timppu: For me personally it is because the initiative appears to be ok with DRM (as long as the publishers are somehow "obliged" to keep the DRM working so that people can keep playing the game in the foreseeable future).
Also I generally dislike the idea of EU bureaucrats meddling with things they don't understand, and possibly making things just worse (e.g. many games specifically not being released in EU due to some stupid restrictions).
I am more of the "vote with your wallet"-type of guy, not the "give more power to idiot EU bureaucrats in Brussels". That is why I buy my games almost exclusively on GOG, with my wallet.
Yes, but unfortunately this initiative may just make things worse. Much worse. Worst of the worstestest!
I think people should have faith in EU. I really do. Watching US and Russia right now I think EU really is, with all its flaws, the best place on earth. I don't think the politician at Bruxelles are all " idiot bureaucrats", if you really think they are it just means we all are since EU is a democracy.
If a game does not release in the biggest market on the planet just because the EU put a law to protect customers it means it probably got always online anyway so there is no reason to even be sad about it.
And about "vote with your wallet" I still do it, but it usually does not work. The market never fully self-regulates, there always needs to be some political correction to direct the market so that it does not abuse regular people.
There are many examples but I will only give one: if a company is a monopolist or many companies agree to form a cartel (so for example one company or an agreement to sell all games that stop working without warning) I think it is important that the law intervenes to avoid abuses.
Vote with your wallet only works if like 90% are doing it, otherwise it is still important to do it but it does not change anything.