It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
(ø,ø): Or maybe, just maybe, it's a case of some just want without putting in any effort at all, while others puts in the tiniest fraction of effort to be present.
avatar
Braggadar: Pretty sure you can find pre-coded solutions online which facilitate automated notifications. You don't have to be able to code these days, you just need to find someone who has done the work for you.

I'm on this forum frequently. In fact I post more than twice a day and read responses even more than that. And strangely enough I'm always too late to request a normal key. Funny that, eh? Back in finkleroy's time (and I believe even lone_scout) I had even less time on my hands and yet I still didn't find it as hard as I do now to be on time for a request.

Let me be clear: what I do in posting on the forum isn't for the benefit of receiving a gift. It's always an afterthought - the primary reason I'm here is to engage with the community in meaningful discussion. Same reason I engage with the Reddit sub, the Discord servers and other smaller communities scattered across the web. If it weren't for the discussion I wouldn't be here.

Maybe that's my failing? Chatting to others and reading from the forum rather than sitting and refreshing the giveaway thread? Maybe I should put less effort in engaging with the people of this place and instead put more effort in on trying to get a gift?

Of course, that would mean that there's no nefarious plan going on in the background, no paranoid scheme happening, but people are free to believe whatever they want to believe. I choose to live in world that isn't riddled with paranoia.
avatar
Braggadar: We're not discussing a "nefarious plan" but merely investigating the possibilities over why the games are being requested so quickly after a drop. No twiddling of mustachios, reciting monologues or tying innocents to railway tracks, just the all-too-common human phenomenon of people who take advantage of charity at any means necessary at a detriment to their fellow man.
It wasn't directed solely at you. Maybe I missed any earlier mentions, but I believe the idea of people using bots originated from a user who's already shown their paranoid opinions and misguided crusades for justice in a couple of other discussions. Sadly, some minds will let themselves be influenced by such ideas, no matter the source.
avatar
Stiffkittin: *snip*
As another user suggested, this may be a lack of imagination on your part.
*snip*
avatar
(ø,ø): I'd argue that you are the one who lacks imagination if you can't see how longer cooldowns will lead to games lingering longer on the list
The comment you quoted was about the value of the draw alongside the existing system, not debating the merits of an extended cooldown.
avatar
Stiffkittin: The comment you quoted was about the value of the draw alongside the existing system, not debating the merits of an extended cooldown.
Yeah, and the two points are part of the same discussion, they're not mutually exclusive... Especially since one affects the other.
I'm not interested in just repeating myself, or running in circles with you, however. BenKii made his decision almost a week ago. Continuing this discussion at this point is just a waste of time. Feel free to keep discussing it with other people, though.
avatar
Stiffkittin: The comment you quoted was about the value of the draw alongside the existing system, not debating the merits of an extended cooldown.
avatar
(ø,ø): Yeah, and the two points are part of the same discussion, they're not mutually exclusive... Especially since one affects the other.
I'm not interested in just repeating myself, or running in circles with you, however. BenKii made his decision almost a week ago. Continuing this discussion at this point is just a waste of time. Feel free to keep discussing it with other people, though.
I agree it's for the best. If you have trouble keeping your quotes straight to extensively argue your single point against assertions that weren't made, then it is a waste of time.
avatar
(ø,ø): Yeah, and the two points are part of the same discussion, they're not mutually exclusive... Especially since one affects the other.
I'm not interested in just repeating myself, or running in circles with you, however. BenKii made his decision almost a week ago. Continuing this discussion at this point is just a waste of time. Feel free to keep discussing it with other people, though.
avatar
Stiffkittin: I agree it's for the best. If you have trouble keeping your quotes straight to extensively argue your single point against assertions that weren't made, then it is a waste of time.
You have to find yourself another dance partner. As I said, I'm not interested.
avatar
Stiffkittin: I agree it's for the best. If you have trouble keeping your quotes straight to extensively argue your single point against assertions that weren't made, then it is a waste of time.
avatar
(ø,ø): You have to find yourself another dance partner. As I said, I'm not interested.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
In the future, will there be the option to ask for steam games too?
avatar
cobraregala2013: In the future, will there be the option to ask for steam games too?
Not on the GOG giveaway thread. There used to be a Non-GOG giveaway thread but no-one wanted to take up hosting it, so it hasn't been going for a few years now.
avatar
cobraregala2013: In the future, will there be the option to ask for steam games too?
Besides, the question would be whether non-GOG games can be donated, since you can't ask for what's not there.
(The answer's still no.)
that's sad. since we wanted some games that are only on steam,. but we lack money since we live in a poor country
Carrying this over from the main thread:
avatar
BenKii: So regarding the starred drawing for "Old World + Behind the Throne + Heroes of the Aegean + Pharaohs of the Nile". What I'll do is that anyone that is interested in only just the DLC will get a 1 month cooldown if they win and the runner up who gets the base game will get a 2 month cooldown. I find that to be the most fair since the 3 month cooldown was intended for the entire package.
avatar
mrkgnao: Shouldn't it be the other way round, since the DLCs are currently quite a bit more expensive than the base game?
I think the base game should always have a 2 month cooldown, given that that's the policy for standard keys now. (And I know I'd immediately have asked for just the base game if it was a standard key). It also makes sense to me that a single DLC would get a 1 month cooldown, since the "market" for DLC will be much smaller. In this case, with a request for two major DLC, I'd support that getting a 2 month cooldown as well (so 2 + 2), but don't feel strongly about it.
avatar
gogtrial34987: Carrying this over from the main thread:
avatar
mrkgnao: Shouldn't it be the other way round, since the DLCs are currently quite a bit more expensive than the base game?
avatar
gogtrial34987: I think the base game should always have a 2 month cooldown, given that that's the policy for standard keys now. (And I know I'd immediately have asked for just the base game if it was a standard key). It also makes sense to me that a single DLC would get a 1 month cooldown, since the "market" for DLC will be much smaller. In this case, with a request for two major DLC, I'd support that getting a 2 month cooldown as well (so 2 + 2), but don't feel strongly about it.
I agree with you broadly but feel that last bit is getting too granular. No starred option has ever been just DLC, so grading it on a value scale isn't necessary imo. It doesn't matter how much it all costs now. As you point out, DLC is a far smaller market than base game experiences so one, or multiple, should probably just maintain the same cooldown.
TLDR: favoring/supporting a (2 + 2) solution

>> Seems fair to me. Since the DLCs are useless without the base game and the base game is a complete experience on its own.

No, the DLCs should definitely have 2 months cooldown, because they are more expensive together and much rarer than the base game. For many games, the base game is heavily discounted or even given away for free via Amazon Prime/Luna ̶o̶r̶ ̶E̶p̶i̶c̶.
The argument that "DLCs on their own are useless" doesn't apply here because they are sought after only by exactly those people who already own the base game. Non-owners would never complain about 2 months cooldown for DLCs anyways.

(edit: And seemingly just to prove the point, another guy applied solely for the Old World DLCs)
Post edited February 24, 2026 by g2222
I didn't wanna take part in this because I'm taking part in the draw, but since when is the cost of a game a part of the cooldown period? DOOM (2016) has been a €3.xx game since its release on GOG, and it's been given the 3-month cooldown treatment the few times it's been under the Starred category.

If we're going by price, then the whole package of Old World+DLC should be considerably more than 3 months.

What I'm trying to say is that focusing on the price is unreasonable (and underlines the issue with the Starred category).
Post edited February 24, 2026 by TheDudeLebowski
avatar
g2222: The argument that "DLCs on their own are useless" doesn't apply here...
The argument wasn't objecting to the value of those additions to existing owners of the game, so unsure what you're unhappy about with this statement. What Epic, Steam or Amazon offer for the base game was not what what we were discussing here I believe, although correct me if I am wrong.

avatar
g2222: No, the DLCs should definitely have 2 months cooldown, because they are more expensive together and much rarer than the base game.
I'd reiterate my thought in the reply directly above yours. Furthermore, individual DLC tends to drop in value and demand quickly, whether through GOTY editions, bundles or otherwise. Itemizing that value in a giveaway seems like a poor use of effort and goodwill.
Post edited February 25, 2026 by Stiffkittin