rodrolliv: The way I see it, the bosses at GOG don't care enough about the community to appoint any managers. It's only when a problem affects bussiness that they take some action, "getting feedback" and developing a few fixes. But that's that when it comes to the many problems around here, we are basically on our own.
I think it's tied into the back-and-forth that goes around whenever anyone even mentions the suggestion of community moderation, which is really what being an appointed manager would entail. People will be screaming bloody murder claiming GOG is promoting censorship. Others will swear up and down that they're a special snowflake being targeted by the managers, while others will be encouraged to further point fingers at people they don't like.
Laissez-Faire community management has been something GOG's taken pride in as a feature of their community, and it's mighty convenient that it allows them an excuse for not dealing with a lot of the messy aspects of managing a large community. I don't see that attitude changing anytime soon.