It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Entering a new year is like leveling up in a game – new adventures and challenges await, which you approach with all previously gained skills. This is a moment that drives us, and today we’d like to give you a general overview of what is to come this year on GOG, but without spoilers – no one likes those.

2021 went with many exciting activities on GOG as well as – let’s be open about it – with some hard knocks. All of those events allow us to gain more experience, learn from our successes and mistakes and grow in our constant pursuit of delivering you the best gamer-centric platform – with a selection of exceptional games, from timeless classics to new releases, and respect for ownership. This approach won’t change this year either, and we’d like to let you know about two areas that we’re putting in the spotlight in 2022.

Let’s start with the platform experience. This is a big one, as we want you to have the best experience when buying the game of your choosing, browsing the catalog, checking the best deals and new releases, finding hidden gems, or discovering that next game to play! There is a lot we can improve here – we know – and this year our development teams’ pipelines are full of projects we hope you’ll enjoy. While we won’t be sharing the exact features just yet, we want to highlight the few that have already been released and are available on GOG, which should give you a good sense of things to come.

First and foremost is the new and improved catalog that has recently gone live to all users. It brings you a new way to carry out more customized searches, sort and filter games by price and release date range, genres, and tags. With your help, we were able to first test the new catalog by slowly rolling it out to more users, monitoring its performance, and gathering initial feedback. Judging by some of your comments, we can already see you appreciate the ease of navigating the offer, especially during bigger sales, and how fast the catalog works – thanks! Our devs are planning further improvements like expanding the tags system – adding new ones, improving filtering, or giving an option to exclude tags from results. Oh, and one more thing – we've heard you were missing the "all-time bestsellers" sorting option. Well, it's back!



Secondly, we want to keep on improving your experience with GOG GALAXY. The client remains an important part of our platform and offers a unique way of interacting with GOG, if you decide to use it. Our approach right now focuses on making the main view in GOG GALAXY more dynamic and live – one way to do it is to show what cool stuff is happening on the platform, something you may have noticed during the Winter Sale when we highlighted the event and the giveaways. In the coming weeks, we will be testing some more changes in the client, so if you’d like to see them first, make sure to toggle the “Experimental features and updates” option in the settings.

And since we’re on the topic of testing, there are more features to come this year, and we’d like to keep you involved in the process. That’s why, before releasing improvements to all users, we will be asking some of you to test these ideas and share your feedback with us, just as we did with the new catalog. With some features, we’ll want to surprise you, so expect the unexpected improvements as well!

And what is the second area of our focus, you may ask. It’s games, of course! But not just any games – it’s about classics. While we’re years from calling ourselves Good Old Games, we remember our roots, and those games will always have a special place in our hearts and on GOG. We get that actions speak louder than words, that’s why we will increase our activities around classic games. This means a plethora of things – from preparing articles and interviews about those meaningful titles, running dedicated sales and special deals, through adding more digital goodies all the way to releasing even more classic games we all miss. As for the latter, obviously we’ll keep those surprises a secret for now, but looking at the classics we brought back in Q4 2021, like Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain or Star Trek: Armada I & II, you get what we’re aiming for.



Just like with the store experience, the same goes for classic games – you may have already seen our first activities around them. For some time now we’re cooperating with The Video Game History Foundation on the Throwback Thursday initiative. Putting a spotlight on our favorite “good old games”, and adding personal stories from the GOG Team members was a no-brainer and we don’t know why it took us so long! The formula is still evolving though, so expect some updates here as well.

During the Winter Sale, thanks to the Foundation’s huge archive of assets, we were able to add new bonus goodies to titles like Tomb Raider 1+2+3, , [url=https://www.gog.com/en/game/total_anihilation_commander_pack]Total Annihilation, Thief The Dark Project, and more. Your reception was amazing – for the very first time we’ve put on sale The Video Game History Foundation Support Pack, a bundle from which all proceeds go to the Foundation. Thanks to you, we managed to gather more than $4,000 USD that will support preserving, celebrating, and teaching the history of video games. You’re the best – thank you!



That is all for now – while we don’t want to spoil any specific features, releases, or activities, we hope you like this small heads-up from us at GOG. Let us know if this type of update is something you would like to see more often, what is missing that you would definitely want us to share (having in mind sometimes we just can’t reveal some of the stuff), and share constructive feedback about our plans for 2022!
avatar
wolfsite: If you are going to use it against one you have to use it against all so since he isn't responding that means he is buying games.
avatar
Time4Tea: I have engaged with the user in question previously in the boycott thread and addressed their points and comments in detail. He clearly had no interest in what I had to say and ended up repeatedly branding me as a liar and hypocrite. I'm not under any obligation to continue engaging with people who are dead set on being toxic and abusive.
Then, based on Longcat, you are admitting that you are a hypocrite via your silence. Stop being a hypocrite by either answering the question or take back your snide statement against SmollestLight. But, I know you'll do neither, so keep on being proven a hypocrite.
avatar
wolfsite: The problem with this is you are setting a double standard, you can't say one person or group/company doesn't have to answer because it doesn't prove that have done anything, but then turn around and say because another group/company person doesn't answer thus it proves that are complicit.

The other problem with your argument is that there is no way to communicate with a forest because a forest is incapable of responding in a way a human can understand, thus this is not a supportive argument.

Then the third thing, you can't assume what he is thinking, you have no proof that this person believes people are hiding from them, there is nothing to support this.

As for the "It's none of your business" argument, this is a forum for GOG website users, thus anyone who has an account can participate in any discussion on it, so no one has any right to say any topic on this forum not the business of others, if you were having a private chat or message then yes that would be none of my business but this is an open forum for GOG users..

If you are bored on these forums you are more then welcome to participate in other activities such as playing some compute games, talking to friends or anything else you find interesting i'd hate to see you here if you are not enjoying it.
avatar
Longcat: Yawn. Run and play little one. I have no time for you.
Thanks for admitting that he destroyed you.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Krogan32
low rated
avatar
Time4Tea: Excellent post. Yes, GOG needs to be willing to engage in discussions about DRM-free and Devotion, if it is really serious about regaining the trust of its user base.

The 9348 people who have signed the Devotion wishlist request have still not received any acknowledgement or honest explanation.

These issues are not going to go away.

avatar
SmollestLight:
avatar
Time4Tea: Maybe it's time for you to stop dodging users' honest questions?
Maybe SmollestLight has bosses who are telling her what she can and can't respond to? I could be wrong but I think that's fair to say. I guess you could be technically channeling your anger at the people who manage her and make actual decisions for GOG.

I sometimes wonder if there's a small subset of people (not saying you) who want to annoy the community managers to the point where they quit. Of course that's just a shortsighted immature attitude, GOG will just hire new people.

Regarding Devotion, I don't think it's hard to figure out what happened, and imo people should be telling GOG not to bow to China and bring Detention and Devotion here. (I'm not sure if that's realistic or not given that even multi-billion dollar companies bow to China) Would you be more satisfied if they were open about bowing to China?

avatar
JAAHAS: It is not about GOG's willingness, but what the upper management of the CDP Group may allow them to say about the Devotion incident, which of course is nothing at all now that the gaming news sites have moved on to cover other topics.

These things tend to make a lot more sense once you remember that if GOG had been allowed to play chicken with CCP, it would have been the entire CDP Group sitting in the same handcar on rails headed to a crash with CCP's locomotive, so of course the rest of the CDP Group didn't agree to that, especially when they could order GOG to take all the blame for the cancellation of Devotion's release and the following silence.
^ More good thoughts.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by tfishell
low rated
avatar
Time4Tea: I have engaged with the user in question previously in the boycott thread and addressed their points and comments in detail. He clearly had no interest in what I had to say and ended up repeatedly branding me as a liar and hypocrite. I'm not under any obligation to continue engaging with people who are dead set on being toxic and abusive.
avatar
Krogan32: Then, based on Longcat, you are admitting that you are a hypocrite via your silence. Stop being a hypocrite by either answering the question or take back your snide statement against SmollestLight. But, I know you'll do neither, so keep on being proven a hypocrite.
avatar
Longcat: Yawn. Run and play little one. I have no time for you.
avatar
Krogan32: Thanks for admitting that he destroyed you.
Yawn. Abusive as always.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Longcat
high rated
I would like to kindly ask to remain civil in the course of discussion. Throwing accusations about hypocrisy to the left and right, as well as suggesting that someone's behavior is pathetic is on the edge of violation of our rules. Please keep the discussion civil and avoid toxic behavior.
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: I would like to kindly ask to remain civil in the course of discussion. Throwing accusations about hypocrisy to the left and right, as well as suggesting that someone's behavior is pathetic is on the edge of violation of our rules. Please keep the discussion civil and avoid toxic behavior.
Thanks for the reminder.

What is your policy on DRM?
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: I would like to kindly ask to remain civil in the course of discussion. Throwing accusations about hypocrisy to the left and right, as well as suggesting that someone's behavior is pathetic is on the edge of violation of our rules. Please keep the discussion civil and avoid toxic behavior.
well you know, since there's just so much accusations and pathetic behaviour, its maybe just the best idea to close the thread and stop this madness. the thread seems not to be of any importance anyway and the op created it just for one purpose: trolling gog customers.
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: I would like to kindly ask to remain civil in the course of discussion. Throwing accusations about hypocrisy to the left and right, as well as suggesting that someone's behavior is pathetic is on the edge of violation of our rules. Please keep the discussion civil and avoid toxic behavior.
So, if someone engages in hypocrisy, for example, claiming that someone, who is part of the GoG team dodged answering questions when that same person has dodged questions, then what am I to call their behavior? What word is more acceptable to you for that person's hypocritical behavior?
avatar
Krogan32: Then, based on Longcat, you are admitting that you are a hypocrite via your silence. Stop being a hypocrite by either answering the question or take back your snide statement against SmollestLight. But, I know you'll do neither, so keep on being proven a hypocrite.

Thanks for admitting that he destroyed you.
avatar
Longcat: Yawn. Abusive as always.
Narcolepsy is a serious medical condition.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Krogan32
low rated
:)

So, @Sarafan, what is GOG’s policy on DRM?
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: So, if someone engages in hypocrisy, for example, claiming that someone, who is part of the GoG team dodged answering questions when that same person has dodged questions, then what am I to call their behavior? What word is more acceptable to you for that person's hypocritical behavior?
The problem is not with the usage of a certain word, but rather over usage of it. When you do this the atmosphere of the discussion is getting nervous and we want to avoid that. I'll gladly continue the discussion about this topic, but through the private message system.

avatar
Longcat: :)

So, @Sarafan, what is GOG’s policy on DRM?
Nothing has changed in GOG's DRM-free policy. Offline installers are available and you can play every game that's released on GOG without internet connection. Of course some games have multiplayer features and you might need Galaxy to access them. It has been like this for years now.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Sarafan
low rated
avatar
Longcat: :)

So, @Sarafan, what is GOG’s policy on DRM?
avatar
Sarafan: Nothing has changed in GOG's DRM-free policy. Offline installers are available and you can play every game that's released on GOG without internet connection. Of course some games have multiplayer features and you might need Galaxy to access them. It has been like this for years now.
Thanks for the somewhat short reply, that did not answer my question. The question was "What IS your policy on DRM?". I do not consider connecting to the internet to play a multiplayer game to be DRM, but forcing you to use Galaxy to do so, most certainly is.

Why have you removed the policy from your site, closed down the FCK DRM site, release games like Hitman with online gated content for single player, include galaxy.dll in you offline installers, and sell games with online gated content for single player, like Cyberpunk 2077?

If it hasn't changed, where can I read your policy now? What do you consider DRM and not? It used to have its own page on the website?
low rated
avatar
Krogan32: So, if someone engages in hypocrisy, for example, claiming that someone, who is part of the GoG team dodged answering questions when that same person has dodged questions, then what am I to call their behavior? What word is more acceptable to you for that person's hypocritical behavior?
avatar
Sarafan: The problem is not with the usage of a certain word, but rather over usage of it. When you do this the atmosphere of the discussion is getting nervous and we want to avoid that. I'll gladly continue the discussion about this topic, but through the private message system.

avatar
Longcat: :)

So, @Sarafan, what is GOG’s policy on DRM?
avatar
Sarafan: Nothing has changed in GOG's DRM-free policy. Offline installers are available and you can play every game that's released on GOG without internet connection. Of course some games have multiplayer features and you might need Galaxy to access them. It has been like this for years now.
Wrong, so wrong. :)

Ken Follets Pillars of the Earth, Crookz The Big Heist (which originally started without, until recently the publisher rolled out a launcher which must be installed first and then without net-access the game refuses to start), The Legend of Heros - Trails of Cold Steel, The Legend of Heros - Trails in the Sky, Kingdom Come - Deliverance, Pathfinder: Wrath of the Righteous, to name but a few (which there are many more), try to run these games without granting access to the web in your firewall. Good luck with that.

The aforementioned games are all single player so they should not need any access to the net at all to run.

Edit: I edited out 80 Days, they seem to have patched out the Internet access requirement. While true that most games can be played offline, which in this case would mean to grant access to the net, but having to disconnect from the web so no data will be transmitted, then that's true. Should this be the way this works? If you would ask me, the answer is no.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Mori_Yuki
low rated
avatar
Longcat: ...
First of all to avoid misunderstanding, I'm not a GOG employee, so you shouldn't treat my answers as official ones. Now on to the point.

The alternative for non-Galaxy multiplayer is the lack of multiplayer. Only a small number of games these days support multiplayer that doesn't require a client. I prefer to have a Galaxy multiplayer rather than a game that's stripped of this feature completely. Almost no developer will want to spend time and resources to prepare a special version of the game for GOG that will introduce multiplayer without a client.

GOG's policy regarding DRM is still present on the main page of the service. I agree that the Hitman release was unfortunate and that's why game was removed from sale. That said, I'm aware that DRM-free market is hard and GOG might need to go on some compromises to get new titles. It's a sad reality unfortunately.
avatar
Mori_Yuki: try to run these games without granting access to the web in your firewall.
I think we're misunderstanding two things. The fact that the game sends some data (probably telemetry data) over the internet doesn't mean it has built-in DRM. The ultimate test is whether the game runs without any internet connection from the offline installer.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Sarafan
low rated
avatar
Longcat: ...
avatar
Sarafan: First of all to avoid misunderstanding, I'm not a GOG employee, so you shouldn't treat my answers as official ones. Now on to the point.

The alternative for non-Galaxy multiplayer is the lack of multiplayer. Only a small number of games these days support multiplayer that doesn't require a client. I prefer to have a Galaxy multiplayer rather than a game that's stripped of this feature completely. Almost no developer will want to spend time and resources to prepare a special version of the game for GOG that will introduce multiplayer without a client.

GOG's policy regarding DRM is still present on the main page of the service. I agree that the Hitman release was unfortunate and that's why game was removed from sale. That said, I'm aware that DRM-free market is hard and GOG might need to go on some compromises to get new titles. It's a sad reality unfortunately.
avatar
Mori_Yuki: try to run these games without granting access to the web in your firewall.
avatar
Sarafan: I think we're misunderstanding two things. The fact that the game sends some data (probably telemetry data) over the internet doesn't mean it has built-in DRM. The ultimate test is whether the game runs without any internet connection from the offline installer.
I acknowledged that it is: All games can be played offline. The reason I brought it up was not to say that this is or isn't DRM. It is a fact that many games, like the ones I named, leave me with two choices: Grant access upon first start and the game will run or I don't and the game would not start. As long as I am not in control of the data, as long as I don't know the target of this connection, I refuse to consent to this. I also see no point in going offline to avoid data leaving my PC to be transmitted to a 3rd-party who I also don't know who that is.

That's why this can be seen as some sort of restriction to the promise: Play offline. Which could also mean to be able to play them while offline without disconnecting from the web and without granting the executable any access rights. This is set automatically as far as the native Windows firewall is concerned, which I don't use.

I just don't wish such things to be present. If someone wants to receive data, feedback, then they should implement a consent form and if I then wish to transfer something to the other party, I do want to do this manually and see what's being transmitted beforehand. The game executable should not need access to the Internet to transmit whatever. That's a big no-no.

Edit: Since two of the games I mentioned didn't start, because I did not grant remote access, which in the case of Ken Follet and Trails of Cold Steel I only found out after my refund request was already processed, this is effectively going to lose you money. In the other cases it was too late for it. What this means is that GOG is effectively loosing money and the company is caused more work, because you can bet a mill that every game I have to grant access to the net, being single player, I will request a refund for it immediately.

If you insist that this is okay then put up a message on top the store page: This game will ask for remote access which has to be granted by your firewall else the game will not start. Let's see how well those games will sell once that warning/information is added.
Post edited February 06, 2022 by Mori_Yuki
low rated
avatar
Sarafan: GOG's policy regarding DRM is still present on the main page of the service. I agree that the Hitman release was unfortunate and that's why game was removed from sale. That said, I'm aware that DRM-free market is hard and GOG might need to go on some compromises to get new titles. It's a sad reality unfortunately.
Some of us also have a hard stance against DRM. And it's not just the game preservation aspect, but also the surveillance aspect or "Digital Remote Monitoring". I play games to relax, to get away from the real world where everyone is constantly judging or analyzing one. Any collection or sharing of any aspect of my gaming is a No-No.

I can only speak for myself though, and if GOG went down the DRM road, I'd probably head to another store where DRM-free is still their core philosophy.

And I get it, DRM-free is tough and GOG has been doing a good job thus far for those of us requiring client-free gaming. I appreciate that some of your more recent adults-only games have upset some gamers here, but in my case, I spent money on "Being a DIK". Sure, I'd rather have spent it on, say... "Skyrim", but DRM-free Skyrim is not here.
low rated
avatar
Longcat: ...
avatar
Sarafan: First of all to avoid misunderstanding, I'm not a GOG employee, so you shouldn't treat my answers as official ones. Now on to the point.

The alternative for non-Galaxy multiplayer is the lack of multiplayer. Only a small number of games these days support multiplayer that doesn't require a client. I prefer to have a Galaxy multiplayer rather than a game that's stripped of this feature completely. Almost no developer will want to spend time and resources to prepare a special version of the game for GOG that will introduce multiplayer without a client.

GOG's policy regarding DRM is still present on the main page of the service. I agree that the Hitman release was unfortunate and that's why game was removed from sale. That said, I'm aware that DRM-free market is hard and GOG might need to go on some compromises to get new titles. It's a sad reality unfortunately.
avatar
Mori_Yuki: try to run these games without granting access to the web in your firewall.
avatar
Sarafan: I think we're misunderstanding two things. The fact that the game sends some data (probably telemetry data) over the internet doesn't mean it has built-in DRM. The ultimate test is whether the game runs without any internet connection from the offline installer.
Ok, so you're a forum moderator on GOG, telling users they are in violation (or close to) of the rules, but not a GOG employee? And your answers are not official, so nothing you say can be taken seriously? I am so confused by this behaviour. Judging by your join date, and 'Watcher'-title, I assume you used to be an employee here. What on earth is going on?

"GOG's policy regarding DRM is still present on the main page of the service."

Where? Can you please link to it? The only thing it says is that the games are DRM-free, it in no way states what DRM-free means, or what is regarded as DRM by GOG.

I see you skipped over the rest of my questions; "Why have you removed the policy from your site, closed down the FCK DRM site, [...], include galaxy.dll in you offline installers, and sell games with online gated content for single player, like Cyberpunk 2077?".

But seeing as none of you replies are official replies from GOG anyway, I can't see the point of you answering them. From what I can tell, the unofficial response is, "Yes, GOG is compromising on DRM-free in order to bring new games to the site." If that is also the official response, then that's fine. All it means is one less customer. I'm not hoping GOG goes under, but I'm not giving you any more money either. Simply because there is no longer any reason to.