Posted January 16, 2018
I'd say changing one's standards when it becomes 'inconvient' is hypocritical... but... whatever. Replace the word with 'shady' or something else if it suits better.
thomq: Well, okay, if that's how you use the term, but I think you're using different dictionaries than I am.
Regret using them as examples if so. Not interested in getting their lists taken down.
adaliabooks: I'm fairly sure if anyone reported those GOG mixes they'd be deleted too (they still might if any blue is reading this and feels it's worth doing), the difference being EA probably don't care enough to check for and report these things whereas Beamdog clearly do.
Agree about BeamDog... my issue has been with how they go about it. I lost all respect for them as a company during the release of SoD when they purged and censored critics. Many of you may feel THIS is justified, but I saw numerous unjustified versions of this where reasonable critics would receive vile harassment on their forums with nothing done about it. When the forum goers who were harassed had enough and returned insults, even lesser ones they were banned for good while the instigators got off with slaps on the wrist. Then you had one of the devs going onto social media platforms to ask for good reviews.
There is a reason only sycophants remain on BD forums.
Post edited January 16, 2018 by GreasyDogMeat