It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Entering a new year is like leveling up in a game – new adventures and challenges await, which you approach with all previously gained skills. This is a moment that drives us, and today we’d like to give you a general overview of what is to come this year on GOG, but without spoilers – no one likes those.

2021 went with many exciting activities on GOG as well as – let’s be open about it – with some hard knocks. All of those events allow us to gain more experience, learn from our successes and mistakes and grow in our constant pursuit of delivering you the best gamer-centric platform – with a selection of exceptional games, from timeless classics to new releases, and respect for ownership. This approach won’t change this year either, and we’d like to let you know about two areas that we’re putting in the spotlight in 2022.

Let’s start with the platform experience. This is a big one, as we want you to have the best experience when buying the game of your choosing, browsing the catalog, checking the best deals and new releases, finding hidden gems, or discovering that next game to play! There is a lot we can improve here – we know – and this year our development teams’ pipelines are full of projects we hope you’ll enjoy. While we won’t be sharing the exact features just yet, we want to highlight the few that have already been released and are available on GOG, which should give you a good sense of things to come.

First and foremost is the new and improved catalog that has recently gone live to all users. It brings you a new way to carry out more customized searches, sort and filter games by price and release date range, genres, and tags. With your help, we were able to first test the new catalog by slowly rolling it out to more users, monitoring its performance, and gathering initial feedback. Judging by some of your comments, we can already see you appreciate the ease of navigating the offer, especially during bigger sales, and how fast the catalog works – thanks! Our devs are planning further improvements like expanding the tags system – adding new ones, improving filtering, or giving an option to exclude tags from results. Oh, and one more thing – we've heard you were missing the "all-time bestsellers" sorting option. Well, it's back!



Secondly, we want to keep on improving your experience with GOG GALAXY. The client remains an important part of our platform and offers a unique way of interacting with GOG, if you decide to use it. Our approach right now focuses on making the main view in GOG GALAXY more dynamic and live – one way to do it is to show what cool stuff is happening on the platform, something you may have noticed during the Winter Sale when we highlighted the event and the giveaways. In the coming weeks, we will be testing some more changes in the client, so if you’d like to see them first, make sure to toggle the “Experimental features and updates” option in the settings.

And since we’re on the topic of testing, there are more features to come this year, and we’d like to keep you involved in the process. That’s why, before releasing improvements to all users, we will be asking some of you to test these ideas and share your feedback with us, just as we did with the new catalog. With some features, we’ll want to surprise you, so expect the unexpected improvements as well!

And what is the second area of our focus, you may ask. It’s games, of course! But not just any games – it’s about classics. While we’re years from calling ourselves Good Old Games, we remember our roots, and those games will always have a special place in our hearts and on GOG. We get that actions speak louder than words, that’s why we will increase our activities around classic games. This means a plethora of things – from preparing articles and interviews about those meaningful titles, running dedicated sales and special deals, through adding more digital goodies all the way to releasing even more classic games we all miss. As for the latter, obviously we’ll keep those surprises a secret for now, but looking at the classics we brought back in Q4 2021, like Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain or Star Trek: Armada I & II, you get what we’re aiming for.



Just like with the store experience, the same goes for classic games – you may have already seen our first activities around them. For some time now we’re cooperating with The Video Game History Foundation on the Throwback Thursday initiative. Putting a spotlight on our favorite “good old games”, and adding personal stories from the GOG Team members was a no-brainer and we don’t know why it took us so long! The formula is still evolving though, so expect some updates here as well.

During the Winter Sale, thanks to the Foundation’s huge archive of assets, we were able to add new bonus goodies to titles like Tomb Raider 1+2+3, , [url=https://www.gog.com/en/game/total_anihilation_commander_pack]Total Annihilation, Thief The Dark Project, and more. Your reception was amazing – for the very first time we’ve put on sale The Video Game History Foundation Support Pack, a bundle from which all proceeds go to the Foundation. Thanks to you, we managed to gather more than $4,000 USD that will support preserving, celebrating, and teaching the history of video games. You’re the best – thank you!



That is all for now – while we don’t want to spoil any specific features, releases, or activities, we hope you like this small heads-up from us at GOG. Let us know if this type of update is something you would like to see more often, what is missing that you would definitely want us to share (having in mind sometimes we just can’t reveal some of the stuff), and share constructive feedback about our plans for 2022!
low rated
avatar
rjbuffchix: Additionally, GWENT is an example of a game (insofar as a microtransaction vehicle can be called a "game") that is on GOG and requires online connection to play. Why?
avatar
Krogan32: A game solely focused on PvP has online requirement. Oh. My. GAUD! FYI: There is a singleplayer version of GWENT that doesn't require online. Seriously, you are becoming more and more ludicrous in your anti-GoG hysteria.
By your logic, GOG should bring Fortnite to this store. No thank you.

The so-called singleplayer version of GWENT, Thronebreaker, which you are referring to, would have been a purchase for me when it released, except it still to this day as far as I know forces GWENT into a user's library and comes with various "free" "bonus" items for GWENT. The impression I get is thus that Thronebreaker is a vehicle to get people playing the online GWENT, "the game they really want you to play."

This is similar to how Rockstar released GTA V with a totally "free" "bonus" game GTA Online, wow two games in one, how magnanimous of them! When in fact singleplayer expansions appear to have been scrapped over half a decade ago as all care goes into "the game they really want you to play" which is the Online. If you are a fan of the online gaming that is fine but why does it need to be part of a DRM-free store when it is at best of dubious compatibility?
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: A game solely focused on PvP has online requirement. Oh. My. GAUD! FYI: There is a singleplayer version of GWENT that doesn't require online. Seriously, you are becoming more and more ludicrous in your anti-GoG hysteria.
avatar
rjbuffchix: By your logic, GOG should bring Fortnite to this store. No thank you.
In what way would that harm you? Oh, it wouldn't. Are you incapable of not playing it? If that's a "yes", then you need to work on your self-control issues. As I said, your anti-GoG hysteria gets more and more ludicrous every single second.

avatar
rjbuffchix: The so-called singleplayer version of GWENT, Thronebreaker, which you are referring to, would have been a purchase for me when it released, except it still to this day as far as I know forces GWENT into a user's library and comes with various "free" "bonus" items for GWENT. The impression I get is thus that Thronebreaker is a vehicle to get people playing the online GWENT, "the game they really want you to play."
Here's some tinfoil. You clearly need to make yourself a hat. Seriously, if you hate GoG so much that you continue to make these outlandish and logic-free arguments, then why are you here?
low rated
avatar
rjbuffchix: By your logic, GOG should bring Fortnite to this store. No thank you.
avatar
Krogan32: In what way would that harm you? Oh, it wouldn't.
To have DRMed games here would erode the store's identity. Given that this store is the biggest DRM-free store around, having it become something else would likely be problematic for DRM-free gaming as a whole. I care about DRM-free gaming; therefore, I don't want that to happen. If you would like examples of how the erosion can happen, look at a store like Humble Bundle, which is mostly just a Scheme key reseller (and primarily for games with DRM as far as I can tell) at this point rather than at the forefront of DRM-free gaming.

avatar
rjbuffchix: The so-called singleplayer version of GWENT, Thronebreaker, which you are referring to, would have been a purchase for me when it released, except it still to this day as far as I know forces GWENT into a user's library and comes with various "free" "bonus" items for GWENT. The impression I get is thus that Thronebreaker is a vehicle to get people playing the online GWENT, "the game they really want you to play."
avatar
Krogan32: Here's some tinfoil. You clearly need to make yourself a hat. Seriously, if you hate GoG so much that you continue to make these outlandish and logic-free arguments, then why are you here?
It's a pretty obvious conclusion from deductive reasoning. I have every right to be on this forum, just as you. It is a discussion forum which includes criticism and opinions. Incidentally, from past forum discussions about Thronebreaker and its "free" GWENT, I seem to remember people being unable to have GWENT removed from their account after the fact. I don't know if that is true or not, and I had been able to get free Cyberpunk goodies removed so perhaps it is different now, but in any case it gives me pause enough to not buy Thronebreaker since I can't guarantee I'll be able to get rid of GWENT. It's bad enough that I found out after the fact that some games I have contain DRMed content/have DRM-like schemes, like Dying Light.
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: In what way would that harm you? Oh, it wouldn't.
avatar
rjbuffchix: To have DRMed games here would erode the store's identity. Given that this store is the biggest DRM-free store around, having it become something else would likely be problematic for DRM-free gaming as a whole. I care about DRM-free gaming; therefore, I don't want that to happen. If you would like examples of how the erosion can happen, look at a store like Humble Bundle, which is mostly just a Scheme key reseller (and primarily for games with DRM as far as I can tell) at this point rather than at the forefront of DRM-free gaming.
Except the fact that those games are all free and list that they're online only, because they're 100% PvP games. It's nowhere near the same as a game that is singleplayer locked behind an online system (Darkspore). Besides, GoG would never have Fortnite on this store as they wouldn't receive any of the profit that comes with that game, as it's all from in-game store sales. Therefore, your fearmongering is unfounded.

avatar
Krogan32: Here's some tinfoil. You clearly need to make yourself a hat. Seriously, if you hate GoG so much that you continue to make these outlandish and logic-free arguments, then why are you here?
avatar
rjbuffchix: It's a pretty obvious conclusion from deductive reasoning. I have every right to be on this forum, just as you. It is a discussion forum which includes criticism and opinions. Incidentally, from past forum discussions about Thronebreaker and its free GWENT, I seem to remember people being unable to have GWENT removed from their account after the fact. I don't know if that is true or not, and I had been able to get free Cyberpunk goodies removed so perhaps it is different now, but in any case it gives me pause enough to not buy Thronebreaker since I can't guarantee I'll be able to get rid of GWENT. It's bad enough that I found out after the fact that some games I have contain DRMed content/have DRM-like schemes, like Dying Light.
First, I removed the quotation marks around the word "free" from your post to make it factual, because GWENT is actually free, not free with hindrances like you are implying. Second, why would anyone remove a free game from their account? If you are claiming "because people will think they're playing it", then that is completely unhinged line of thinking as there would be zero seconds attached to their playtime. Third, Dying Light doesn't require any form of DRM except when playing multiplayer. I know... I know... you are going to argue, "BUT THAT'S WRONG!!!", which proves that you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
low rated
Haha, good show man, the mask slipped a bit with this last comment.

avatar
Krogan32: Except the fact that those games are all free and list that they're online only, because they're 100% PvP games. It's nowhere near the same as a game that is singleplayer locked behind an online system (Darkspore).
Both are examples of content locked behind an online system; the distinction is that one doesn't "have" to be locked behind an online system whereas the other requires it as part of its design. Who cares though...it's bad design and the effect is the same. Remind me again why a store that has gamepages advertising "DRM FREE. No activation or online connection required to play" needs 100% online PvP games. Can't you get them literally anywhere else? Notice the reverse is not true for offline DRM-free gaming?

avatar
Krogan32: Besides, GoG would never have Fortnite on this store as they wouldn't receive any of the profit that comes with that game, as it's all from in-game store sales. Therefore, your fearmongering is unfounded.
Perhaps you are unaware of GOG's partnership with Epic where GOG apparently provides support and refunds for DRMed Epic games that are sold through the new app store on Galaxy 2.0 (or however they word it). I don't think it would be unprecedented to have Fortnite come here. Note: this is not meant as a 1:1 analogy, but is meant to illustrate the point. I don't believe we have seen a breakdown of what GOG receives from the partnership; however, given GOG is already overwhelmed with Support requests from GOG games here on GOG's own site, I doubt there are that many people buying enough DRMed Epic games to make up for it. What is most likely given that Epic has more leverage, is that Epic would get the majority (maybe even all) of the profits while GOG's "benefit" in the deal is increased visibility and usage of Galaxy. This is more of the deductive reasoning which is apparently impermissible to you.

avatar
Krogan32: Second, why would anyone remove a free game from their account? If you are claiming "because people will think they're playing it", then that is completely unhinged line of thinking as there would be zero seconds attached to their playtime.
I am not claiming that. That means you're making a FAKE, FAUX argument, HYPOCRITE! :)

As to why someone would remove a free game, there are multiple reasons. For one, it's unnecessary clutter especially if someone has a bigger library. There may be non-gaming related reasons why someone doesn't want to have unwanted items; perhaps they are making a conscious effort to not "hoard" for example, and this would be a trigger. The primary reason for me does happen to be gaming-related: I don't want to be used to pad numbers of something I don't agree with. If GWENT is in my library, then theoretically GOG can claim "x # of users, +1, have/are interested in GWENT." I don't want that. Again, more of that pesky logic and deductive reasoning.
low rated
avatar
rjbuffchix: Haha, good show man, the mask slipped a bit with this last comment.

avatar
Krogan32: Except the fact that those games are all free and list that they're online only, because they're 100% PvP games. It's nowhere near the same as a game that is singleplayer locked behind an online system (Darkspore).
avatar
rjbuffchix: Both are examples of content locked behind an online system; the distinction is that one doesn't "have" to be locked behind an online system whereas the other requires it as part of its design. Who cares though...it's bad design and the effect is the same. Remind me again why a store that has gamepages advertising "DRM FREE. No activation or online connection required to play" needs 100% online PvP games. Can't you get them literally anywhere else? Notice the reverse is not true for offline DRM-free gaming?
Except both are 100% PvP games that have no single player content. If there's no offline content, then why would they have the game be offline? You seem to be ignoring that fact. You are engaging in hysteria for the sake of hysteria.

avatar
Krogan32: Besides, GoG would never have Fortnite on this store as they wouldn't receive any of the profit that comes with that game, as it's all from in-game store sales. Therefore, your fearmongering is unfounded.
avatar
rjbuffchix: Perhaps you are unaware of GOG's partnership with Epic where GOG apparently provides support and refunds for DRMed Epic games that are sold through the new app store on Galaxy 2.0 (or however they word it). I don't think it would be unprecedented to have Fortnite come here. Note: this is not meant as a 1:1 analogy, but is meant to illustrate the point. I don't believe we have seen a breakdown of what GOG receives from the partnership; however, given GOG is already overwhelmed with Support requests from GOG games here on GOG's own site, I doubt there are that many people buying enough DRMed Epic games to make up for it. What is most likely given that Epic has more leverage, is that Epic would get the majority (maybe even all) of the profits while GOG's "benefit" in the deal is increased visibility and usage of Galaxy. This is more of the deductive reasoning which is apparently impermissible to you.
Epic store is not a in-game store that Fortnite has. Again, you are engaging in hysteria for the sake of hysteria.
avatar
Krogan32: Second, why would anyone remove a free game from their account? If you are claiming "because people will think they're playing it", then that is completely unhinged line of thinking as there would be zero seconds attached to their playtime.
avatar
rjbuffchix: I am not claiming that.
You are lying. Your quote, "I seem to remember people being unable to have GWENT removed from their account after the fact". You were arguing for the removal of the free game of GWENT from their accounts after purchasing Thronebreaker. That is why I asked you the question that I did. It's interesting that you went to a blatantly obvious lie and then projected with your attacks against me instead of just answering my simple question in the first place.

avatar
rjbuffchix: As to why someone would remove a free game, there are multiple reasons. For one, it's unnecessary clutter especially if someone has a bigger library.
... That's beyond weak for an excuse.
avatar
rjbuffchix: There may be non-gaming related reasons why someone doesn't want to have unwanted items; perhaps they are making a conscious effort to not "hoard" for example, and this would be a trigger.
Another beyond weak excuse.
avatar
rjbuffchix: The primary reason for me does happen to be gaming-related: I don't want to be used to pad numbers of something I don't agree with. If GWENT is in my library, then theoretically GOG can claim "x # of users, +1, have/are interested in GWENT." I don't want that. Again, more of that pesky logic and deductive reasoning.
Here's some more tinfoil for your hat as you clearly need it. Seriously, conspiracy theories are really bad for one's brain.
low rated
avatar
Mori_Yuki: ...
In general, I agree that the whole thing should be more transparent and I understand people who don't like the necessity to add an exception to firewall to be able to play. I don't agree however that we should connect this with the fact of being capable of running the game without access to the internet. Being able to play offline is not the same as being able to play online (while being connected to the internet) with a firewall exception. These are two separate things in my opinion.
avatar
Longcat: ...
As Cavalry mentioned, Community Moderators are volunteers who help to moderate forums in their free time. Don't treat my declaration that I'm not a GOG employee as a stance that I don't want to take responsibility for my words. I take full responsibility for what I write here. What I meant is that I'm not an official (nor unofficial) voice of GOG. I never was a GOG employee. I'm a user who joined the platform right after it launched.

As for DRM-free declaration, I was referring to the statement posted by yourself. Currently there's no precise explanation on the site what DRM-free means, but we can safely presume that it is the option to run single player games without any client. Galaxy.dll has no influence on the fact that you can run games from offline installers without Galaxy client. As for bonus content for CP2077, it's only a bonus. You can still play the game freely without Galaxy and finish all main and side quests even without internet connection.
Post edited February 07, 2022 by Sarafan
low rated
avatar
Mori_Yuki: ...
avatar
Sarafan: In general, I agree that the whole thing should be more transparent and I understand people who don't like the necessity to add an exception to firewall to be able to play. I don't agree however that we should connect this with the fact of being capable of running the game without access to the internet. Being able to play offline is not the same as being able to play online (while being connected to the internet) with a firewall exception. These are two separate things in my opinion.
avatar
Longcat: ...
avatar
Sarafan: As Cavalry mentioned, Community Moderators are volunteers who help to moderate forums in their free time. Don't treat my declaration that I'm not a GOG employee as a stance that I don't want to take responsibility for my words. I take full responsibility for what I write here. What I meant is that I'm not an official (nor unofficial) voice of GOG. I never was a GOG employee. I'm a user who joined the platform right after it launched.

As for DRM-free declaration, I was referring to the statement posted by yourself. Currently there's no precise explanation on the site what DRM-free means, but we can safely presume that it is the option to run single player games without any client. Galaxy.dll has no influence on the fact that you can run games from offline installers without Galaxy client. As for bonus content for CP2077, it's only a bonus. You can still play the game freely without Galaxy and finish all main and side quests even without internet connection.
What I meant is that it is completely pointless to ask you about or discuss anything with you, because as you yourself state - what you have to say is just the opinions of another user that is loyal to GOG no matter what. And in no way reflects GOGs policy in any way. Because you don’t know anything more than any other user on these forums. So thanks for the response, but you are in reality just obfuscating matters even more.

And I have to say, as a moderator you are pretty bad at what you do. Any other store forums would have banned Krogan32 eons ago. But I guess it’s ok to harass and call people whatever you want around here as long as you do it in the name of GOG.
low rated
avatar
Longcat: And I have to say, as a moderator you are pretty bad at what you do. Any other store forums would have banned Krogan32 eons ago. But I guess it’s ok to harass and call people whatever you want around here as long as you do it in the name of GOG.
First, because I am the one pointing flaws in your and your ilk's "logic", I am constantly getting attacked here from your side via flat-out insults and foul language. Second, be careful what you wish for, because openly arguing with a moderator while also insulting the moderator's abilities to moderate would get you a quick permanent ban on any other forum.
low rated
avatar
Longcat: And I have to say, as a moderator you are pretty bad at what you do. Any other store forums would have banned Krogan32 eons ago. But I guess it’s ok to harass and call people whatever you want around here as long as you do it in the name of GOG.
avatar
Krogan32: First, because I am the one pointing flaws in your and your ilk's "logic", I am constantly getting attacked here from your side via flat-out insults and foul language. Second, be careful what you wish for, because openly arguing with a moderator while also insulting the moderator's abilities to moderate would get you a quick permanent ban on any other forum.
You are not getting attacked because of your opinions. You are getting legitimate responses to your toxic insults, attacks and harassment. And I’m not afraid of a ban. If anything, it would confirm my suspicion you are being protected by the moderators. You were already warned, and keep on going, with no consequences what so ever.
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: First, because I am the one pointing flaws in your and your ilk's "logic", I am constantly getting attacked here from your side via flat-out insults and foul language. Second, be careful what you wish for, because openly arguing with a moderator while also insulting the moderator's abilities to moderate would get you a quick permanent ban on any other forum.
avatar
Longcat: You are not getting attacked because of your opinions. You are getting legitimate responses to your toxic insults, attacks and harassment. And I’m not afraid of a ban. If anything, it would confirm my suspicion you are being protected by the moderators. You were already warned, and keep on going, with no consequences what so ever.
Thanks for proving my point as an absolute fact.
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: Except both are 100% PvP games that have no single player content. If there's no offline content, then why would they have the game be offline? You seem to be ignoring that fact.
I'm not ignoring that fact; actually, it is part of the questions I asked you and didn't get an answer. Namely:
-Remind me again why a store that has gamepages advertising "DRM FREE. No activation or online connection required to play" needs 100% online PvP games.
-Can't you get them literally anywhere else?
-Notice the reverse is not true for offline DRM-free gaming?

avatar
Krogan32: Epic store is not a in-game store that Fortnite has.
Fortnite is a game on Epic, unless I misunderstand how it works. If GOG can apparently sell other Epic games, even DRMed ones, then why wouldn't they be able to bring Fortnite here? Don't say lack of profits because I have addressed that already, to (again) no response.

avatar
rjbuffchix: I am not claiming that.
avatar
Krogan32: You are lying. Your quote, "I seem to remember people being unable to have GWENT removed from their account after the fact". You were arguing for the removal of the free game of GWENT from their accounts after purchasing Thronebreaker.
The part I am "not claiming" was your strawman argument that "you are claiming 'because people will think they're playing it;'" I never claimed that. Besides, not everyone even uses the profiles (even though they were automatically foisted on us which imo was to pad those numbers and try to lure more people into the social media elements of Galaxy).

If you are referring to my idea that GOG could in theory claim people with GWENT in their accounts as "GWENT users," that is a separate argument as it does not rely on tracking playtime; in fact, the idea is that they wouldn't want to factor in such things but instead would want to ignore such things in order to maximize the supposed raw number of total users.

avatar
Krogan32: ... That's beyond weak for an excuse.

Another beyond weak excuse.

Here's some more tinfoil for your hat as you clearly need it. Seriously, conspiracy theories are really bad for one's brain.
Evidently you are not interested in honest discussion, as this portion of your post is the equivalent of saying "nuh-uh!" It's a shame, because I thought you were turning over a new leaf, you even gained a new word like "hysteria." I'll see you back in the Boycott topic since you really like to hang out there.
avatar
Sarafan: Currently there's no precise explanation on the site what DRM-free means, but we can safely presume that it is the option to run single player games without any client.
Can we? The issue with the Hitman Lame of the Year release was that it required internet connection (but I'm not sure that it required client). It was removed with apologies for being released in this state.

avatar
Sarafan: Galaxy.dll has no influence on the fact that you can run games from offline installers without Galaxy client.
Could we ask a Windows XP user? My understanding is that the old installers without Galaxy.dll worked fine on that OS, but now they can't install/run the games. There are many users running Windows 7. Is their OS next to be sacrificed on the altar that is holy Galaxy? I understand these are old OSes not necessarily officially supported or what have you. But if the sole reason something doesn't work anymore is because now we have Galaxy.dlls, that isn't on the obsolete OS, it's on the push to have Galaxy in everything. I also realize many games, particularly with online multiplayer modes (this is a separate can of worms) are designed in a way that relies on framework such that Galaxy "has" to be there. I am not talking about those. Only the ones where they would work without Galaxy.dll and all else equal.

avatar
Sarafan: As for bonus content for CP2077, it's only a bonus. You can still play the game freely without Galaxy and finish all main and side quests even without internet connection.
Oh! So it is completely trivial. Great! Then there would be absolutely no problem including it in an offline installer as other games do. It is seriously an embarrassing mark on a company once known for DRM-free to have any content, no matter how minor, locked behind what is effectively a DRM gate. Rhetorical question: why are they so insistent on having this content locked behind Galaxy?
Post edited February 07, 2022 by rjbuffchix
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: Except both are 100% PvP games that have no single player content. If there's no offline content, then why would they have the game be offline? You seem to be ignoring that fact.
avatar
rjbuffchix: I'm not ignoring that fact; actually, it is part of the questions I asked you and didn't get an answer. Namely:
-Remind me again why a store that has gamepages advertising "DRM FREE. No activation or online connection required to play" needs 100% online PvP games.
-Can't you get them literally anywhere else?
-Notice the reverse is not true for offline DRM-free gaming?
<Chuckles> You contradicted yourself. You claimed that you are not ignoring my question. However, you just danced around it without answering it at all. So, I'll ask again, If there's no offline content to a game, then why would that game have an offline mode? To add to that, why does it matter to you that GWENT, which, again, costs $0 is on GoG at all? Again, it sounds to me like you are complaining for the sake of complaining.

avatar
Krogan32: You are lying. Your quote, "I seem to remember people being unable to have GWENT removed from their account after the fact". You were arguing for the removal of the free game of GWENT from their accounts after purchasing Thronebreaker.
avatar
rjbuffchix: The part I am "not claiming" was your strawman argument that "you are claiming 'because people will think they're playing it;'" I never claimed that. Besides, not everyone even uses the profiles (even though they were automatically foisted on us which imo was to pad those numbers and try to lure more people into the social media elements of Galaxy).
You were doing good for a hot minute until you jumped head first into the conspiracy theory vat. As to your fictitious claims, you missed the first word I typed in that sentence... "IF". That's a very important word as it dictates the outcome of a situation. If A happens, the consequence B follows. If not, then consequence C follows. I never said you said that. I said, IF you said that, then my assessment of your statement of that it was completely unhinged would follow. See how that works. Anyways, now that we've brushed away your intellectual dishonesty, we'll get to your original statement. Why would you comment about the potential of people unable to remove GWENT from their accounts if you weren't making that argument?

avatar
rjbuffchix: If you are referring to my idea that GOG could in theory claim people with GWENT in their accounts as "GWENT users," that is a separate argument as it does not rely on tracking playtime; in fact, the idea is that they wouldn't want to factor in such things but instead would want to ignore such things in order to maximize the supposed raw number of total users.
You're hitting the conspiracy theory cocktail again. CDPR doesn't care how many people have GWENT on their account as it's FREE. What they care about is how many people are buying stuff in the shop that is within GWENT.

avatar
Krogan32: ... That's beyond weak for an excuse.

Another beyond weak excuse.

Here's some more tinfoil for your hat as you clearly need it. Seriously, conspiracy theories are really bad for one's brain.
avatar
rjbuffchix: Evidently you are not interested in honest discussion, as this portion of your post is the equivalent of saying "nuh-uh!"
Since you didn't like what I called your excuses, what should I call them instead? Inane? Pathetic? Drivel? Seriously, you were stretching farther than Stretch Armstrong to come up with your examples. They are weak, and have no basis in reality. All to fit your anti GoG agenda.
high rated
Can we please get this topic back on track? As in, comments about GOG's plans - and yes, also current state - aimed at GOG, and eventually discussions with GOG staff if/when they reply, NOT endless back and forth between users that drown out any on topic messages (and may even include some, but who'd bother to pick them out of the mess?).
Come on already, can count the on topic messages for the past few pages on my fingers here. If somebody who's not staff replies to counter your message aimed at staff, at most reply once, if even that, and then leave it be. Valid for both / all sides.
low rated
avatar
Cavalary: Can we please get this topic back on track? As in, comments about GOG's plans - and yes, also current state - aimed at GOG, and eventually discussions with GOG staff if/when they reply, NOT endless back and forth between users that drown out any on topic messages (and may even include some, but who'd bother to pick them out of the mess?).
Come on already, can count the on topic messages for the past few pages on my fingers here. If somebody who's not staff replies to counter your message aimed at staff, at most reply once, if even that, and then leave it be. Valid for both / all sides.
+1.