Calling Beamdog company a parasite is not a slander, it's just a pure fact. They take a perfectly good product (which with mods is even better), add "EE " to the title and call it a day while at the same time they remove original creators as was the case with Planescape Torment. They've been around for almost 9 years now and to this day they've only made mods and no original content. Siege of Dragonspear is nothing more than a shitty mod that sold very poorly and it's no wonder that after that fiasco they haven't made anything as "ambitious" as this but instead went after Planescape Torment and now Neverwinter Nights.
Anyway, the most disturbing thing in all this is GOG fanboyism and double standards. For some reason GOG is being defended for censoring and removing a perfectly viable GOGmix list that was around for almost a year. They (GOG) haven't given any explanation other than "this is our site and we don't have to explain ourselves" and they just prefer to sweep it under the rug, the sooner the better. In reality it's a slippery slope and as I've said, sooner or later some of you apologists will stand on the other side of this but then there will be dozens other fanboys who will downvote your posts and will ignore even most logical arguments.
Also, someone in this thread here said that even though Beamdog is a pathetic company a list that can hurt them shouldn't exist. WTF? Firstly, why would a list like that hurt them? A product is either good or it's not and a GOGmix would be one of the last things one would take into account when buying a product. Secondly, even if somehow a company would be affected, people who work at gaming companies wouldn't have problems finding a better job. Proof of this was the lead for P:T EE who changed his job soon after P:T EE release. So why was this list removed really?
If you don't want to discuss it then why are you responding to my posts? Fuck logic.
I was hoping that you would continue the discussion bringing new arguments to the table but instead you ignore all that has been said before and are simply demanding things that are just not reasonable imo. That's why I finally decided to stop continuing this argumentation from my side (I don't like ruinning in circles).
(And this is just an explanation for the fact I don't want to discuss this anymore not a try to continue the discussion instead - so I don't expect you to reply).
I have been bringing arguments and you're the one who's ignoring them. But not only you, it seems a way to deal with GOG criticism is just by downvoting a critic and saying "funny" one-liners like Breja.
Anyway, if you think that demanding for my list to be brought back or at least renamed is unreasonable and if you can't see that such censorship and letting even such small companies as Beamdog dictate the terms is a slippery slope then yeah, we have nothing to discuss.