It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Lifthrasil: Is Microfish actually a double-voter? Or was that an error? ;-)
avatar
GymHenson: Pinging to ask what you think re: Nmillar seeming to just repeat part of what you said in post 408 in their post 410(I illustrate what I mean in post 412, first bit).
You're conveniently ignoring that I raised it first in post 402.
avatar
nmillar: I'm un-moved on GymHenson so far.

Leaning Town: Lifthrasil, blotunga
Leansing Scum: GymHenson, Bookwyrm, Microfish_1
Unmoved, yet i'm in the lean scum pile.....so which is it? :\

avatar
nmillar: You're conveniently ignoring that I raised it first in post 402.
Oh crap...you're right...missed that(or skimmed/read it and forgot about it).

+++

To everyone: disregard my suspicion of Nmillar for "copying" lift several posts back.
Lifthrasil picked up on ZFR's odd turn of phrase.

avatar
ZFR: I think when Town are moronic enough to end the Day on a No-Lynch when they shouldn't, then they deserve all the bad consequences. But it does happen here often enough on GOG, so let's keep that free NL as a safety net.
avatar
Lifthrasil: Hmm. If I would want to get nit-picky, I could make a case out of you saying 'they deserve all the bad consequences' and not 'we deserve all the bad consequences'. Don't you include yourself in 'Town'? ;-)
More town points for Lift.

GymHenson chimes in with his view of day chat, and it doesn't correlate with what others have said.

avatar
GymHenson: I was saying that day chat would benefit the better mafia players....if I were scum it wouldn't be much help.....as I am a perpetual greenhorn player and all. Also when scum and we have day chat I sometimes either forget to use it or am not online at the same time as my scum mate, making it even less useful.
Good catch by GymHenson on Lifthrasil's unvote of ZFR (I'd also missed Pookina's unvote).

avatar
GymHenson: If I may ask....why did you remove your vote on ZFR earlier(post 39) when Pookina had removed their vote 2 hours before that(post 35)? Didn't you see it?
Interesting question from Microfish_1. Has Bookwyrm627 been as aggressive this game?

avatar
Microfish_1: to those who know: the last time i saw bookwyrm play he was very...aggressive as town. is he as aggressive as scum?
blotunga defends ZFR's unvote.

avatar
Microfish_1: to those who know: the last time i saw bookwyrm play he was very...aggressive as town. is he as aggressive as scum?
And in the same post some useful thoughts about NL.

avatar
blotunga: About the no lynch discussion - meh, not really something we should strive for. Scum probably would happily agree to no lynch, free NK without any info for town from the wagons.
Might have to go back through everything again later and see who was for / against NL on D1.

Bookwyrm627 joins myself and GymHenson in the "not forming my own opinions" club.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: And it looks like Lift is going to say everything I want to say this game. Maybe I should ask him to ghost write for me.
ZFR outlines his reasons for suspecting GymHenson.

avatar
ZFR: He's played 13 consecutive games before this one, he knows what RVS is, yet instead of taking Bookwyrm's post for the RVS that it is, he's "analysing" if it's Town Bookwyrm catching scum or Scum Bookwyrm shading.
ZFR follows up with his bragging rights post.

avatar
ZFR: Bragging rights: GH + blotunga.

braggingrightsforeasysearch
Then changes his mind in the next post.

avatar
ZFR: Bookwyrm, it's you and GH, isn't it?
And that's page 2 done.

So, despite GymHenson noticing that Lifthrasil unvoted ZFR after Pookina had already done so (town points to Pookina for that action), he still gains more scum points for having the opposite opinion to everyone else that's weighed in regarding day chat.

Bookwyrm627 gains scum points for possibly not being as aggressive as he normally would be if playing town (will need to verify this), and choosing to go along with whatever Lifthrasil says rather than forming his own opinions.

So, nothing has changed in regards to town / scum leans.

Leaning Town: Lifthrasil, blotunga
Leaning Scum: GymHenson, Bookwyrm627, Microfish_1

avatar
GymHenson: Unmoved, yet i'm in the lean scum pile.....so which is it? :\
I already had you as leaning scum, and that opinion hasn't changed, hence "unmoved".
Not sure if I'm letting myself being buddied up, but nmillar is finally making some sense here in his past couple of posts.

vote GymHenson

That's a second L-2 if I'm not mistaken.
avatar
nmillar: So, despite GymHenson noticing that Lifthrasil unvoted ZFR after Pookina had already done so (town points to Pookina for that action), he still gains more scum points for having the opposite opinion to everyone else that's weighed in regarding day chat.
I mean, to be fair, what GH said about:

avatar
GymHenson: I was saying that day chat would benefit the better mafia players....if I were scum it wouldn't be much help.....as I am a perpetual greenhorn player and all. Also when scum and we have day chat I sometimes either forget to use it or am not online at the same time as my scum mate, making it even less useful.
Is not something he made up on a whim: that's really HIS prior experience with daychat. If you refer to the Shining game, where he and I were the mafiosi, there were times when I needed his input on a matter but I simply couldn't find him online. AFAIK there were even times he was posting in the thread while I was like "oh gemrunner where are you?". So I don't think his opinion about daychat is anything more than NAI.

Hey, do you know what's even better about GH's daychat opinion? It's based off his experience using daychat...ON DISCORD. He didn't have a quicktopic, he had real-time scumchat, and yet couldn't use it to its fullest extent.

"Here's Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooohnny!!" -Jack Torrance, The Shining, 1980
VOTE COUNT

GymHenson 3 - Pookina (#332), nmillar (#372), blotunga (#424)
Lifthrasil 1 - Microfish_1 (#353)
nmillar 3 - Lifthrasil (#378), Bookwyrm627 (#389), GymHenson (#400)
trentonlf 1 - Microfish_1 (#364)

Not voting: Catte

With 9 players it takes 5 votes to achieve a lynch.

GymHenson and nmillar are closest to lynch at L-2.

D2 ends in just under 1.5 days.
ZFR reveals his theory.

avatar
ZFR: Here is my theory:
After a long break GH drew scum and Bookwyrm is his partner. So GH makes the decision that he should distance himself. Only, like his bReadcrUmbing, he does it in a bit of a hamfisted way right off the bat. Bookwyrm has to reply in kind.

A couple of other things that smelled about Bookwyrm:

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Yo Lift, if you're scum, could you do me a favor and just kill me tonight? This makes me sad.
avatar
ZFR: A bit LAMISTY...
(the second one has an AtE that I don't like: people saying 'if that's how we're playing then just lynch me' makes me feel very guilty that I'm detrimental to their enjoyment of the game.)

But these are just very minor things, and in themselves would probably not mean much.

Anyway, there is my hypothesis: GH and Bookwyrm are the Mafia team and you heard it here first. 83 hrs after game started.
And follows it up a few posts later.

avatar
ZFR: That's not what you did here. You didn't "catch" BW on a slip or confession. You accused his RVS of being a shade attempt.

Also, you haven't done such firstpost hunting in the previous games you were playing... Sorry, but what you did does look like distance attempt at worst and shading of Town!Bookwyrm at best.
Pookina weighs in on the GymHenson / ZFR situation.

avatar
Pookina: You know, I usually don't take action on Day 1 (or take it late anyway) because it's the most pointless day of all and it has the highest likelihood of a mislynch, but this persistent questioning and bringing up of ZFR "tunneling" seems to me that, besides it ironically* being tunneling on ZFR himself, also feels like a shallow attempt to subconsciously shade him in our minds.
ZFR follows up on GymHenson's contradictions.

avatar
ZFR: Wait, so which one is it? First you're trying to convince me your post was almost 100% not serious, now you're saying you wanted to test reactions? That makes no sense.

You can't have it both ways. You can't test reaction to your post if your post is not serious because reactions to non-serious posts are meaningless. If your post was not serious than what kind of reaction where you testing for? "lol" "haha" "very funny"?
Lifthrasil joins in on the contradictory nature of GymHenson.

avatar
Lifthrasil: That is actually a good point. GH suspecting Boowyrm early because of a RVS post looked, to me, like the usual GH quirkiness. His tunneling on ZFR while accusing ZFR of tunneling is also not unusual. But his defense against ZFR's questions starts to look more and more off and here ZFR caught him at an acual self-contradiction.
ZFR gets a town vibe from GymHenson, but doesn't specify why.

avatar
ZFR: Well, looks like that's another wrong theory. I got a Town tell from GH. Could be scum GH improving his game, but I don't think so.

Lift's latest is giving me bad vibes. He's admitting I have a point against GH but is keeping a vote on catte because... catte's not paying attention to the OP?
ZFR then sort of explains it.

avatar
ZFR: Anyway, here it is. I probably should get AF for better iso, but I don't like installing third party scripts
"I shall gladly have a slight chuckle from the sidelines should I get lynched."
GH has made a similar comment in all recent games he was Town, except ACME one.
But... he was only scum, in Shining and NRA both before he started making such statement.
There is quite a bit of back-and-forth between GymHenson and ZFR on page 3 that I haven't included, as it doesn't really add much to the conversation that the quotes above have already done.

I forgot to include Pookina in the below earlier.

Leaning Town: Lifthrasil, blotunga, Pookina
Leaning Scum: GymHenson, Bookwyrm627, Microfish_1

avatar
Pookina: If you refer to the Shining game, where he and I were the mafiosi, there were times when I needed his input on a matter but I simply couldn't find him online. AFAIK there were even times he was posting in the thread while I was like "oh gemrunner where are you?". So I don't think his opinion about daychat is anything more than NAI.
That's a fair point.


avatar
Lifthrasil: Is Microfish actually a double-voter? Or was that an error? ;-)
avatar
GymHenson: Pinging to ask what you think re: Nmillar seeming to just repeat part of what you said in post 408 in their post 410(I illustrate what I mean in post 412, first bit).
As nmillar observed, this is in principle a main part of my suspicion. Nmillar seems to just repeat what others have written and go along with it. But in this case you have been corrected further below.

avatar
blotunga: Very useful from past experience.
avatar
nmillar: Town points for blotunga; I don't think he would have openly-admitted how useful day chat is so quickly if he was scum. Worth noting that Lifthrasil also responded in the same way in the very next post, but no idea how long after blotunga's post this was.
I don't remember either how much time was between those. But it doesn't really matter. Why would scum not admit that Daychat is useful? It is simple enough information and basically common knowledge among those, who have played with Daychat in the past. And I, as scum, would totally admit that it is useful. Why not? It's an easy way to appear helpful to reply to such a question about mechanics.

avatar
dedoporno: VOTE COUNT

GymHenson 3 - Pookina (#332), nmillar (#372), blotunga (#424)
Lifthrasil 1 - Microfish_1 (#353)
nmillar 3 - Lifthrasil (#378), Bookwyrm627 (#389), GymHenson (#400)
trentonlf 1 - Microfish_1 (#364)

Not voting: Catte

With 9 players it takes 5 votes to achieve a lynch.

GymHenson and nmillar are closest to lynch at L-2.

D2 ends in just under 1.5 days.
You still have Microfish as voting twice!
Lifthrasil has turned his attention to Catte, who has been very inactive throughout this game.

avatar
Lifthrasil: First I thought Catte's vote was a joke. But then he doubled down and made Joe's absence his reason for leaving the vote where it is. That looks to me as if he didn't care whom he voted and then used the percieved absence of Joe as a convenient excuse to turn the RVS-vote a bit more serious.
Which Bookwyrm627 immediately argues.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Your interpretation of this event makes my head hurt, because (to my mind) it seems like a nonsensical chain of logic on your part. Counter-intuitively, this leads me to think you might be town because scum!you wouldn't be reaching like this.
Microfish_1 posts this interesting comment. Perhaps seeking to defend himself for not playing as he normally would as town?

avatar
Microfish_1: Hmmmm... I know I sometimes lack consistency as town (you can see this in my previous town games) because I derail my train of thought from Day to Day or even on the same day....sometimes even in the same argument. >:(
How accurate is your gut, historically?
Oh, GymHenson ... what is the point of this?

avatar
GymHenson: That aside, a bit of musing and a question: if there were two scum factions in a game(i mean in general) and they didn't know each others members, then they would be somewhat blind in a way, wouldn't they?
More town points for Pookina. History does suggest that town are generally more inattentive than scum, as the latter are trying harder to blend in.

avatar
Pookina: Complacency or inattentiveness in the games I played is a trait I've seen in both camps, but in my personal experience I see the opposite: town are more careless and inattentive than scum a lot of the time. Remember that time I derpcleared myself by saying we were hunting for three scumbuddies when it was explicitly stated to be two? Not that this couldn't be abused by scum, mind you, but I don't see enough precedence to make it anything more than NAI.
Catte arrives and explains the inattentiveness.

avatar
my name is capitayn catte: And yes, me thinking Joe was playing had nothing to do with anything real life. I did read some of the OP, I just didn't pay attention to the player list. I usually don't, because I'll already be aware of who is playing from following the sign up thread. The difference here is the long time span between the sign ups and the game starting.
Which Lifthrasil accepts.

avatar
Lifthrasil: Allright. I am actually content with Catte's answer. Feels genuine.
The rest of page 4 contains a number of posts about FlockeSchnee requesting a replacement, and Lifthrasil mis-understanding my reply.

avatar
Lifthrasil: Upon re-reading I wonder: is this true? Or do you use your relative new-ness as cover to try to fly under the radar? Or is it true AND you use it as as cover?
Getting towards the half-way point, and no change to my leans, though I am starting to have doubts about where I've placed Lifthrasil and GymHenson, so the latter's claim will be interesting.

Leaning Town: Lifthrasil, blotunga, Pookina
Leaning Scum: GymHenson, Bookwyrm627, Microfish_1

Based on the above, the most likely team are Bookwyrm627 and Microfish_1. Cue someone accusing me of contradicting myself, as I've previously stated that I look at individuals rather than a team, but I'm actually naming them individually as my most likely rather than any interactions between them.

avatar
Lifthrasil: I don't remember either how much time was between those. But it doesn't really matter. Why would scum not admit that Daychat is useful? It is simple enough information and basically common knowledge among those, who have played with Daychat in the past. And I, as scum, would totally admit that it is useful. Why not? It's an easy way to appear helpful to reply to such a question about mechanics.
It doesn't really, I'm just posting my observations as I work my way through the thread. It's the speed at which blotunga responded that gives him town points for me.
avatar
dedoporno: VOTE COUNT

GymHenson 3 - Pookina (#332), nmillar (#372), blotunga (#424)
Lifthrasil 1 - Microfish_1 (#353)
nmillar 3 - Lifthrasil (#378), Bookwyrm627 (#389), GymHenson (#400)
trentonlf 1 - Microfish_1 (#364)

Not voting: Catte

With 9 players it takes 5 votes to achieve a lynch.

GymHenson and nmillar are closest to lynch at L-2.

D2 ends in just under 1.5 days.
You have Microfish voting twice. I am not voting and if one of those votes belongs to me then

UNVOTE



To all, I think Nmillar is a bad lynch and I have no interest in voting him. I see my requests from everyone to please give me their top two scum choices and why was ignored by most (thanks to those that actually answered), but then again I am not surprised as it seems that people trying to actually work together to push others does not happen often and scum tend to find ways to maneuver around most interactions.

Also, why do so many people keep referring to something ZFR said or theorized like it's gospel when he's not here to agree or possibly change his position on? I find it funny how often people try to use a players words or actions that are not even in the game to make a point or push a lynch. I prefer to draw my own conclusions with the help of others (and yes that can include people not in the game) and not just use something someone else has said to base my vote or opinion on, especially if that someone is not even in the game anymore to possibly change their position or view point.

I will be in training most of today again and it will likely be this evening before I get the chance to post once more.

As of right now I would gladly lynch anyone except nmillar or Bookwyrm, and that's because my gut tells me that they are town.
My bad. The forum has been terrible with showing me exactly who is quoting me where and I missed the double vote pointings.


VOTE COUNT

GymHenson 3 - Pookina (#332), nmillar (#372), blotunga (#424)
nmillar 3 - Lifthrasil (#378), Bookwyrm627 (#389), GymHenson (#400)
trentonlf 1 - Microfish_1 (#364)

Not voting: Catte, trentonlf

With 9 players it takes 5 votes to achieve a lynch.

GymHenson and nmillar are closest to lynch at L-2.

D2 ends in just over 1 day.


This should be better.
More on Lifthrasil's misunderstanding, summarised quite nicely by ZFR.

avatar
Lifthrasil: nmillar himself stresses that he's inexperienced.
avatar
ZFR: He said the exact opposite. He said he's experienced.
FlockeSchnee votes no lynch. Scum points.

avatar
FlockeSchnee: I (still) don't see any Mafia, so I vote accordingly:

vote No-Lynch

@dedo: If no-lynch isn't an official option (didn't see it in the first post on a quick skim), please take it as me as ramaining not-voting.
Which is quite rightly picked up on by Lifthrasil.

avatar
Lifthrasil: Really? After the discussion that it would be prudent to conserve our no-lynch safety margin you vote no-lynch? So do you disagree with wanting to keep that safety net? Or do you expect that you'll see any Mafia tomorrow, without having a wagon to analyze?
To which Catte responds to by also voting no lynch ...

avatar
my name is capitayn catte: I'm actually tempted to vote no lynch.

1. The Maths™ supports it. This is something I learned when running my previous game.

2. I missed a couple of days toDay so the deadline feels shorter to me than it otherwise would have. I don't want to ask for an extension, but I also don't have any strong reasons to vote for anyone.

Given that NL on D1 is actually not bad with the numbers we have, I

vote nolynch

for now.
Which Bookwyrm627 immediately questions.

avatar
Bookwyrm627: Let's say we No Lynch. What do we learn, at all, from that? What does a No Lynch tell us about who is and is not scum? How can a No Lynch help us in the future determine who is and is not scum?
And Pookina also weighs in.

avatar
Pookina: I quickly skim all the articles from my last appearance (when?) up until now, and I see a growing list of no-lynch support, and let just add my opinion here:

no.
Time to expand on the town / scum list.

Strong Town: blotunga, Pookina
Leaning Town: Lifthrasil
Neutral: Catte, FlockeSchnee / trentonlf (though dislike both voting no lynch on D1)
Leaning Scum: GymHenson, Microfish_1, Bookwyrm627
Strong Scum: nobody
avatar
my name is capitayn catte: Suggest they claim by all means, but don't intentionally reduce their potential hiding places.
Unless that's exactly what he WANTS you to think, and he secretly plans to reveal himself at 2v1!

I mean, if Trent actually decloaks as IC later, what are we going to do? Call him a scummy liar?

(Of course, if he's scum, then his pseudo-vanilla claim doesn't mean anything either; the number of places IC could be hiding isn't reduced.)

---

In other news, I see nmillar is working his way up to voting for me. OMGUS! Well, OMGIS, I guess. :)
avatar
Bookwyrm627: In other news, I see nmillar is working his way up to voting for me. OMGUS! Well, OMGIS, I guess. :)
Actually, you gained a few town points for your opposition to no lynch on D1. Not moving my vote at the moment in any case, until GymHenson makes an appearance with his claim.
avatar
my name is capitayn catte: Suggest they claim by all means, but don't intentionally reduce their potential hiding places.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Unless that's exactly what he WANTS you to think, and he secretly plans to reveal himself at 2v1!

I mean, if Trent actually decloaks as IC later, what are we going to do? Call him a scummy liar?
And why, exactly, did you have to call attention to this possibility?