Swedrami: Not sure what I'm looking at in this article and how it's connected to the botched "DRM-free, but not really" release of HITMAN (2016) in September last year I was referring to?
Loger13: He tells you that "different publishers". Which means: No, that's not a sign.
Swedrami: Not sure what I'm looking at in this article and how it's connected to the botched "DRM-free, but not really" release of HITMAN (2016) in September last year I was referring to?
tfishell: IO doesn't have any control over Kane & Lynch anymore, so afaik there's no reason to believe they played a role in getting the series here.
But maybe by "sign" you meant it abstractly like "sign in the stars".
Mea culpa, somehow it didn't register that the K&L intellectual property is still owned by Square Enix and not iOi themselves.
The HITMAN comeback in roughly 2 months time could still happen though, also for signs (of the speculative kind, yes) like the database entry for HITMAN 2 (2018) reported a while back.
With recent developments further corroborating that always-online dependency is the "game-killer" iOi may feel more encouraged to NOT be like Ubisoft, too. One would hope so at least.