#73 - quoted Joe, voted scene
#75 - quoted gogtrial
#126 - quoted Joe and scene, voted trent [his last vote]
#147 - GameRager, flub, trent, blotunga and scene
#153 - trent
#182 - trent, Joe, GameRager, dedoporno
#202 - Bookwyrm, GameRager, gogtrial
#214 - gogtrial
#227 - dedoporno
#230 - dedoporno, continuing #227
#278 - Bookwyrm, scene, gogtrial
#311 - scene
#318 - flub, gogtrial, scene, blotunga, Joe
#355 - Joe, Bookwyrm
For Carr himself, there is not much to go by. As said in the other post, he has not interacted with Microfish, SirPrimalform, and myself in his 14 posts. His first post begins with voting scene, then the third changes to trent and he stays there for the rest fo the Day. According to #73 and #75, he voted scene despite of a serious vote being on him.
pre-post edit: @agentcarr: that is worded like an RVS vote. Are you aware that Bookwyrm already placed a serious vote on scene? (And me as well now.)
Strangely enough in #126, he makes fun of scene's repeated usage of "analytical," and...
supplementscene: agentcarr16: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
analysis... analysed... analysis
However, vote trentonlf
(rest of quote addresses Joe's underlines in Joe-96, cut to shorten the quote)
I can't make sense of the sudden vote change. Especially when scene was mentioned the topic before the vote.
He explains it later in #147.
Do I smell funny or something?
Yes. We didn't want to make it a big deal, but we've decided to stage an intervention.
Was waiting for this...=D
I like you.
I'm quite willing to lunch flub
I'm sure he'd appreciate that, but I think he's taken.
I'm actually tempted to put an RVS vote
on Agent for his lack of explanation for his votes
...that's not what that word means.
As for trentonlf, votes 3-4 are pivotal and I like his less than I like gogtrial34987's.
He seems to believe in the whole "votes 3-4 are important" bit in the same way scene believes the same for 3-5. Seems like the flub-related comments are related to blotunga voting flub after the latter voted him.
Implied scene looks the way he always looks (basically he has no alignment pinned down)
So you vote me because I was the fourth vote on Scene’s wagon? I find him to be scummy and voted him, it’s the same thing I would do for anyone else I found to be scummy. Is there a reason you are trying to make Scene’s wagon look like a townie being lynched? I mean why else would you be trying to insinuate that vote positions on someone’s wagon matter at this point. Now if Scene is lynched and flips town then you’re absolutely right that the votes should be scrutinized, but right now with no information to go on other than people’s actions or behavior vote position means very little.
Scene looks like scene always looks: like an "analyst." I don't find him scummy. Ergo...
Aside from that, there seems to be some stuff that I think are noise. The one thing in common is that he keeps mentioning flub and how he's his favorite player, etc, but they don't seem serious game-wise. I think his most serious post is this.
Bookwyrm627: agentcarr16: Post 74
Where/when, and how so?
he questions my RVS vote because he's voting seriously. Post 123
he is urging scene to consider my RVS vote suspicious. Post 187
he has decided that I am scum-buddies with scene because I RVS voted scene in order to leave the wagon that literally hadn't formed yet (!?!)
but that I obviously knew would form... somehow?
He has also thrown shade my at vote for trentonlf because he doesn't believe that wagon positions are enough to vote on. If that's his opinion, fair enough, but it seems odd to me.
supplementscene: agentcarr16: Heh
he gets 2 for the price of 1
From your vantage point of a leaf in the wind, do you have any thoughts about Bookwyrm, GameRager, microfish, and Pooka? Would you leave flub for any of them?
Leaning town on Bookwyrm. His fixation on myself is a symptom of his admiration for myself and should in no way be concerning.
I am neutral on all three of GameRager, Microfish_1, and PookaMustard. I would never leave flubbucket
, but I'm unlikely to vote for him at present.
First he begins suspecting gogtrial using the posts he linked at the top, as well as the thing with vote positions. Then he spoke of who he was neutral on. Which I can't discern much out of other than he's misrepresenting gogtrial the same way scene does.
Carr is a really tough nut to crack. I can't discern much from either him or SPF, other than their reads on players and who they did not interact with.