was possible, even likely, based solely on the concept.
It wasn't surprise, more a "come on now, own up if it was you" accusatory statement.
avatar
nmillar: You have to be careful with that; one slip of the tongue and you've got the capital of the Philippines to deal with.
Indeed, or a shitload of envelopes.
Post edited August 22, 2019 by SirPrimalform
I was just going to observe, but after seeing the theming, I'm in.

'MERICA! THESE COMMUNIST YUPPIES WILL NEVER TAKE MY GUNS!

or maybe peace and love, man.
Also, seems a shame not to have some kind of Paranoid Gun owner role, but I guess those do not work in open setups.
And for bonus points, my name is Alexander Jones. You can call me Lex.