[...] Don't remember. [...] Can't find the game I'm thinking of anywhere. Or perhaps you know of the game I'm trying to remember? [...]
Which game are you thinking of? Give me some info, like setup, what role you had, something memorable that happened.
[...] FINE! Mr. Grumpy Pants. I'm sacrificing my precious, precious sleep time for you.
That took me NINETEEN minutes. Anyways, you're going to need to explain a bit about what goes on around his play. I took a poke through the later part of the thread and saw dedo self hammer... because game was a forgone conclusion? Also, I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say here, as from what I see flub had a similar play last game where he was town first day, then converted, then lynched day 2. Am I missing something? [...]
You must be a slower reader than me then, and English isn't even my native tongue.
You appeared perplexed by the idea of flubbucket seriously suggesting to be lynched, and took his position to be a joke initially. I referred you to game #51, because flubbucket may be joking around a lot, but he's also an intelligent, experienced and tactical player.
This is the town-mindset side of things. He could well be scum counting on enough people connecting the dots in this specific way and not lynch him in the end, and I certainly don't put it past him, because he's an intelligent, experienced and tactical player.
(I see ZFR made a similar point in his post #431)
[...] Oh, and I think you asked about the part in the town PM where it includes "Dying for your team". I was kind of under the impression that was included in most town PMs? I seem to not be able to access my old chat messages so can't confirm. [...]
For someone that has gone over the thread, and has replied or commented on almost everything since they last were on, you're seriously "Oh, and I think" regarding my third and last question I asked you in the very same post you already responded to by quoting it twice?
I asked you about that bit in a very specific context in this particular game setup. I'll be waiting for your reply to it.
Well, I know my reasons for voting you, they're in my head. [...]
When you voted adaliabooks you attributed it to antsy-scum vibes (post #206). When I asked you about them, you said it was just a feeling (post #219). But here you say that you do have reasons. Care to share them with the rest of us?
[...] But ZFR, I dunno, I wasn't expecting him to vote you.
Why weren't you expecting ZFR to vote adaliabooks?
[...] Also, who are you thinking you'd vote for right now? [...]
I'm not quite there yet.
[...] Was that what you were trying to avoid saying? [...]
Yes and no.
[...] Well lets say five people post that they find Leonard very scummy and they happen to be right. Maybe the other scum team had found him to be quite townie but now that his possible scuminess is pointed out that team decide not to try convert him. [...]
If at least five people found a player very scummy and happen to be right, isn't it equally possible that at least two more look closer into him, which may well result in said player getting lynched, hence remove them from the picture before Night fall, and reduce the scum numbers by one?
[...] Do you think scum are going to just blindly post in their QT as to what they are wanting to do without talking about it among themselves? Do you think because someone is scum that they all of a sudden drop IQ points and can only use ideas posted in the game?
There's always a chance they have overlooked or missed something; it has happened.
And while they certainly think things over and exchange ideas, with two 2-man scum teams, the ideas floating among each team may well be more limited than say in a single 4-man team.
Being cautious can't harm us.